Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/242 |
Resumo: | The current global environmental law and governance regime has been designed primarily to attend to the worsening ecological crisis. Evidence, however, suggests that the regime is far from achieving its goal and it is failing in its efforts to solve what people perceive to be pervasive global environmental problems. There is little doubt that this regime is in need of urgent reforms and/or re-situation in a decidedly different paradigm. This article proposes that global constitutionalism, while no panacea, could contribute to these paradigm-shifting reforms by providing a new perspective through which to view the current deficient global environmental law and governance regime and, in real terms, ameliorating some of the deficiencies of the regime through a normative process of constitutionalization. |
id |
CHRISTUS-2_efffef72f4afe3490530e2ee10e5ea26 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/242 |
network_acronym_str |
CHRISTUS-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Arguing Global Environmental ConstitutionalismGlobal Environmental Law and Governance; Sustainability; Globalization; Global Environmental ConstitutionalismThe current global environmental law and governance regime has been designed primarily to attend to the worsening ecological crisis. Evidence, however, suggests that the regime is far from achieving its goal and it is failing in its efforts to solve what people perceive to be pervasive global environmental problems. There is little doubt that this regime is in need of urgent reforms and/or re-situation in a decidedly different paradigm. This article proposes that global constitutionalism, while no panacea, could contribute to these paradigm-shifting reforms by providing a new perspective through which to view the current deficient global environmental law and governance regime and, in real terms, ameliorating some of the deficiencies of the regime through a normative process of constitutionalization.Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)Kotzé, Louis J.2015-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/24210.12662/2447-6641oj.v13i17.p398-439.2015Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 13, n. 17 (2015); 398-439Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 13, n. 17 (2015); 398-439Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 13, n. 17 (2015); 398-439Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 13, n. 17 (2015); 398-4392447-66411806-042010.12662/2447-6641oj.v13i17.2015reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:UNICHRISTUSporhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/242/177Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-07T16:31:53Zoai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/242Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridicaPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/oaiopiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br2447-66411806-0420opendoar:2018-06-07T16:31:53Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
title |
Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
spellingShingle |
Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism Kotzé, Louis J. Global Environmental Law and Governance; Sustainability; Globalization; Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
title_short |
Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
title_full |
Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
title_fullStr |
Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
title_sort |
Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
author |
Kotzé, Louis J. |
author_facet |
Kotzé, Louis J. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kotzé, Louis J. |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Global Environmental Law and Governance; Sustainability; Globalization; Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
topic |
Global Environmental Law and Governance; Sustainability; Globalization; Global Environmental Constitutionalism |
description |
The current global environmental law and governance regime has been designed primarily to attend to the worsening ecological crisis. Evidence, however, suggests that the regime is far from achieving its goal and it is failing in its efforts to solve what people perceive to be pervasive global environmental problems. There is little doubt that this regime is in need of urgent reforms and/or re-situation in a decidedly different paradigm. This article proposes that global constitutionalism, while no panacea, could contribute to these paradigm-shifting reforms by providing a new perspective through which to view the current deficient global environmental law and governance regime and, in real terms, ameliorating some of the deficiencies of the regime through a normative process of constitutionalization. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-31 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/242 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v13i17.p398-439.2015 |
url |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/242 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v13i17.p398-439.2015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/242/177 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 13, n. 17 (2015); 398-439 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 13, n. 17 (2015); 398-439 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 13, n. 17 (2015); 398-439 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 13, n. 17 (2015); 398-439 2447-6641 1806-0420 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v13i17.2015 reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) instacron:UNICHRISTUS |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
instacron_str |
UNICHRISTUS |
institution |
UNICHRISTUS |
reponame_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
collection |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
opiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797052897720008704 |