Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842020000200081 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of hallux valgus using radiography during weight bearing as the gold standard. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing MRI of the foot and radiography of the foot during weight bearing at our institution between January and June of 2015. The hallux valgus angle (HVA) was measured on MRI and radiography. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and simple linear regression were used in order to compare measurements. Patients were divided into two groups according to the HVA determined on radiography: > 15° (hallux valgus) and ≤ 15° (control). Qualitative and quantitative assessments of MRI scans were performed. For quantitative assessment, receiver operating characteristic curves were used in order to determine the HVA cutoff with the highest accuracy. Results: A total of 66 MRI scans were included, 22 in the hallux valgus group and 44 in the control group. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests indicated a significant difference between the radiography and MRI measurements. Simple linear regression showed a nonlinear relationship between the measurements and values did not present a strong correlation. In comparison with the radiography measurements, MRI with an HVA cutoff of 16.4° exhibited the highest accuracy (86%). The accuracy of the subjective (qualitative) assessment was inferior to the objective assessment (measurement of the HVA). Conclusion: Hallux valgus can be diagnosed by measuring the HVA on MRI, satisfactory accuracy being achieved with an HVA cutoff of 16.4°. |
id |
CBR-1_90cb371c4c572d11bd5e4250fa565bfa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842020000200081 |
network_acronym_str |
CBR-1 |
network_name_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgusMagnetic resonance imagingFootHallux valgusForefoot, human/diagnostic imagingMetatarsophalangeal joint/ diagnostic imagingAbstract Objective: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of hallux valgus using radiography during weight bearing as the gold standard. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing MRI of the foot and radiography of the foot during weight bearing at our institution between January and June of 2015. The hallux valgus angle (HVA) was measured on MRI and radiography. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and simple linear regression were used in order to compare measurements. Patients were divided into two groups according to the HVA determined on radiography: > 15° (hallux valgus) and ≤ 15° (control). Qualitative and quantitative assessments of MRI scans were performed. For quantitative assessment, receiver operating characteristic curves were used in order to determine the HVA cutoff with the highest accuracy. Results: A total of 66 MRI scans were included, 22 in the hallux valgus group and 44 in the control group. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests indicated a significant difference between the radiography and MRI measurements. Simple linear regression showed a nonlinear relationship between the measurements and values did not present a strong correlation. In comparison with the radiography measurements, MRI with an HVA cutoff of 16.4° exhibited the highest accuracy (86%). The accuracy of the subjective (qualitative) assessment was inferior to the objective assessment (measurement of the HVA). Conclusion: Hallux valgus can be diagnosed by measuring the HVA on MRI, satisfactory accuracy being achieved with an HVA cutoff of 16.4°.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842020000200081Radiologia Brasileira v.53 n.2 2020reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2019.0054info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHelito,Paulo Victor PartezaniRocha,Stephano Raydan RamalhoOrtiz,Rafael TrevisanCerri,Giovanni GuidoLeite,Claudia da CostaRodrigues,Marcelo Bordaloeng2020-04-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842020000200081Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2020-04-07T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgus |
title |
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgus |
spellingShingle |
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgus Helito,Paulo Victor Partezani Magnetic resonance imaging Foot Hallux valgus Forefoot, human/diagnostic imaging Metatarsophalangeal joint/ diagnostic imaging |
title_short |
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgus |
title_full |
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgus |
title_fullStr |
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgus |
title_sort |
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing hallux valgus |
author |
Helito,Paulo Victor Partezani |
author_facet |
Helito,Paulo Victor Partezani Rocha,Stephano Raydan Ramalho Ortiz,Rafael Trevisan Cerri,Giovanni Guido Leite,Claudia da Costa Rodrigues,Marcelo Bordalo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha,Stephano Raydan Ramalho Ortiz,Rafael Trevisan Cerri,Giovanni Guido Leite,Claudia da Costa Rodrigues,Marcelo Bordalo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Helito,Paulo Victor Partezani Rocha,Stephano Raydan Ramalho Ortiz,Rafael Trevisan Cerri,Giovanni Guido Leite,Claudia da Costa Rodrigues,Marcelo Bordalo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Magnetic resonance imaging Foot Hallux valgus Forefoot, human/diagnostic imaging Metatarsophalangeal joint/ diagnostic imaging |
topic |
Magnetic resonance imaging Foot Hallux valgus Forefoot, human/diagnostic imaging Metatarsophalangeal joint/ diagnostic imaging |
description |
Abstract Objective: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of hallux valgus using radiography during weight bearing as the gold standard. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing MRI of the foot and radiography of the foot during weight bearing at our institution between January and June of 2015. The hallux valgus angle (HVA) was measured on MRI and radiography. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and simple linear regression were used in order to compare measurements. Patients were divided into two groups according to the HVA determined on radiography: > 15° (hallux valgus) and ≤ 15° (control). Qualitative and quantitative assessments of MRI scans were performed. For quantitative assessment, receiver operating characteristic curves were used in order to determine the HVA cutoff with the highest accuracy. Results: A total of 66 MRI scans were included, 22 in the hallux valgus group and 44 in the control group. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests indicated a significant difference between the radiography and MRI measurements. Simple linear regression showed a nonlinear relationship between the measurements and values did not present a strong correlation. In comparison with the radiography measurements, MRI with an HVA cutoff of 16.4° exhibited the highest accuracy (86%). The accuracy of the subjective (qualitative) assessment was inferior to the objective assessment (measurement of the HVA). Conclusion: Hallux valgus can be diagnosed by measuring the HVA on MRI, satisfactory accuracy being achieved with an HVA cutoff of 16.4°. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842020000200081 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842020000200081 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-3984.2019.0054 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira v.53 n.2 2020 reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) instacron:CBR |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
instacron_str |
CBR |
institution |
CBR |
reponame_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208940560744448 |