INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3876 |
Resumo: | Objective: The objective of this article is to analyze the manner and form in which the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court and the Colombian Constitutional Court define, characterize or support judicial independence.Methodology: A deductive, descriptive and comparative methodology is used, combined with an empirical jurisprudential research technique and indirect doctrinal and normative documentation. Results: This paper concluded that: (1) Although there are common elements, there persists a concern about the competence attributed by the constitutional courts in the definition and understanding of judicial independence, being healthy to submit their understanding to the Constitution and the law, since the judge in his human condition is fallible; (2) Beyond understanding impartiality, objectivity and considering deliberation, direct participation of citizens in the decision-making process, as well as other instruments, may be a healthy and rational idea to mitigate the excessive judicial power; (3) The addressee of the guarantee of independence is society, but not only the one who has access and knowledge to justice, but everyone on equal terms; (4) Overcoming the position of the supremacy of the judiciary, Sieyès' theory of the negative principle of le pouvoir constituant, provides an analysis to the promotion of a constitutionalism that allows the other elected branches of government to make and execute their own decisions. Contributions: The article elaborates on the morphology of judicial independence. Although it is usually identified as a generic principle, not for that reason less fundamental of the Social State of Law, the research contributes by diving into the depth of its implication as a principle, the meaning and sources of its generic invocation, its theoretical assumptions, its perspectives, the legitimacy of its addressees and holders. In general, on the limits, forms and structures, even more so when it is the constitutional courts themselves who invoke it, particularly the Colombian Constitutional Court and Brazilian Federal Supreme Court. |
id |
CHRISTUS-2_cdc252a75e3f83e6a4ae5da807231b1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/3876 |
network_acronym_str |
CHRISTUS-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT¿INDEPENDENCIA JUDICIAL SEGÚN LOS JUECES CONSTITUCIONALES? UN ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL A PARTIR DE LAS DECISIONES DEL SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL DE BRASIL Y DE LA CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL DE COLOMBIAIndependence of the judiciary; Judicial autonomy; Constitutional Courts; Social rights; Judicial PowerDerecho constitucional comparadoIndependencia judicial; Autonomía de los jueces; Tibunales constitucionales; Derechos sociales; Poder judicialObjective: The objective of this article is to analyze the manner and form in which the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court and the Colombian Constitutional Court define, characterize or support judicial independence.Methodology: A deductive, descriptive and comparative methodology is used, combined with an empirical jurisprudential research technique and indirect doctrinal and normative documentation. Results: This paper concluded that: (1) Although there are common elements, there persists a concern about the competence attributed by the constitutional courts in the definition and understanding of judicial independence, being healthy to submit their understanding to the Constitution and the law, since the judge in his human condition is fallible; (2) Beyond understanding impartiality, objectivity and considering deliberation, direct participation of citizens in the decision-making process, as well as other instruments, may be a healthy and rational idea to mitigate the excessive judicial power; (3) The addressee of the guarantee of independence is society, but not only the one who has access and knowledge to justice, but everyone on equal terms; (4) Overcoming the position of the supremacy of the judiciary, Sieyès' theory of the negative principle of le pouvoir constituant, provides an analysis to the promotion of a constitutionalism that allows the other elected branches of government to make and execute their own decisions. Contributions: The article elaborates on the morphology of judicial independence. Although it is usually identified as a generic principle, not for that reason less fundamental of the Social State of Law, the research contributes by diving into the depth of its implication as a principle, the meaning and sources of its generic invocation, its theoretical assumptions, its perspectives, the legitimacy of its addressees and holders. In general, on the limits, forms and structures, even more so when it is the constitutional courts themselves who invoke it, particularly the Colombian Constitutional Court and Brazilian Federal Supreme Court.Objetivo: El presente artículo tiene por objetivo analizar la manera y la forma como el Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil y la Corte Constitucional de Colombia definen, caracterizan o fundamentan la independencia judicial.Metodología: Se utiliza una metodología deductiva, descriptiva y comparada, conjugada con una técnica de investigación empírica jurisprudencial y de documentación indirecta doctrinaria y normativa. Resultados: Se concluye que: (1) Aunque existen elementos comunes, persiste una preocupación sobre la competencia atribuida por parte de los tribunales constitucionales en la definición y el entendimiento de la independencia judicial, siendo saludable que se someta su entendimiento a la Constitución y la ley, pues el juez en su condición humana es falible; (2) Más allá de entender la imparcialidad, la objetividad y de considerar la deliberación, la participación directa de los ciudadanos en el proceso de decisión, así como otros instrumentos, puede ser una idea sana y racional para mitigar el excesivo poder judicial; (3) El destinatario de la garantía de la independencia es la sociedad, pero no solo el que tiene acceso y conocimiento a la justicia, sino todos en condiciones de igualdad; (4) Superándose la posición de la supremacía del poder judicial, la teoría del principio negativo de Sieyès sobre le pouvoir constituant, brinda un análisis al fomento de un constitucionalismo que permite a las otras ramas electas del gobierno tomar y ejecutar sus propias decisiones.Contribuciones: El artículo profundiza sobre la morfología de la independencia judicial. Si bien usualmente se identifica como un principio genérico, no por eso menos fundamental del Estado Social de Derecho, la investigación contribuye al sumergirse en la profundidad de su implicancia como principio, el sentido y las fuentes de su invocación genérica, sus presupuestos teóricos, sus perspectivas, la legitimidad de sus destinatarios y titulares. En general, sobre los límites, las formas y las estructuras, más aún cuando son los propios tribunales constitucionales quienes lo invocan, particularmente la Corte Constitucional de Colombia y el Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil.Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)Gallo Aponte, William IvanLima Lopez Valle, Vivian CristinaCastanha de Freitas, Daniel2021-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/387610.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i32.p228-266.2021Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 32 (2021); 228-266Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 32 (2021); 228-266Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 32 (2021); 228-266Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 32 (2021); 228-2662447-66411806-042010.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i32.2021reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:UNICHRISTUSspahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3876/1404https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3876/1470Colombia- BrasilDireitos autorais 2021 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-07T11:41:02Zoai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/3876Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridicaPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/oaiopiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br2447-66411806-0420opendoar:2021-10-07T11:41:02Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ¿INDEPENDENCIA JUDICIAL SEGÚN LOS JUECES CONSTITUCIONALES? UN ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL A PARTIR DE LAS DECISIONES DEL SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL DE BRASIL Y DE LA CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL DE COLOMBIA |
title |
INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT |
spellingShingle |
INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Gallo Aponte, William Ivan Independence of the judiciary; Judicial autonomy; Constitutional Courts; Social rights; Judicial Power Derecho constitucional comparado Independencia judicial; Autonomía de los jueces; Tibunales constitucionales; Derechos sociales; Poder judicial |
title_short |
INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT |
title_full |
INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT |
title_fullStr |
INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT |
title_full_unstemmed |
INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT |
title_sort |
INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES? A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON BRAZILIAN SUPREME FEDERAL COURT AND COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT |
author |
Gallo Aponte, William Ivan |
author_facet |
Gallo Aponte, William Ivan Lima Lopez Valle, Vivian Cristina Castanha de Freitas, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima Lopez Valle, Vivian Cristina Castanha de Freitas, Daniel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gallo Aponte, William Ivan Lima Lopez Valle, Vivian Cristina Castanha de Freitas, Daniel |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Independence of the judiciary; Judicial autonomy; Constitutional Courts; Social rights; Judicial Power Derecho constitucional comparado Independencia judicial; Autonomía de los jueces; Tibunales constitucionales; Derechos sociales; Poder judicial |
topic |
Independence of the judiciary; Judicial autonomy; Constitutional Courts; Social rights; Judicial Power Derecho constitucional comparado Independencia judicial; Autonomía de los jueces; Tibunales constitucionales; Derechos sociales; Poder judicial |
description |
Objective: The objective of this article is to analyze the manner and form in which the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court and the Colombian Constitutional Court define, characterize or support judicial independence.Methodology: A deductive, descriptive and comparative methodology is used, combined with an empirical jurisprudential research technique and indirect doctrinal and normative documentation. Results: This paper concluded that: (1) Although there are common elements, there persists a concern about the competence attributed by the constitutional courts in the definition and understanding of judicial independence, being healthy to submit their understanding to the Constitution and the law, since the judge in his human condition is fallible; (2) Beyond understanding impartiality, objectivity and considering deliberation, direct participation of citizens in the decision-making process, as well as other instruments, may be a healthy and rational idea to mitigate the excessive judicial power; (3) The addressee of the guarantee of independence is society, but not only the one who has access and knowledge to justice, but everyone on equal terms; (4) Overcoming the position of the supremacy of the judiciary, Sieyès' theory of the negative principle of le pouvoir constituant, provides an analysis to the promotion of a constitutionalism that allows the other elected branches of government to make and execute their own decisions. Contributions: The article elaborates on the morphology of judicial independence. Although it is usually identified as a generic principle, not for that reason less fundamental of the Social State of Law, the research contributes by diving into the depth of its implication as a principle, the meaning and sources of its generic invocation, its theoretical assumptions, its perspectives, the legitimacy of its addressees and holders. In general, on the limits, forms and structures, even more so when it is the constitutional courts themselves who invoke it, particularly the Colombian Constitutional Court and Brazilian Federal Supreme Court. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3876 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i32.p228-266.2021 |
url |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3876 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i32.p228-266.2021 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3876/1404 https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3876/1470 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Colombia- Brasil |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 32 (2021); 228-266 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 32 (2021); 228-266 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 32 (2021); 228-266 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 32 (2021); 228-266 2447-6641 1806-0420 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i32.2021 reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) instacron:UNICHRISTUS |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
instacron_str |
UNICHRISTUS |
institution |
UNICHRISTUS |
reponame_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
collection |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
opiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797052897127563264 |