The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at Stake
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Psicologia (Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-98932019000700302 |
Resumo: | Abstract So-called “sexual reorientation therapies” represent a challenge to the scientific and professional development of Psychology, and to the exercise and free expression of sexual orientation as a human right. Since 1999 the Brazilian Federal Council of Psychology (CFP) has implemented a ban against the pathologization of homosexuality. The validity of that normative instrument, known as Resolution 01/99, has been contested by moral entrepreneurs within the profession, self-identified as Evangelical Christians, who pose a broader challenge to Psychology, standing as a secular, science-based profession. The controversy created by the challenge to CFP’s positions on homosexuality and on religion extrapolates the domain of Psychology and its regulation as a science and profession, and becomes one more dispute related to sexual politics in Brazil. In this paper we explore the process by which sexual diversity has become a contentious issue for Brazilian Psychology, affecting the politics and regulation of the profession. |
id |
CFP-1_7f67c1ef7959e752d514906a9baa6906 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1414-98932019000700302 |
network_acronym_str |
CFP-1 |
network_name_str |
Psicologia (Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at StakePsychologySexual DiversityHomosexualityReligionPentecostalismAbstract So-called “sexual reorientation therapies” represent a challenge to the scientific and professional development of Psychology, and to the exercise and free expression of sexual orientation as a human right. Since 1999 the Brazilian Federal Council of Psychology (CFP) has implemented a ban against the pathologization of homosexuality. The validity of that normative instrument, known as Resolution 01/99, has been contested by moral entrepreneurs within the profession, self-identified as Evangelical Christians, who pose a broader challenge to Psychology, standing as a secular, science-based profession. The controversy created by the challenge to CFP’s positions on homosexuality and on religion extrapolates the domain of Psychology and its regulation as a science and profession, and becomes one more dispute related to sexual politics in Brazil. In this paper we explore the process by which sexual diversity has become a contentious issue for Brazilian Psychology, affecting the politics and regulation of the profession.Conselho Federal de Psicologia2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-98932019000700302Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão v.39 n.spe3 2019reponame:Psicologia (Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Online)instname:Conselho Federal de Psicologia (CFP)instacron:CFP10.1590/1982-3703003228496info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMacedo,Cleber Michel Ribeiro deSívori,Horacio Federicoeng2020-04-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1414-98932019000700302Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/pcp/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@cfp.org.br1982-37031414-9893opendoar:2020-04-29T00:00Psicologia (Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Online) - Conselho Federal de Psicologia (CFP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at Stake |
title |
The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at Stake |
spellingShingle |
The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at Stake Macedo,Cleber Michel Ribeiro de Psychology Sexual Diversity Homosexuality Religion Pentecostalism |
title_short |
The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at Stake |
title_full |
The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at Stake |
title_fullStr |
The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at Stake |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at Stake |
title_sort |
The Sexual Diversity Debate in Brazilian Psychology: Professional Regulation at Stake |
author |
Macedo,Cleber Michel Ribeiro de |
author_facet |
Macedo,Cleber Michel Ribeiro de Sívori,Horacio Federico |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sívori,Horacio Federico |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Macedo,Cleber Michel Ribeiro de Sívori,Horacio Federico |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Psychology Sexual Diversity Homosexuality Religion Pentecostalism |
topic |
Psychology Sexual Diversity Homosexuality Religion Pentecostalism |
description |
Abstract So-called “sexual reorientation therapies” represent a challenge to the scientific and professional development of Psychology, and to the exercise and free expression of sexual orientation as a human right. Since 1999 the Brazilian Federal Council of Psychology (CFP) has implemented a ban against the pathologization of homosexuality. The validity of that normative instrument, known as Resolution 01/99, has been contested by moral entrepreneurs within the profession, self-identified as Evangelical Christians, who pose a broader challenge to Psychology, standing as a secular, science-based profession. The controversy created by the challenge to CFP’s positions on homosexuality and on religion extrapolates the domain of Psychology and its regulation as a science and profession, and becomes one more dispute related to sexual politics in Brazil. In this paper we explore the process by which sexual diversity has become a contentious issue for Brazilian Psychology, affecting the politics and regulation of the profession. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-98932019000700302 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-98932019000700302 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-3703003228496 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Federal de Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Federal de Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão v.39 n.spe3 2019 reponame:Psicologia (Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Online) instname:Conselho Federal de Psicologia (CFP) instacron:CFP |
instname_str |
Conselho Federal de Psicologia (CFP) |
instacron_str |
CFP |
institution |
CFP |
reponame_str |
Psicologia (Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Online) |
collection |
Psicologia (Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia (Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Online) - Conselho Federal de Psicologia (CFP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@cfp.org.br |
_version_ |
1754122431818104832 |