Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adults
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista CEFAC (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000500503 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze speech perception in normally hearing adults when listening in silence and with different types of noise. Methods: 40 individuals of both sexes, aged 18 to 45 years, participated in the study. Speech perception was assessed with the Lists of Sentences in Portuguese test, without a competing noise and with speech-spectrum, babble, and cocktail party noise. A mixed-effects linear regression model and the 95% confidence interval were used. Results: the subjects’ performance was worse in the three types of noise than in silence. When comparing the types of noise, differences were found in all combinations (speech-spectrum X babble, speech-spectrum X cocktail party, and babble X cocktail party), with a worse performance in babble, noise, followed by cocktail party. Conclusion: all noises negatively influenced speech perception, with a worse performance in babble, followed by cocktail party and speech-spectrum. |
id |
CEFAC-1_097634a76835871c8c2f8ce86d0186bf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-18462021000500503 |
network_acronym_str |
CEFAC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adultsSpeech PerceptionSpeech IntelligibilityHearing TestsNoiseSignal-To-Noise RatioHearingAudiologyABSTRACT Objective: to analyze speech perception in normally hearing adults when listening in silence and with different types of noise. Methods: 40 individuals of both sexes, aged 18 to 45 years, participated in the study. Speech perception was assessed with the Lists of Sentences in Portuguese test, without a competing noise and with speech-spectrum, babble, and cocktail party noise. A mixed-effects linear regression model and the 95% confidence interval were used. Results: the subjects’ performance was worse in the three types of noise than in silence. When comparing the types of noise, differences were found in all combinations (speech-spectrum X babble, speech-spectrum X cocktail party, and babble X cocktail party), with a worse performance in babble, noise, followed by cocktail party. Conclusion: all noises negatively influenced speech perception, with a worse performance in babble, followed by cocktail party and speech-spectrum.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000500503Revista CEFAC v.23 n.5 2021reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/20212352121info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira,Matheus CarvalhoZamberlan-Amorim,Nelma EllenWolf,Aline EpiphanioReis,Ana Cláudia Mirândola Barbosaeng2021-12-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462021000500503Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2021-12-07T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adults |
title |
Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adults |
spellingShingle |
Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adults Ferreira,Matheus Carvalho Speech Perception Speech Intelligibility Hearing Tests Noise Signal-To-Noise Ratio Hearing Audiology |
title_short |
Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adults |
title_full |
Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adults |
title_fullStr |
Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adults |
title_sort |
Influence of different types of noise on sentence recognition in normally hearing adults |
author |
Ferreira,Matheus Carvalho |
author_facet |
Ferreira,Matheus Carvalho Zamberlan-Amorim,Nelma Ellen Wolf,Aline Epiphanio Reis,Ana Cláudia Mirândola Barbosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zamberlan-Amorim,Nelma Ellen Wolf,Aline Epiphanio Reis,Ana Cláudia Mirândola Barbosa |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira,Matheus Carvalho Zamberlan-Amorim,Nelma Ellen Wolf,Aline Epiphanio Reis,Ana Cláudia Mirândola Barbosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Speech Perception Speech Intelligibility Hearing Tests Noise Signal-To-Noise Ratio Hearing Audiology |
topic |
Speech Perception Speech Intelligibility Hearing Tests Noise Signal-To-Noise Ratio Hearing Audiology |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze speech perception in normally hearing adults when listening in silence and with different types of noise. Methods: 40 individuals of both sexes, aged 18 to 45 years, participated in the study. Speech perception was assessed with the Lists of Sentences in Portuguese test, without a competing noise and with speech-spectrum, babble, and cocktail party noise. A mixed-effects linear regression model and the 95% confidence interval were used. Results: the subjects’ performance was worse in the three types of noise than in silence. When comparing the types of noise, differences were found in all combinations (speech-spectrum X babble, speech-spectrum X cocktail party, and babble X cocktail party), with a worse performance in babble, noise, followed by cocktail party. Conclusion: all noises negatively influenced speech perception, with a worse performance in babble, followed by cocktail party and speech-spectrum. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000500503 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000500503 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-0216/20212352121 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC v.23 n.5 2021 reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online) instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) instacron:CEFAC |
instname_str |
Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
instacron_str |
CEFAC |
institution |
CEFAC |
reponame_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
collection |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacefac@cefac.br |
_version_ |
1754122582977675264 |