THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIC
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002019000200459 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT This article aims at establishing a dialogue between the theory of hegemony of Ernesto Laclau and the categorial interpretation of Marx by Moishe Postone. First, I will show that the hegemonic logic of Laclau appears logically constituted by the dynamic of capital as Postone studies it. Second, I will defend the relevance of the hegemonic conception of politics, no longer as an originary social ontology, but as a limited (yet partially effective) social logic characteristic of capitalist society. |
id |
CEBRAP-1_427a860aa5e2a5ad2369abe3d9a42f84 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-33002019000200459 |
network_acronym_str |
CEBRAP-1 |
network_name_str |
Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIChegemonycapitalismpopulismLaclauPostoneABSTRACT This article aims at establishing a dialogue between the theory of hegemony of Ernesto Laclau and the categorial interpretation of Marx by Moishe Postone. First, I will show that the hegemonic logic of Laclau appears logically constituted by the dynamic of capital as Postone studies it. Second, I will defend the relevance of the hegemonic conception of politics, no longer as an originary social ontology, but as a limited (yet partially effective) social logic characteristic of capitalist society.Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002019000200459Novos estudos CEBRAP v.38 n.2 2019reponame:Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)instname:Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)instacron:CEBRAP10.25091/s01013300201900020010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMARTÍN,FACUNDO NAHUELeng2019-09-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-33002019000200459Revistahttp://novosestudos.uol.com.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||novosestudos@cebrap.org.br1980-54030101-3300opendoar:2019-09-02T00:00Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) - Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIC |
title |
THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIC |
spellingShingle |
THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIC MARTÍN,FACUNDO NAHUEL hegemony capitalism populism Laclau Postone |
title_short |
THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIC |
title_full |
THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIC |
title_fullStr |
THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIC |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIC |
title_sort |
THE LOGIC OF CAPITAL AND HEGEMONIC LOGIC |
author |
MARTÍN,FACUNDO NAHUEL |
author_facet |
MARTÍN,FACUNDO NAHUEL |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MARTÍN,FACUNDO NAHUEL |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
hegemony capitalism populism Laclau Postone |
topic |
hegemony capitalism populism Laclau Postone |
description |
ABSTRACT This article aims at establishing a dialogue between the theory of hegemony of Ernesto Laclau and the categorial interpretation of Marx by Moishe Postone. First, I will show that the hegemonic logic of Laclau appears logically constituted by the dynamic of capital as Postone studies it. Second, I will defend the relevance of the hegemonic conception of politics, no longer as an originary social ontology, but as a limited (yet partially effective) social logic characteristic of capitalist society. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002019000200459 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002019000200459 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.25091/s01013300201900020010 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Novos estudos CEBRAP v.38 n.2 2019 reponame:Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) instname:Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP) instacron:CEBRAP |
instname_str |
Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP) |
instacron_str |
CEBRAP |
institution |
CEBRAP |
reponame_str |
Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) |
collection |
Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) - Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||novosestudos@cebrap.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208898985754624 |