Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista CEFAC (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000300291 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: to validate the neurofunctional evaluation for Alternative and Augmented Communication protocol. Methods: the study was carried out in four steps: instrument construction, literature review, clinical validation and evaluation of the protocol by field experts, through an interactive questionnaire which was repeatedly applied, until the last set of responses was regarded as satisfactory. In addition, clinical evaluations were performed by applying the protocol in children and adolescents with motor impairment in a clinical trial. Results: statistical analysis of the protocol application in the therapeutic setting showed the Kappa indices for each observer with an overall mean of 0.436 (moderate agreement), besides the agreement among experts in content evaluation. Conclusion: agreement between the evaluators, specialists and the protocol clinical application results allowed choosing and implementing an alternative communication resource appropriate to the neuromuscular characteristics of the patient, providing a low cost access, as well as the quick identification of the motor skills that enabled the speech-language therapy. |
id |
CEFAC-1_92c3c9ecf57c79182086c2300657b055 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-18462018000300291 |
network_acronym_str |
CEFAC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative CommunicationCommunicationDisabled PersonsValidation StudiesABSTRACT Objective: to validate the neurofunctional evaluation for Alternative and Augmented Communication protocol. Methods: the study was carried out in four steps: instrument construction, literature review, clinical validation and evaluation of the protocol by field experts, through an interactive questionnaire which was repeatedly applied, until the last set of responses was regarded as satisfactory. In addition, clinical evaluations were performed by applying the protocol in children and adolescents with motor impairment in a clinical trial. Results: statistical analysis of the protocol application in the therapeutic setting showed the Kappa indices for each observer with an overall mean of 0.436 (moderate agreement), besides the agreement among experts in content evaluation. Conclusion: agreement between the evaluators, specialists and the protocol clinical application results allowed choosing and implementing an alternative communication resource appropriate to the neuromuscular characteristics of the patient, providing a low cost access, as well as the quick identification of the motor skills that enabled the speech-language therapy.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2018-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000300291Revista CEFAC v.20 n.3 2018reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216201820318017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQueiroz,Ítala da PiedadeMenezes,Edênia da CunhaSantos,Ivana Maria Barboza dosGoes,Ueslane Melo deGivigi,Rosana Carla do Nascimentoeng2018-06-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462018000300291Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2018-06-26T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication |
title |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication |
spellingShingle |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication Queiroz,Ítala da Piedade Communication Disabled Persons Validation Studies |
title_short |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication |
title_full |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication |
title_fullStr |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication |
title_sort |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication |
author |
Queiroz,Ítala da Piedade |
author_facet |
Queiroz,Ítala da Piedade Menezes,Edênia da Cunha Santos,Ivana Maria Barboza dos Goes,Ueslane Melo de Givigi,Rosana Carla do Nascimento |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Menezes,Edênia da Cunha Santos,Ivana Maria Barboza dos Goes,Ueslane Melo de Givigi,Rosana Carla do Nascimento |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Queiroz,Ítala da Piedade Menezes,Edênia da Cunha Santos,Ivana Maria Barboza dos Goes,Ueslane Melo de Givigi,Rosana Carla do Nascimento |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Communication Disabled Persons Validation Studies |
topic |
Communication Disabled Persons Validation Studies |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: to validate the neurofunctional evaluation for Alternative and Augmented Communication protocol. Methods: the study was carried out in four steps: instrument construction, literature review, clinical validation and evaluation of the protocol by field experts, through an interactive questionnaire which was repeatedly applied, until the last set of responses was regarded as satisfactory. In addition, clinical evaluations were performed by applying the protocol in children and adolescents with motor impairment in a clinical trial. Results: statistical analysis of the protocol application in the therapeutic setting showed the Kappa indices for each observer with an overall mean of 0.436 (moderate agreement), besides the agreement among experts in content evaluation. Conclusion: agreement between the evaluators, specialists and the protocol clinical application results allowed choosing and implementing an alternative communication resource appropriate to the neuromuscular characteristics of the patient, providing a low cost access, as well as the quick identification of the motor skills that enabled the speech-language therapy. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000300291 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000300291 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-0216201820318017 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC v.20 n.3 2018 reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online) instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) instacron:CEFAC |
instname_str |
Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
instacron_str |
CEFAC |
institution |
CEFAC |
reponame_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
collection |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacefac@cefac.br |
_version_ |
1754122581742452736 |