Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amaral,Ricardo Holderbaum do
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Deprez,Fabrice C., Dalla-Bona,João Pedro, Watte,Guilherme, Roxo,Rômulo Santos, Marchiori,Edson, Hochhegger,Bruno
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842021000300165
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To evaluate variables affecting the need for analgesia after ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy performed on an outpatient basis. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 1,042 liver biopsies performed between 2012 and 2018. The data collected included the age and sex of the patient, as well as self-reported pain in the recovery room, the pain treatment used, the indication for the biopsy, and the lobe punctured. As per the protocol of our institution, physicians would re-evaluate patients with mild pain (1-3 on a visual analog scale), prescribe analgesics for those with moderate pain (4-6 on the visual analog scale), and prescribe opioids for those with severe pain (7-10 on the visual analog scale). Results: The main indications for biopsy were related to diffuse disease (in 89.9%), including the follow-up of hepatitis C (in 47.0%) and suspicion of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (in 38.0%). Pain requiring analgesia occurred in 8.0% of procedures. Of the 485 female patients, 51 (10.5%) needed analgesia, compared with 33 (5.9%) of the 557 male patients (p < 0.05). The need for analgesia did not differ in relation to patient age, the lobe punctured, or the indication for biopsy (nodular or diffuse disease). The analgesic most commonly used was dipyrone (in 75.9%), followed by paracetamol alone (16.4%) and their combination with opioids (7.6%). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy is safe and well tolerated. Postprocedural pain does not correlate with the lobe punctured, patient age, or the indication for biopsy and appears to affect more women than men.
id CBR-1_e56d63a96253ddf4b919f52047e58382
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-39842021000300165
network_acronym_str CBR-1
network_name_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experienceLiver diseasesUltrasonographyRadiology, interventionalBiopsy, needleAnalgesiaPain managementAbstract Objective: To evaluate variables affecting the need for analgesia after ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy performed on an outpatient basis. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 1,042 liver biopsies performed between 2012 and 2018. The data collected included the age and sex of the patient, as well as self-reported pain in the recovery room, the pain treatment used, the indication for the biopsy, and the lobe punctured. As per the protocol of our institution, physicians would re-evaluate patients with mild pain (1-3 on a visual analog scale), prescribe analgesics for those with moderate pain (4-6 on the visual analog scale), and prescribe opioids for those with severe pain (7-10 on the visual analog scale). Results: The main indications for biopsy were related to diffuse disease (in 89.9%), including the follow-up of hepatitis C (in 47.0%) and suspicion of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (in 38.0%). Pain requiring analgesia occurred in 8.0% of procedures. Of the 485 female patients, 51 (10.5%) needed analgesia, compared with 33 (5.9%) of the 557 male patients (p < 0.05). The need for analgesia did not differ in relation to patient age, the lobe punctured, or the indication for biopsy (nodular or diffuse disease). The analgesic most commonly used was dipyrone (in 75.9%), followed by paracetamol alone (16.4%) and their combination with opioids (7.6%). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy is safe and well tolerated. Postprocedural pain does not correlate with the lobe punctured, patient age, or the indication for biopsy and appears to affect more women than men.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842021000300165Radiologia Brasileira v.54 n.3 2021reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0035info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAmaral,Ricardo Holderbaum doDeprez,Fabrice C.Dalla-Bona,João PedroWatte,GuilhermeRoxo,Rômulo SantosMarchiori,EdsonHochhegger,Brunoeng2021-05-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842021000300165Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2021-05-20T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experience
title Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experience
spellingShingle Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experience
Amaral,Ricardo Holderbaum do
Liver diseases
Ultrasonography
Radiology, interventional
Biopsy, needle
Analgesia
Pain management
title_short Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experience
title_full Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experience
title_fullStr Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experience
title_full_unstemmed Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experience
title_sort Need for analgesia after percutaneous liver biopsy: a real-life experience
author Amaral,Ricardo Holderbaum do
author_facet Amaral,Ricardo Holderbaum do
Deprez,Fabrice C.
Dalla-Bona,João Pedro
Watte,Guilherme
Roxo,Rômulo Santos
Marchiori,Edson
Hochhegger,Bruno
author_role author
author2 Deprez,Fabrice C.
Dalla-Bona,João Pedro
Watte,Guilherme
Roxo,Rômulo Santos
Marchiori,Edson
Hochhegger,Bruno
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amaral,Ricardo Holderbaum do
Deprez,Fabrice C.
Dalla-Bona,João Pedro
Watte,Guilherme
Roxo,Rômulo Santos
Marchiori,Edson
Hochhegger,Bruno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Liver diseases
Ultrasonography
Radiology, interventional
Biopsy, needle
Analgesia
Pain management
topic Liver diseases
Ultrasonography
Radiology, interventional
Biopsy, needle
Analgesia
Pain management
description Abstract Objective: To evaluate variables affecting the need for analgesia after ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy performed on an outpatient basis. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 1,042 liver biopsies performed between 2012 and 2018. The data collected included the age and sex of the patient, as well as self-reported pain in the recovery room, the pain treatment used, the indication for the biopsy, and the lobe punctured. As per the protocol of our institution, physicians would re-evaluate patients with mild pain (1-3 on a visual analog scale), prescribe analgesics for those with moderate pain (4-6 on the visual analog scale), and prescribe opioids for those with severe pain (7-10 on the visual analog scale). Results: The main indications for biopsy were related to diffuse disease (in 89.9%), including the follow-up of hepatitis C (in 47.0%) and suspicion of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (in 38.0%). Pain requiring analgesia occurred in 8.0% of procedures. Of the 485 female patients, 51 (10.5%) needed analgesia, compared with 33 (5.9%) of the 557 male patients (p < 0.05). The need for analgesia did not differ in relation to patient age, the lobe punctured, or the indication for biopsy (nodular or diffuse disease). The analgesic most commonly used was dipyrone (in 75.9%), followed by paracetamol alone (16.4%) and their combination with opioids (7.6%). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy is safe and well tolerated. Postprocedural pain does not correlate with the lobe punctured, patient age, or the indication for biopsy and appears to affect more women than men.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842021000300165
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842021000300165
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0035
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira v.54 n.3 2021
reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron:CBR
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron_str CBR
institution CBR
reponame_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
collection Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br
_version_ 1754208941033652224