Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mattos,Fabíola Maria Gonçalves Félix de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000400459
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to compare the variables of the Orofacial Evaluation with Scores Protocol between nasal, oral and oronasal breathers. Methods: a sample consisting of three distinct groups subdivided into nasal, oral and oronasal breathers, both genders, with ages ranging from 6 to 12 years. The characteristics of the orofacial musculature were measured using the protocol. Results: there was a significant difference between oral and oronasal breathers compared to nasal ones (p=0.0007) in specific variables such as palatal conformation (p=0.0073); mobility of tongue (p: 0.0111) and lip (p=0.0451), with a significant difference between the groups evaluated, also observed for the total protocol score (p=0.0007) and posture (p: 0.0073), where the nasal respirators differ from the oral and oronasal ones, the latter being similar. As for lip (p=0.0451) and tongue (p=0.0111) mobility, the groups studied presented different results among themselves. Conclusion: when comparing the groups of oral and oronasal breathers, in relation to the variables of the AMIOFE protocol, no statistically significant difference was seen between these two groups, which allows the conclusion that the orofacial myofunctional behavior between oral and oronasal breathers in this research, was similar.
id CEFAC-1_e71a377522a5f7452975561efee791c7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462018000400459
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathersSpeech, Language and Hearing SciencesBreathingStomatognathic SystemABSTRACT Purpose: to compare the variables of the Orofacial Evaluation with Scores Protocol between nasal, oral and oronasal breathers. Methods: a sample consisting of three distinct groups subdivided into nasal, oral and oronasal breathers, both genders, with ages ranging from 6 to 12 years. The characteristics of the orofacial musculature were measured using the protocol. Results: there was a significant difference between oral and oronasal breathers compared to nasal ones (p=0.0007) in specific variables such as palatal conformation (p=0.0073); mobility of tongue (p: 0.0111) and lip (p=0.0451), with a significant difference between the groups evaluated, also observed for the total protocol score (p=0.0007) and posture (p: 0.0073), where the nasal respirators differ from the oral and oronasal ones, the latter being similar. As for lip (p=0.0451) and tongue (p=0.0111) mobility, the groups studied presented different results among themselves. Conclusion: when comparing the groups of oral and oronasal breathers, in relation to the variables of the AMIOFE protocol, no statistically significant difference was seen between these two groups, which allows the conclusion that the orofacial myofunctional behavior between oral and oronasal breathers in this research, was similar.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000400459Revista CEFAC v.20 n.4 2018reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-021620182042818info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMattos,Fabíola Maria Gonçalves Félix deeng2019-03-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462018000400459Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2019-03-12T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers
title Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers
spellingShingle Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers
Mattos,Fabíola Maria Gonçalves Félix de
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
Breathing
Stomatognathic System
title_short Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers
title_full Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers
title_fullStr Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers
title_full_unstemmed Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers
title_sort Orofacial myofunctional characteristics of oral and oronasal breathers
author Mattos,Fabíola Maria Gonçalves Félix de
author_facet Mattos,Fabíola Maria Gonçalves Félix de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mattos,Fabíola Maria Gonçalves Félix de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
Breathing
Stomatognathic System
topic Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
Breathing
Stomatognathic System
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to compare the variables of the Orofacial Evaluation with Scores Protocol between nasal, oral and oronasal breathers. Methods: a sample consisting of three distinct groups subdivided into nasal, oral and oronasal breathers, both genders, with ages ranging from 6 to 12 years. The characteristics of the orofacial musculature were measured using the protocol. Results: there was a significant difference between oral and oronasal breathers compared to nasal ones (p=0.0007) in specific variables such as palatal conformation (p=0.0073); mobility of tongue (p: 0.0111) and lip (p=0.0451), with a significant difference between the groups evaluated, also observed for the total protocol score (p=0.0007) and posture (p: 0.0073), where the nasal respirators differ from the oral and oronasal ones, the latter being similar. As for lip (p=0.0451) and tongue (p=0.0111) mobility, the groups studied presented different results among themselves. Conclusion: when comparing the groups of oral and oronasal breathers, in relation to the variables of the AMIOFE protocol, no statistically significant difference was seen between these two groups, which allows the conclusion that the orofacial myofunctional behavior between oral and oronasal breathers in this research, was similar.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000400459
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000400459
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-021620182042818
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.20 n.4 2018
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122581770764288