Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | EAD em Foco |
Texto Completo: | https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2105 |
Resumo: | The Sufficiency Exam aims to evaluate average knowledge on the part of those who intend to act as accounting professionals. The study aims to compare the performance of traditional education versus online education based on the approval rates of the Sufficiency Exam at the Federal Accounting Council. There is no longitudinal discussion of student performance in the Sufficiency Examination considering traditional education and online education modalities. The evidences of this study are reference material to identify trends and promote the improvement of the training process of Brazilian accounting professionals. The 40,013 observations were grouped by federation states and teaching modality distributed between the first edition of 2019 and the second edition of 2022, generating 432 observations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Student's t-test for two independent samples, and ANOVA with post hoc Games-Howell. It was identified that the traditional education modality had better performance rates than online education. In addition, differences were identified between the periods under analysis, and after the second edition of 2020, there was a drop in students’ performance. The research draws attention to the drop in students’ performance, especially in the traditional education, and indicates that for some states of the federation, online education students have achieved better performance. Keywords: Teaching modality. Traditional Education. Online education. Sufficiency exam. |
id |
CECIERJ_0a5ea03cd399e4c85188887263391388 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br:article/2105 |
network_acronym_str |
CECIERJ |
network_name_str |
EAD em Foco |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal? Ensino Presencial versus Ensino à Distância: O Que os Índices de Aprovação no Exame de Suficiência do Conselho Federal de Contabilidade Revelam?Modalidade de ensinoEnsino presencialEnsino à distânciaExame de suficiênciaTeaching modalitySufficiency examOnline education Traditional Education The Sufficiency Exam aims to evaluate average knowledge on the part of those who intend to act as accounting professionals. The study aims to compare the performance of traditional education versus online education based on the approval rates of the Sufficiency Exam at the Federal Accounting Council. There is no longitudinal discussion of student performance in the Sufficiency Examination considering traditional education and online education modalities. The evidences of this study are reference material to identify trends and promote the improvement of the training process of Brazilian accounting professionals. The 40,013 observations were grouped by federation states and teaching modality distributed between the first edition of 2019 and the second edition of 2022, generating 432 observations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Student's t-test for two independent samples, and ANOVA with post hoc Games-Howell. It was identified that the traditional education modality had better performance rates than online education. In addition, differences were identified between the periods under analysis, and after the second edition of 2020, there was a drop in students’ performance. The research draws attention to the drop in students’ performance, especially in the traditional education, and indicates that for some states of the federation, online education students have achieved better performance. Keywords: Teaching modality. Traditional Education. Online education. Sufficiency exam.O Exame de Suficiência visa a avaliação de conhecimentos médios por parte daqueles que pretendem atuar como profissionais da contabilidade. O estudo objetiva comparar o desempenho dos estudantes do ensino presencial versus ensino à distância a partir dos índices de aprovação no Exame de Suficiência do Conselho Federal de Contabilidade. Não se nota uma discussão longitudinal do desempenho dos estudantes no Exame de Suficiência considerando as modalidades de ensino presencial e à distância. As evidências expostas neste estudo apresentam-se como material de consulta a fim de identificar tendências e promover o aprimoramento do processo de formação dos profissionais contábeis brasileiros. As 40.013 observações foram agrupadas por unidades da federação e modalidade de ensino distribuídas entre a primeira edição de 2019 e a segunda edição de 2022 gerando 432 observações. Os dados foram analisados por meio de estatística descritiva, teste t de Student para duas amostras independentes e ANOVA com post hoc de Games-Howell. Identificou-se que a modalidade de ensino presencial apresentou melhores índices de aproveitamento que o ensino à distância. Além disso, foram identificadas diferenças entre os períodos em análise, sendo que após a segunda edição de 2020 houve uma queda no desempenho dos estudantes. A pesquisa chama a atenção para a queda do desempenho dos discentes, em especial, da modalidade presencial e indica que para algumas unidades da federação os estudantes do ensino à distância têm alcançado melhor desempenho.Fundação Cecierj2024-02-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2105EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024); e2105EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2024); e2105EaD em Foco; v. 14 n. 1 (2024); e21052177-8310reponame:EAD em Focoinstname:Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)instacron:CECIERJporhttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2105/892Copyright (c) 2024 EaD em Focohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBandeira, Leonardo dos Santos Meurer, Alison Martins Silva, Jeová Brito2024-04-12T00:17:31Zoai:ojs.eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br:article/2105Revistahttps://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/RevistaONGhttp://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/oai||eademfoco@cecierj.edu.br2177-83102177-8310opendoar:2024-04-12T00:17:31EAD em Foco - Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal? Ensino Presencial versus Ensino à Distância: O Que os Índices de Aprovação no Exame de Suficiência do Conselho Federal de Contabilidade Revelam? |
title |
Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal? |
spellingShingle |
Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal? Bandeira, Leonardo dos Santos Modalidade de ensino Ensino presencial Ensino à distância Exame de suficiência Teaching modality Sufficiency exam Online education Traditional Education |
title_short |
Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal? |
title_full |
Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal? |
title_fullStr |
Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal? |
title_sort |
Traditional Education versus Online Education: What Do the Approval Rates in the Federal Accounting Council's Sufficiency Examination Reveal? |
author |
Bandeira, Leonardo dos Santos |
author_facet |
Bandeira, Leonardo dos Santos Meurer, Alison Martins Silva, Jeová Brito |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Meurer, Alison Martins Silva, Jeová Brito |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bandeira, Leonardo dos Santos Meurer, Alison Martins Silva, Jeová Brito |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Modalidade de ensino Ensino presencial Ensino à distância Exame de suficiência Teaching modality Sufficiency exam Online education Traditional Education |
topic |
Modalidade de ensino Ensino presencial Ensino à distância Exame de suficiência Teaching modality Sufficiency exam Online education Traditional Education |
description |
The Sufficiency Exam aims to evaluate average knowledge on the part of those who intend to act as accounting professionals. The study aims to compare the performance of traditional education versus online education based on the approval rates of the Sufficiency Exam at the Federal Accounting Council. There is no longitudinal discussion of student performance in the Sufficiency Examination considering traditional education and online education modalities. The evidences of this study are reference material to identify trends and promote the improvement of the training process of Brazilian accounting professionals. The 40,013 observations were grouped by federation states and teaching modality distributed between the first edition of 2019 and the second edition of 2022, generating 432 observations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Student's t-test for two independent samples, and ANOVA with post hoc Games-Howell. It was identified that the traditional education modality had better performance rates than online education. In addition, differences were identified between the periods under analysis, and after the second edition of 2020, there was a drop in students’ performance. The research draws attention to the drop in students’ performance, especially in the traditional education, and indicates that for some states of the federation, online education students have achieved better performance. Keywords: Teaching modality. Traditional Education. Online education. Sufficiency exam. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2105 |
url |
https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2105 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/2105/892 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 EaD em Foco https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 EaD em Foco https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cecierj |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cecierj |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024); e2105 EaD em Foco; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2024); e2105 EaD em Foco; v. 14 n. 1 (2024); e2105 2177-8310 reponame:EAD em Foco instname:Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ) instacron:CECIERJ |
instname_str |
Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ) |
instacron_str |
CECIERJ |
institution |
CECIERJ |
reponame_str |
EAD em Foco |
collection |
EAD em Foco |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
EAD em Foco - Fundação Centro de Ciências e Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CECIERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||eademfoco@cecierj.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798316347091845120 |