Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033 |
Resumo: | The present research aims to understand which conceptions and beliefs Portuguese teachers have about assessment in compulsory school, and whether if their beliefs are in line with the guidelines on national education policy. Moreover, it aims to understand why Portuguese teachers use grade repetition as a common resource when it is not scientifically recommended. To do so, a focus group was conducted, and a survey carried out with a sample of Portuguese teachers’ population, with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 2.3%. Those procedures led to the conclusion that Portuguese teachers have personal beliefs towards assessment and grade repetition that have an impact on their practice and succeed in superimposing themselves on national educational policies and scientific recommendations. |
id |
CESGRAN-1_2ef12ebfb7f05882b0ba9f297109b960 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/3033 |
network_acronym_str |
CESGRAN-1 |
network_name_str |
Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in PortugalAssessment; Grade repetition; Teacher’s beliefs and practices; Teacher’s decision-makingThe present research aims to understand which conceptions and beliefs Portuguese teachers have about assessment in compulsory school, and whether if their beliefs are in line with the guidelines on national education policy. Moreover, it aims to understand why Portuguese teachers use grade repetition as a common resource when it is not scientifically recommended. To do so, a focus group was conducted, and a survey carried out with a sample of Portuguese teachers’ population, with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 2.3%. Those procedures led to the conclusion that Portuguese teachers have personal beliefs towards assessment and grade repetition that have an impact on their practice and succeed in superimposing themselves on national educational policies and scientific recommendations.Fundação CesgranrioCentro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia (CIES-IUL), Lisboa, PortugalCipriano, GabrielMartins, Susana da Cruz2021-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/303310.22347/2175-2753v13i39.3033Revista Meta: Avaliação; v. 13, n. 39 (2021): Revista Meta: Avaliação Abr./Jun.; 248 - 2732175-2753reponame:Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIOenghttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033/pdfPortugal; Europagrau de confiança de 95% e uma margem de erro de 2.3%Direitos autorais 2021 Fundacao Cesgranriohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-30T19:48:07Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/3033Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/indexPRIhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/oaimetaavaliacao@cesgranrio.org.br2175-27532175-2753opendoar:2021-06-30T19:48:07Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal |
title |
Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal |
spellingShingle |
Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal Cipriano, Gabriel Assessment; Grade repetition; Teacher’s beliefs and practices; Teacher’s decision-making |
title_short |
Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal |
title_full |
Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal |
title_fullStr |
Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal |
title_sort |
Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal |
author |
Cipriano, Gabriel |
author_facet |
Cipriano, Gabriel Martins, Susana da Cruz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, Susana da Cruz |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia (CIES-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cipriano, Gabriel Martins, Susana da Cruz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Assessment; Grade repetition; Teacher’s beliefs and practices; Teacher’s decision-making |
topic |
Assessment; Grade repetition; Teacher’s beliefs and practices; Teacher’s decision-making |
description |
The present research aims to understand which conceptions and beliefs Portuguese teachers have about assessment in compulsory school, and whether if their beliefs are in line with the guidelines on national education policy. Moreover, it aims to understand why Portuguese teachers use grade repetition as a common resource when it is not scientifically recommended. To do so, a focus group was conducted, and a survey carried out with a sample of Portuguese teachers’ population, with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 2.3%. Those procedures led to the conclusion that Portuguese teachers have personal beliefs towards assessment and grade repetition that have an impact on their practice and succeed in superimposing themselves on national educational policies and scientific recommendations. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-30 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033 10.22347/2175-2753v13i39.3033 |
url |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22347/2175-2753v13i39.3033 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Fundacao Cesgranrio http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Fundacao Cesgranrio http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Portugal; Europa grau de confiança de 95% e uma margem de erro de 2.3% |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Meta: Avaliação; v. 13, n. 39 (2021): Revista Meta: Avaliação Abr./Jun.; 248 - 273 2175-2753 reponame:Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) instname:Fundação Cesgranrio instacron:CESGRANRIO |
instname_str |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
instacron_str |
CESGRANRIO |
institution |
CESGRANRIO |
reponame_str |
Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) |
collection |
Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Cesgranrio |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
metaavaliacao@cesgranrio.org.br |
_version_ |
1754845672745467904 |