Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Avila,Audrei Thayse Viegel de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Teixeira,Adriane Ribeiro, Vernier,Luíza Silva, Silveira,Adriana Laybauer
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000400512
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to assess the universal neonatal hearing screening program using quality indicators. Methods: the records of newborns who were submitted to the neonatal hearing screening in 2018 were analyzed, comparing the data with the first five quality indicators established by the national guideline for neonatal hearing screening attention: 1) rate of screening coverage (≥95%); 2) age at the screening in months (up to the first month of life); 3) rate of referrals for diagnosis (2% to 4%); 4) rate of attendance to diagnostic examination (≥90%); 5) age at confirmed diagnosis (up to the third month of life). The data were submitted to quantitative and descriptive statistical analysis. Results: the rate of coverage, age at screening, and the number of referrals for diagnosis met the indicators established by the national guideline. The rate of attendance to diagnostic examination fell short of the expected, and the age at confirmed diagnosis was verified in 70% of the cases. Conclusion: using the quality indicators furnished important data on the effectiveness of the neonatal hearing screening program and identified opportunities to improve the service, which can help identify hearing loss, early.
id CEFAC-1_8e997764ddada31ea661e99754e2e41e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462021000400512
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicatorsHearingNeonatal ScreeningNewbornQuality ControlABSTRACT Purpose: to assess the universal neonatal hearing screening program using quality indicators. Methods: the records of newborns who were submitted to the neonatal hearing screening in 2018 were analyzed, comparing the data with the first five quality indicators established by the national guideline for neonatal hearing screening attention: 1) rate of screening coverage (≥95%); 2) age at the screening in months (up to the first month of life); 3) rate of referrals for diagnosis (2% to 4%); 4) rate of attendance to diagnostic examination (≥90%); 5) age at confirmed diagnosis (up to the third month of life). The data were submitted to quantitative and descriptive statistical analysis. Results: the rate of coverage, age at screening, and the number of referrals for diagnosis met the indicators established by the national guideline. The rate of attendance to diagnostic examination fell short of the expected, and the age at confirmed diagnosis was verified in 70% of the cases. Conclusion: using the quality indicators furnished important data on the effectiveness of the neonatal hearing screening program and identified opportunities to improve the service, which can help identify hearing loss, early.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000400512Revista CEFAC v.23 n.4 2021reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/20212344421info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAvila,Audrei Thayse Viegel deTeixeira,Adriane RibeiroVernier,Luíza SilvaSilveira,Adriana Laybauereng2021-11-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462021000400512Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2021-11-16T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators
title Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators
spellingShingle Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators
Avila,Audrei Thayse Viegel de
Hearing
Neonatal Screening
Newborn
Quality Control
title_short Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators
title_full Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators
title_fullStr Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators
title_full_unstemmed Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators
title_sort Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators
author Avila,Audrei Thayse Viegel de
author_facet Avila,Audrei Thayse Viegel de
Teixeira,Adriane Ribeiro
Vernier,Luíza Silva
Silveira,Adriana Laybauer
author_role author
author2 Teixeira,Adriane Ribeiro
Vernier,Luíza Silva
Silveira,Adriana Laybauer
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Avila,Audrei Thayse Viegel de
Teixeira,Adriane Ribeiro
Vernier,Luíza Silva
Silveira,Adriana Laybauer
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hearing
Neonatal Screening
Newborn
Quality Control
topic Hearing
Neonatal Screening
Newborn
Quality Control
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to assess the universal neonatal hearing screening program using quality indicators. Methods: the records of newborns who were submitted to the neonatal hearing screening in 2018 were analyzed, comparing the data with the first five quality indicators established by the national guideline for neonatal hearing screening attention: 1) rate of screening coverage (≥95%); 2) age at the screening in months (up to the first month of life); 3) rate of referrals for diagnosis (2% to 4%); 4) rate of attendance to diagnostic examination (≥90%); 5) age at confirmed diagnosis (up to the third month of life). The data were submitted to quantitative and descriptive statistical analysis. Results: the rate of coverage, age at screening, and the number of referrals for diagnosis met the indicators established by the national guideline. The rate of attendance to diagnostic examination fell short of the expected, and the age at confirmed diagnosis was verified in 70% of the cases. Conclusion: using the quality indicators furnished important data on the effectiveness of the neonatal hearing screening program and identified opportunities to improve the service, which can help identify hearing loss, early.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000400512
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000400512
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0216/20212344421
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.23 n.4 2021
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122582967189504