Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cipriano, Gabriel
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Martins, Susana da Cruz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033
Resumo: The present research aims to understand which conceptions and beliefs Portuguese teachers have about assessment in compulsory school, and whether if their beliefs are in line with the guidelines on national education policy. Moreover, it aims to understand why Portuguese teachers use grade repetition as a common resource when it is not scientifically recommended. To do so, a focus group was conducted, and a survey carried out with a sample of Portuguese teachers’ population, with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 2.3%. Those procedures led to the conclusion that Portuguese teachers have personal beliefs towards assessment and grade repetition that have an impact on their practice and succeed in superimposing themselves on national educational policies and scientific recommendations.
id CESGRAN-1_2ef12ebfb7f05882b0ba9f297109b960
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.localhost:article/3033
network_acronym_str CESGRAN-1
network_name_str Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro)
repository_id_str
spelling Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in PortugalAssessment; Grade repetition; Teacher’s beliefs and practices; Teacher’s decision-makingThe present research aims to understand which conceptions and beliefs Portuguese teachers have about assessment in compulsory school, and whether if their beliefs are in line with the guidelines on national education policy. Moreover, it aims to understand why Portuguese teachers use grade repetition as a common resource when it is not scientifically recommended. To do so, a focus group was conducted, and a survey carried out with a sample of Portuguese teachers’ population, with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 2.3%. Those procedures led to the conclusion that Portuguese teachers have personal beliefs towards assessment and grade repetition that have an impact on their practice and succeed in superimposing themselves on national educational policies and scientific recommendations.Fundação CesgranrioCentro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia (CIES-IUL), Lisboa, PortugalCipriano, GabrielMartins, Susana da Cruz2021-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/303310.22347/2175-2753v13i39.3033Revista Meta: Avaliação; v. 13, n. 39 (2021): Revista Meta: Avaliação Abr./Jun.; 248 - 2732175-2753reponame:Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIOenghttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033/pdfPortugal; Europagrau de confiança de 95% e uma margem de erro de 2.3%Direitos autorais 2021 Fundacao Cesgranriohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-30T19:48:07Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/3033Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/indexPRIhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/oaimetaavaliacao@cesgranrio.org.br2175-27532175-2753opendoar:2021-06-30T19:48:07Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal
title Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal
spellingShingle Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal
Cipriano, Gabriel
Assessment; Grade repetition; Teacher’s beliefs and practices; Teacher’s decision-making
title_short Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal
title_full Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal
title_fullStr Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal
title_sort Beliefs on assessment and grade repetition among teachers in Portugal
author Cipriano, Gabriel
author_facet Cipriano, Gabriel
Martins, Susana da Cruz
author_role author
author2 Martins, Susana da Cruz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia (CIES-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cipriano, Gabriel
Martins, Susana da Cruz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assessment; Grade repetition; Teacher’s beliefs and practices; Teacher’s decision-making
topic Assessment; Grade repetition; Teacher’s beliefs and practices; Teacher’s decision-making
description The present research aims to understand which conceptions and beliefs Portuguese teachers have about assessment in compulsory school, and whether if their beliefs are in line with the guidelines on national education policy. Moreover, it aims to understand why Portuguese teachers use grade repetition as a common resource when it is not scientifically recommended. To do so, a focus group was conducted, and a survey carried out with a sample of Portuguese teachers’ population, with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 2.3%. Those procedures led to the conclusion that Portuguese teachers have personal beliefs towards assessment and grade repetition that have an impact on their practice and succeed in superimposing themselves on national educational policies and scientific recommendations.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv


dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033
10.22347/2175-2753v13i39.3033
url https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033
identifier_str_mv 10.22347/2175-2753v13i39.3033
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/3033/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2021 Fundacao Cesgranrio
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2021 Fundacao Cesgranrio
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Portugal; Europa

grau de confiança de 95% e uma margem de erro de 2.3%
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Meta: Avaliação; v. 13, n. 39 (2021): Revista Meta: Avaliação Abr./Jun.; 248 - 273
2175-2753
reponame:Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro)
instname:Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron:CESGRANRIO
instname_str Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron_str CESGRANRIO
institution CESGRANRIO
reponame_str Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro)
collection Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Cesgranrio
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metaavaliacao@cesgranrio.org.br
_version_ 1754845672745467904