THE JUDICIALIZATION OF STRUCTURAL INJUNCTIONS AS A STRATEGY FOR POLITICAL MOBILIZATION: SOCIAL CHANGES FROM“BOTTOM-TOP” OR “TOP-BOTTOM”?

• Autor(a) principal: França, Eduarda Peixoto da Cunha
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Nóbrega, Flavianne Fernanda Bitencourt
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
• Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4087
• topic: socioeconomic and cultural rights; structural injunctions; public policies; global south; derechos socioeconómicos y culturales; litigio estructural; políticas públicas; sur global; Direito Constitucional; direitos socioeconômicos e culturais; litígios estruturais; políticas públicas; sul global

Objective: This article studies how the protection of socioeconomic and cultural rights (ESC rights) by national courts, in the Global South, can work from a counter-intuitive logic and foster social inequalities. In Brazil, it was observed the problem of individuals with more privileged economic and financial situation and aware of their citizenship are more benefited by the justiciability of ESC rights, to the detriment of socially vulnerable groups.Methodology: The research analyzes the problem of the ineffectiveness of these rights using the deductive method and bibliographic and documental research, investigating how the structural injunctions can be a strategy of political mobilization to trigger social transformations. Thus, the objective is to advance the debate on the roles that organized civil society, as well as the Constituted Powers, can play in an attempt to overcome systemic failures that involve massive and repeated violations of fundamental rights. In this context, it is discussed how social changes can occur, “from the bottom up” or “from the top down”. For this purpose, David Landau's ESC rights protection models were evaluated, as well as the effects of structural sentences and the impacts of affirmative and transformative measures.Results: In the end, it was concluded that the judicialization of structural demands involving the need for adjustment, design or implementation of a public policy, can work as an alternative means to the protection that has been offered to ESC rights by the courts, provided that judges use dialogical procedural tools , rather than prolate self-referenced atomized decisions. Thus, the struggle for social changes must occur, necessarily, through the coordination of efforts between judges, majority bodies and organized civil society.Contribuitions: It introduces structural processes as an alternative form to the atomized protection of social, economic and cultural rights, as well as pointing out the importance of dialogue and cooperation so that effective social changes can take place.