Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adults

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Malavolta,Vitor Cantele
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Sanfins,Milaine Dominici, Soares,Larine da Silva, Skarzynski,Piotr Henryk, Moreira,Hélinton Goulart, Nascimento,Vanessa de Oliveira Cristiano, Schumacher,Christine Grellmann, Moura,Arielly Freitas, Lima,Sandi Severo de, Mundt,Aline Andressa, Betti,Tainá, Garcia,Michele Vargas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000600504
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to compare the latency and amplitude of the Frequency-Following Response and the Auditory Middle Latency Response in typical individuals and those with altered auditory abilities, as well as to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of both assessments in relation to central auditory processing. Methods: 32 individuals of both sexes were distributed into Group 1 (without altered auditory abilities) and Group 2 (with altered auditory abilities). The groups were divided according to behavioral tests of central auditory processing. Individuals in both groups underwent auditory evoked potentials. Student’s t-test was used for analysis, considering a 5% significance. Results: in Group 2, V and A had higher latency and lower amplitude and slope. Group 2 also had lower Na and Pa amplitudes in waves A1C3 and A2C3. The Frequency-Following Response showed 93% sensitivity and specificity, while the Auditory Middle Latency Response showed 87% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Conclusion: the individuals presented with altered hearing abilities showed higher latency and lower response amplitude in the Frequency Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response compared to typical individuals. The Frequency- Following Response showed a better balance of sensitivity and specificity.
id CEFAC-1_8bbe9a899dd08c805d678ded41d759ae
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462022000600504
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adultsAuditory PerceptionAuditory Evoked PotentialsAdultHearingABSTRACT Purpose: to compare the latency and amplitude of the Frequency-Following Response and the Auditory Middle Latency Response in typical individuals and those with altered auditory abilities, as well as to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of both assessments in relation to central auditory processing. Methods: 32 individuals of both sexes were distributed into Group 1 (without altered auditory abilities) and Group 2 (with altered auditory abilities). The groups were divided according to behavioral tests of central auditory processing. Individuals in both groups underwent auditory evoked potentials. Student’s t-test was used for analysis, considering a 5% significance. Results: in Group 2, V and A had higher latency and lower amplitude and slope. Group 2 also had lower Na and Pa amplitudes in waves A1C3 and A2C3. The Frequency-Following Response showed 93% sensitivity and specificity, while the Auditory Middle Latency Response showed 87% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Conclusion: the individuals presented with altered hearing abilities showed higher latency and lower response amplitude in the Frequency Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response compared to typical individuals. The Frequency- Following Response showed a better balance of sensitivity and specificity.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000600504Revista CEFAC v.24 n.6 2022reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/20222465622info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMalavolta,Vitor CanteleSanfins,Milaine DominiciSoares,Larine da SilvaSkarzynski,Piotr HenrykMoreira,Hélinton GoulartNascimento,Vanessa de Oliveira CristianoSchumacher,Christine GrellmannMoura,Arielly FreitasLima,Sandi Severo deMundt,Aline AndressaBetti,TaináGarcia,Michele Vargaseng2022-12-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462022000600504Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2022-12-06T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adults
title Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adults
spellingShingle Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adults
Malavolta,Vitor Cantele
Auditory Perception
Auditory Evoked Potentials
Adult
Hearing
title_short Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adults
title_full Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adults
title_fullStr Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adults
title_full_unstemmed Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adults
title_sort Frequency-Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response: an analysis of central auditory processing in young adults
author Malavolta,Vitor Cantele
author_facet Malavolta,Vitor Cantele
Sanfins,Milaine Dominici
Soares,Larine da Silva
Skarzynski,Piotr Henryk
Moreira,Hélinton Goulart
Nascimento,Vanessa de Oliveira Cristiano
Schumacher,Christine Grellmann
Moura,Arielly Freitas
Lima,Sandi Severo de
Mundt,Aline Andressa
Betti,Tainá
Garcia,Michele Vargas
author_role author
author2 Sanfins,Milaine Dominici
Soares,Larine da Silva
Skarzynski,Piotr Henryk
Moreira,Hélinton Goulart
Nascimento,Vanessa de Oliveira Cristiano
Schumacher,Christine Grellmann
Moura,Arielly Freitas
Lima,Sandi Severo de
Mundt,Aline Andressa
Betti,Tainá
Garcia,Michele Vargas
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Malavolta,Vitor Cantele
Sanfins,Milaine Dominici
Soares,Larine da Silva
Skarzynski,Piotr Henryk
Moreira,Hélinton Goulart
Nascimento,Vanessa de Oliveira Cristiano
Schumacher,Christine Grellmann
Moura,Arielly Freitas
Lima,Sandi Severo de
Mundt,Aline Andressa
Betti,Tainá
Garcia,Michele Vargas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Auditory Perception
Auditory Evoked Potentials
Adult
Hearing
topic Auditory Perception
Auditory Evoked Potentials
Adult
Hearing
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to compare the latency and amplitude of the Frequency-Following Response and the Auditory Middle Latency Response in typical individuals and those with altered auditory abilities, as well as to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of both assessments in relation to central auditory processing. Methods: 32 individuals of both sexes were distributed into Group 1 (without altered auditory abilities) and Group 2 (with altered auditory abilities). The groups were divided according to behavioral tests of central auditory processing. Individuals in both groups underwent auditory evoked potentials. Student’s t-test was used for analysis, considering a 5% significance. Results: in Group 2, V and A had higher latency and lower amplitude and slope. Group 2 also had lower Na and Pa amplitudes in waves A1C3 and A2C3. The Frequency-Following Response showed 93% sensitivity and specificity, while the Auditory Middle Latency Response showed 87% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Conclusion: the individuals presented with altered hearing abilities showed higher latency and lower response amplitude in the Frequency Following Response and Auditory Middle Latency Response compared to typical individuals. The Frequency- Following Response showed a better balance of sensitivity and specificity.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000600504
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000600504
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0216/20222465622
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.24 n.6 2022
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122583140204544