The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estado |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasfilosofias/article/view/1145 |
Resumo: | The essay faces the traditional question about the type of relationship that should exist between civil society and state. Initially, unpacks the characteristics that mark the Anglo- American tradition. Following analyzes the thought of two fundamental political philosophers who have received little attention in the academic community: Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott. Separated by more than two centuries, the authors advocate a specific type of relationship between civil society and state from similar assumptions, advocating for the existence of a society unmediated by state structures. Concludes with the attempted refutation of the "fallacy of planning." |
id |
CONPEDI-15_c082d1f3290d0a65778d82ed9174c7e6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1145 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-15 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estado |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael OakeshottA Relação Estado-Sociedade a Partir aa Filosofia Política: Um Diálogo com Edmund Burke e Michael OakeshottEdmund burke;Michael oakeshott;Small platoons;Civil association;Enterprise associationEdmund burke;Michael oakeshott;Pequenos pelotões;Associação civil;Associação empresarialThe essay faces the traditional question about the type of relationship that should exist between civil society and state. Initially, unpacks the characteristics that mark the Anglo- American tradition. Following analyzes the thought of two fundamental political philosophers who have received little attention in the academic community: Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott. Separated by more than two centuries, the authors advocate a specific type of relationship between civil society and state from similar assumptions, advocating for the existence of a society unmediated by state structures. Concludes with the attempted refutation of the "fallacy of planning."O estudo enfrenta a tradicional questão sobre o tipo de relação que deve existir entre sociedade civil e Estado. Inicialmente, destrincha as características que marcam a tradição anglo-americana. Na sequência, analisa o pensamento de dois filósofos políticos fundamentais que vêm recebendo pouca atenção da comunidade acadêmica: Edmund Burke e Michael Oakeshott. Separados por mais de dois séculos, os autores defendem um tipo específico de relação entre sociedade civil e Estado a partir de pressupostos similares, advogando a favor da existência de uma sociedade não intermediada por estruturas estatais. Conclui pela tentativa de refutação da “falácia do planejamento”.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIPereira, Vitor Moreno Soliano2016-11-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasfilosofias/article/view/114510.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9652/2016.v2i1.1145Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estado; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 92 - 1112525-96522525-9652reponame:Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estadoinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasfilosofias/article/view/1145/pdfDireitos autorais 2016 Vitor Moreno Soliano Pereirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-21T04:36:57Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1145Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasfilosofiasONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasfilosofias/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96522525-9652opendoar:2018-02-21T04:36:57Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estado - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott A Relação Estado-Sociedade a Partir aa Filosofia Política: Um Diálogo com Edmund Burke e Michael Oakeshott |
title |
The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott |
spellingShingle |
The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott Pereira, Vitor Moreno Soliano Edmund burke;Michael oakeshott;Small platoons;Civil association;Enterprise association Edmund burke;Michael oakeshott;Pequenos pelotões;Associação civil;Associação empresarial |
title_short |
The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott |
title_full |
The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott |
title_fullStr |
The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott |
title_full_unstemmed |
The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott |
title_sort |
The State-Society Relationship Through the Perspective of Political Philosophy: A Dialogue with Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott |
author |
Pereira, Vitor Moreno Soliano |
author_facet |
Pereira, Vitor Moreno Soliano |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Vitor Moreno Soliano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Edmund burke;Michael oakeshott;Small platoons;Civil association;Enterprise association Edmund burke;Michael oakeshott;Pequenos pelotões;Associação civil;Associação empresarial |
topic |
Edmund burke;Michael oakeshott;Small platoons;Civil association;Enterprise association Edmund burke;Michael oakeshott;Pequenos pelotões;Associação civil;Associação empresarial |
description |
The essay faces the traditional question about the type of relationship that should exist between civil society and state. Initially, unpacks the characteristics that mark the Anglo- American tradition. Following analyzes the thought of two fundamental political philosophers who have received little attention in the academic community: Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott. Separated by more than two centuries, the authors advocate a specific type of relationship between civil society and state from similar assumptions, advocating for the existence of a society unmediated by state structures. Concludes with the attempted refutation of the "fallacy of planning." |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasfilosofias/article/view/1145 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9652/2016.v2i1.1145 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasfilosofias/article/view/1145 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9652/2016.v2i1.1145 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasfilosofias/article/view/1145/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Vitor Moreno Soliano Pereira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Vitor Moreno Soliano Pereira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estado; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 92 - 111 2525-9652 2525-9652 reponame:Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estado instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estado |
collection |
Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estado |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Teorias e Filosofias do Estado - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798316865000308736 |