Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology Department

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Deus,Ester Fannya Lucas Melo de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Zaccaro,Mirian, Abrahão,Cesar Augusto França, Arantes,Brenda Ferreira, Reis Junior,Arlindo Gonçalves, Peres,Tacyana Silva, Castro,Gisélia Gonçalves de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462019000600507
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to characterize and associate variables of epidemiological and audiometric profile of a population of a city in the interior of the Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Methods: a descriptive analytical documentary study carried out by means of the analysis of medical records form the department of audiology in a clinic, from 2014 to 2017. Pearson’s chi-squared test and the test for equality of two proportions were used, adopting a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). Results: there was a predominance of female and elderly patients. Between 2015 and 2017, there was hegemony of normal hearing results, and in 2014 the mixed loss predominated. In these four years, there was an increase in the number of referrals from otorhinolaryngologist, occupational and Auditory Health Care Service doctors. From 2014 to 2017, there was a significantly greater proportion of normal results in relation to the various degrees of loss, except for a mild degree, in 2015. There was a significantly higher frequency of elderly people presented with various types of loss, especially sensorineural and mixed ones, and of adults with conductive loss and auditory thresholds within standards of normality, with a difference in relation to the those in other age groups. Conclusion: most of the patients investigated had hearing loss when all hearing losses were added together. When comparing the degree of hearing loss separately with that of normally hearing individuals, normality prevailed. When normal hearing was excluded, mild, mixed, and bilateral hearing losses were most common.
id CEFAC-1_27c4404eda49f51853b8464dbc50f2b6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462019000600507
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology DepartmentHearingEpidemiologyHearing LossABSTRACT Purpose: to characterize and associate variables of epidemiological and audiometric profile of a population of a city in the interior of the Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Methods: a descriptive analytical documentary study carried out by means of the analysis of medical records form the department of audiology in a clinic, from 2014 to 2017. Pearson’s chi-squared test and the test for equality of two proportions were used, adopting a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). Results: there was a predominance of female and elderly patients. Between 2015 and 2017, there was hegemony of normal hearing results, and in 2014 the mixed loss predominated. In these four years, there was an increase in the number of referrals from otorhinolaryngologist, occupational and Auditory Health Care Service doctors. From 2014 to 2017, there was a significantly greater proportion of normal results in relation to the various degrees of loss, except for a mild degree, in 2015. There was a significantly higher frequency of elderly people presented with various types of loss, especially sensorineural and mixed ones, and of adults with conductive loss and auditory thresholds within standards of normality, with a difference in relation to the those in other age groups. Conclusion: most of the patients investigated had hearing loss when all hearing losses were added together. When comparing the degree of hearing loss separately with that of normally hearing individuals, normality prevailed. When normal hearing was excluded, mild, mixed, and bilateral hearing losses were most common.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462019000600507Revista CEFAC v.21 n.6 2019reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/201921613019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDeus,Ester Fannya Lucas Melo deZaccaro,MirianAbrahão,Cesar Augusto FrançaArantes,Brenda FerreiraReis Junior,Arlindo GonçalvesPeres,Tacyana SilvaCastro,Gisélia Gonçalves deeng2020-01-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462019000600507Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2020-01-07T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology Department
title Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology Department
spellingShingle Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology Department
Deus,Ester Fannya Lucas Melo de
Hearing
Epidemiology
Hearing Loss
title_short Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology Department
title_full Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology Department
title_fullStr Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology Department
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology Department
title_sort Epidemiological and audiometric profile in a Clinical Audiology Department
author Deus,Ester Fannya Lucas Melo de
author_facet Deus,Ester Fannya Lucas Melo de
Zaccaro,Mirian
Abrahão,Cesar Augusto França
Arantes,Brenda Ferreira
Reis Junior,Arlindo Gonçalves
Peres,Tacyana Silva
Castro,Gisélia Gonçalves de
author_role author
author2 Zaccaro,Mirian
Abrahão,Cesar Augusto França
Arantes,Brenda Ferreira
Reis Junior,Arlindo Gonçalves
Peres,Tacyana Silva
Castro,Gisélia Gonçalves de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Deus,Ester Fannya Lucas Melo de
Zaccaro,Mirian
Abrahão,Cesar Augusto França
Arantes,Brenda Ferreira
Reis Junior,Arlindo Gonçalves
Peres,Tacyana Silva
Castro,Gisélia Gonçalves de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hearing
Epidemiology
Hearing Loss
topic Hearing
Epidemiology
Hearing Loss
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to characterize and associate variables of epidemiological and audiometric profile of a population of a city in the interior of the Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Methods: a descriptive analytical documentary study carried out by means of the analysis of medical records form the department of audiology in a clinic, from 2014 to 2017. Pearson’s chi-squared test and the test for equality of two proportions were used, adopting a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). Results: there was a predominance of female and elderly patients. Between 2015 and 2017, there was hegemony of normal hearing results, and in 2014 the mixed loss predominated. In these four years, there was an increase in the number of referrals from otorhinolaryngologist, occupational and Auditory Health Care Service doctors. From 2014 to 2017, there was a significantly greater proportion of normal results in relation to the various degrees of loss, except for a mild degree, in 2015. There was a significantly higher frequency of elderly people presented with various types of loss, especially sensorineural and mixed ones, and of adults with conductive loss and auditory thresholds within standards of normality, with a difference in relation to the those in other age groups. Conclusion: most of the patients investigated had hearing loss when all hearing losses were added together. When comparing the degree of hearing loss separately with that of normally hearing individuals, normality prevailed. When normal hearing was excluded, mild, mixed, and bilateral hearing losses were most common.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462019000600507
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462019000600507
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0216/201921613019
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.21 n.6 2019
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122582209069056