Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000600005 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective: To assess the accuracy of ultrasound in the visualization of the brachial plexus and to determine the value of the method in comparison with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: This was an anatomical study of the brachial plexuses of 20 asymptomatic adults (40 plexuses), comparing ultrasound and MRI in terms of their accuracy. In the ultrasound study, a high-frequency linear transducer was used, and a neurovascular coil was used in the MRI study. To estimate the frequency of visualization, the brachial plexus was divided into segments. Results: The cervical nerve roots, the upper trunk, and the middle trunk were the segments that were best visualized on ultrasound. On MRI, the degree of visualization was excellent for most of the segments. In the comparison between ultrasound and MRI, the C6, C7, upper trunk, and middle trunk segments showed equivalent degrees of visualization, with a high level of agreement between the two methods. Conclusion: In the brachial plexus, ultrasound can be used in the assessment of the cervical nerve roots, as well as of the upper and middle trunks, although it provides limited visualization of the remaining segments. Ultrasound and MRI showed a high level of agreement for the visualization of the C6, C7, and middle trunk segments. |
id |
CBR-1_e006d543ff7ca3a89d999397b3d9dff4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842018000600005 |
network_acronym_str |
CBR-1 |
network_name_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imagingBrachial plexus/anatomy & histologyUltrasonographyMagnetic resonance imagingAbstract Objective: To assess the accuracy of ultrasound in the visualization of the brachial plexus and to determine the value of the method in comparison with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: This was an anatomical study of the brachial plexuses of 20 asymptomatic adults (40 plexuses), comparing ultrasound and MRI in terms of their accuracy. In the ultrasound study, a high-frequency linear transducer was used, and a neurovascular coil was used in the MRI study. To estimate the frequency of visualization, the brachial plexus was divided into segments. Results: The cervical nerve roots, the upper trunk, and the middle trunk were the segments that were best visualized on ultrasound. On MRI, the degree of visualization was excellent for most of the segments. In the comparison between ultrasound and MRI, the C6, C7, upper trunk, and middle trunk segments showed equivalent degrees of visualization, with a high level of agreement between the two methods. Conclusion: In the brachial plexus, ultrasound can be used in the assessment of the cervical nerve roots, as well as of the upper and middle trunks, although it provides limited visualization of the remaining segments. Ultrasound and MRI showed a high level of agreement for the visualization of the C6, C7, and middle trunk segments.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000600005Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.6 2018reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0083info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaldana,Wanda Chiyoko IwakamiKodaira,Sergio KeidiCavalcanti,Conrado Furtado de AlbuquerqueRodrigues,Marcelo BordaloSaito,Osmar de CassioBuchpiguel,Carlos Albertoeng2018-12-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842018000600005Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2018-12-07T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging |
title |
Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging |
spellingShingle |
Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging Caldana,Wanda Chiyoko Iwakami Brachial plexus/anatomy & histology Ultrasonography Magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short |
Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full |
Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr |
Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed |
Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort |
Value of ultrasound in the anatomical evaluation of the brachial plexus: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging |
author |
Caldana,Wanda Chiyoko Iwakami |
author_facet |
Caldana,Wanda Chiyoko Iwakami Kodaira,Sergio Keidi Cavalcanti,Conrado Furtado de Albuquerque Rodrigues,Marcelo Bordalo Saito,Osmar de Cassio Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kodaira,Sergio Keidi Cavalcanti,Conrado Furtado de Albuquerque Rodrigues,Marcelo Bordalo Saito,Osmar de Cassio Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caldana,Wanda Chiyoko Iwakami Kodaira,Sergio Keidi Cavalcanti,Conrado Furtado de Albuquerque Rodrigues,Marcelo Bordalo Saito,Osmar de Cassio Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brachial plexus/anatomy & histology Ultrasonography Magnetic resonance imaging |
topic |
Brachial plexus/anatomy & histology Ultrasonography Magnetic resonance imaging |
description |
Abstract Objective: To assess the accuracy of ultrasound in the visualization of the brachial plexus and to determine the value of the method in comparison with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: This was an anatomical study of the brachial plexuses of 20 asymptomatic adults (40 plexuses), comparing ultrasound and MRI in terms of their accuracy. In the ultrasound study, a high-frequency linear transducer was used, and a neurovascular coil was used in the MRI study. To estimate the frequency of visualization, the brachial plexus was divided into segments. Results: The cervical nerve roots, the upper trunk, and the middle trunk were the segments that were best visualized on ultrasound. On MRI, the degree of visualization was excellent for most of the segments. In the comparison between ultrasound and MRI, the C6, C7, upper trunk, and middle trunk segments showed equivalent degrees of visualization, with a high level of agreement between the two methods. Conclusion: In the brachial plexus, ultrasound can be used in the assessment of the cervical nerve roots, as well as of the upper and middle trunks, although it provides limited visualization of the remaining segments. Ultrasound and MRI showed a high level of agreement for the visualization of the C6, C7, and middle trunk segments. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000600005 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000600005 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0083 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.6 2018 reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) instacron:CBR |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
instacron_str |
CBR |
institution |
CBR |
reponame_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208939829886976 |