Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista CEFAC (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000100506 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Purpose: to generate reference values for different behavioral central auditory processing (CAP) tests in normally hearing adults, with age stratification, as well as to compare the results, according to the presence or absence of CAP disorder (CAPD). Methods: the study sample consisted of 94 adults with normal auditory thresholds, with at least 11 years of schooling, who were divided into two groups, according to the performance in the Dichotic Sentences Identification Test (DSI), Masking Level Difference (MLD), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), Adapted Time-Compressed Speech (ATCS) and Duration and Frequency Pattern Tests (DPT/FPT).The 64 subjects who presented normality in all the tests formed the G1 group and the 30 subjects who presented alteration in at least one of them, originated the G2 group. To accomplish the analysis it was used the Mann-Whitney U Test. In all analyzes, the significance level was 5% (p≤0.05). Results: the sum of the two standard deviations for the mean performance of G1 yielded reference values for the different tests addressed. When G1 and G2 groups were compared, G1 presented better results, this being significant in the DSI (left ear), MLD, RGDT, DPT and FPT tests, for the group aged between 18 and 29 years and, DSI (right ear), RGDT and ATCS (right ear), for the group from 30 to 58 years. Conclusion: it was possible to generate reference values for different behavioral tests of CAP in normally hearing adults, as well as to verify a better performance for the group with no CAPD. |
id |
CEFAC-1_ec778fe183c146a938ebf45cdb4cb358 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-18462020000100506 |
network_acronym_str |
CEFAC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorderHearingHearing TestsAuditory PerceptionAuditory Perceptual DisordersABSTRACT Purpose: to generate reference values for different behavioral central auditory processing (CAP) tests in normally hearing adults, with age stratification, as well as to compare the results, according to the presence or absence of CAP disorder (CAPD). Methods: the study sample consisted of 94 adults with normal auditory thresholds, with at least 11 years of schooling, who were divided into two groups, according to the performance in the Dichotic Sentences Identification Test (DSI), Masking Level Difference (MLD), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), Adapted Time-Compressed Speech (ATCS) and Duration and Frequency Pattern Tests (DPT/FPT).The 64 subjects who presented normality in all the tests formed the G1 group and the 30 subjects who presented alteration in at least one of them, originated the G2 group. To accomplish the analysis it was used the Mann-Whitney U Test. In all analyzes, the significance level was 5% (p≤0.05). Results: the sum of the two standard deviations for the mean performance of G1 yielded reference values for the different tests addressed. When G1 and G2 groups were compared, G1 presented better results, this being significant in the DSI (left ear), MLD, RGDT, DPT and FPT tests, for the group aged between 18 and 29 years and, DSI (right ear), RGDT and ATCS (right ear), for the group from 30 to 58 years. Conclusion: it was possible to generate reference values for different behavioral tests of CAP in normally hearing adults, as well as to verify a better performance for the group with no CAPD.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000100506Revista CEFAC v.22 n.1 2020reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/202022113718info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSanguebuche,Taissane RodriguesPeixe,Bruna PiasGarcia,Michele Vargaseng2020-03-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462020000100506Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2020-03-12T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder |
title |
Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder |
spellingShingle |
Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder Sanguebuche,Taissane Rodrigues Hearing Hearing Tests Auditory Perception Auditory Perceptual Disorders |
title_short |
Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder |
title_full |
Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder |
title_fullStr |
Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder |
title_full_unstemmed |
Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder |
title_sort |
Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder |
author |
Sanguebuche,Taissane Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Sanguebuche,Taissane Rodrigues Peixe,Bruna Pias Garcia,Michele Vargas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Peixe,Bruna Pias Garcia,Michele Vargas |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sanguebuche,Taissane Rodrigues Peixe,Bruna Pias Garcia,Michele Vargas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hearing Hearing Tests Auditory Perception Auditory Perceptual Disorders |
topic |
Hearing Hearing Tests Auditory Perception Auditory Perceptual Disorders |
description |
ABSTRACT Purpose: to generate reference values for different behavioral central auditory processing (CAP) tests in normally hearing adults, with age stratification, as well as to compare the results, according to the presence or absence of CAP disorder (CAPD). Methods: the study sample consisted of 94 adults with normal auditory thresholds, with at least 11 years of schooling, who were divided into two groups, according to the performance in the Dichotic Sentences Identification Test (DSI), Masking Level Difference (MLD), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), Adapted Time-Compressed Speech (ATCS) and Duration and Frequency Pattern Tests (DPT/FPT).The 64 subjects who presented normality in all the tests formed the G1 group and the 30 subjects who presented alteration in at least one of them, originated the G2 group. To accomplish the analysis it was used the Mann-Whitney U Test. In all analyzes, the significance level was 5% (p≤0.05). Results: the sum of the two standard deviations for the mean performance of G1 yielded reference values for the different tests addressed. When G1 and G2 groups were compared, G1 presented better results, this being significant in the DSI (left ear), MLD, RGDT, DPT and FPT tests, for the group aged between 18 and 29 years and, DSI (right ear), RGDT and ATCS (right ear), for the group from 30 to 58 years. Conclusion: it was possible to generate reference values for different behavioral tests of CAP in normally hearing adults, as well as to verify a better performance for the group with no CAPD. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000100506 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000100506 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-0216/202022113718 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC v.22 n.1 2020 reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online) instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) instacron:CEFAC |
instname_str |
Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
instacron_str |
CEFAC |
institution |
CEFAC |
reponame_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
collection |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacefac@cefac.br |
_version_ |
1754122582231089152 |