Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto,Júlia Dalcin
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Laís, Temp,Déborah Aurélio, Dias,Valdani, Rohers,Dara Eliza, Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462019000400502
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the evasion rate of the Newborn Hearing Screening program’s retest, to verify whether the presence of risk indicators for hearing loss influences it, and to describe which risk indicators for hearing loss occur more frequently in these cases. Methods: 1,287 newborns/infants participated, who were screened between June 2015 and June 2018. All of them obtained "fail" as the Newborn Hearing Screening result, were referred to the retest and did not attend it. Information related to the occurrence of risk indicators for hearing loss was observed. Results: the study found that the evasion rate was of 15.23%. The presence of risk indicators for hearing loss did not show an association with non-attendance at this stage of the program (p-value = 0.087). The most frequent indicators in the cases of non-attendance at the retest were: ototoxic medication use and intensive care unit stay for more than five days. Conclusion: high evasion rate of the retest has been observed. It has been found that the presence of risk indicators did not influence the retest evasion rate. Use of ototoxic medication and stay at the intensive care unit were the most frequent indicators among those who did not attend the retest.
id CEFAC-1_622c28f013c51fa21116901651bf3e31
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462019000400502
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairmentNewborn ScreeningNewbornHearingRisk IndicatorABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the evasion rate of the Newborn Hearing Screening program’s retest, to verify whether the presence of risk indicators for hearing loss influences it, and to describe which risk indicators for hearing loss occur more frequently in these cases. Methods: 1,287 newborns/infants participated, who were screened between June 2015 and June 2018. All of them obtained "fail" as the Newborn Hearing Screening result, were referred to the retest and did not attend it. Information related to the occurrence of risk indicators for hearing loss was observed. Results: the study found that the evasion rate was of 15.23%. The presence of risk indicators for hearing loss did not show an association with non-attendance at this stage of the program (p-value = 0.087). The most frequent indicators in the cases of non-attendance at the retest were: ototoxic medication use and intensive care unit stay for more than five days. Conclusion: high evasion rate of the retest has been observed. It has been found that the presence of risk indicators did not influence the retest evasion rate. Use of ototoxic medication and stay at the intensive care unit were the most frequent indicators among those who did not attend the retest.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462019000400502Revista CEFAC v.21 n.4 2019reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/20192142519info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto,Júlia DalcinFerreira,LaísTemp,Déborah AurélioDias,ValdaniRohers,Dara ElizaBiaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieiraeng2019-09-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462019000400502Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2019-09-19T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment
title Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment
spellingShingle Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment
Pinto,Júlia Dalcin
Newborn Screening
Newborn
Hearing
Risk Indicator
title_short Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment
title_full Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment
title_fullStr Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment
title_full_unstemmed Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment
title_sort Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment
author Pinto,Júlia Dalcin
author_facet Pinto,Júlia Dalcin
Ferreira,Laís
Temp,Déborah Aurélio
Dias,Valdani
Rohers,Dara Eliza
Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Laís
Temp,Déborah Aurélio
Dias,Valdani
Rohers,Dara Eliza
Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto,Júlia Dalcin
Ferreira,Laís
Temp,Déborah Aurélio
Dias,Valdani
Rohers,Dara Eliza
Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Newborn Screening
Newborn
Hearing
Risk Indicator
topic Newborn Screening
Newborn
Hearing
Risk Indicator
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the evasion rate of the Newborn Hearing Screening program’s retest, to verify whether the presence of risk indicators for hearing loss influences it, and to describe which risk indicators for hearing loss occur more frequently in these cases. Methods: 1,287 newborns/infants participated, who were screened between June 2015 and June 2018. All of them obtained "fail" as the Newborn Hearing Screening result, were referred to the retest and did not attend it. Information related to the occurrence of risk indicators for hearing loss was observed. Results: the study found that the evasion rate was of 15.23%. The presence of risk indicators for hearing loss did not show an association with non-attendance at this stage of the program (p-value = 0.087). The most frequent indicators in the cases of non-attendance at the retest were: ototoxic medication use and intensive care unit stay for more than five days. Conclusion: high evasion rate of the retest has been observed. It has been found that the presence of risk indicators did not influence the retest evasion rate. Use of ototoxic medication and stay at the intensive care unit were the most frequent indicators among those who did not attend the retest.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462019000400502
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462019000400502
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0216/20192142519
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.21 n.4 2019
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122582152445952