Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of Judge
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/222 |
Resumo: | Very current theme is the extent and the limits assigned to the judge in the Law building process. And are based, the central premise, the alleged overcoming the dogmatic character of law, which raises the neutrality of the judge as one of its characteristics, and questioned the positivist method, began to emerge modern currents, antidogmáticas, and forswore the extreme positivism defended the school of exegesis. Classified as modern schools, such systems are represented by schools of free inquiry, free and historical and evolutionary law. Assimilated, some of them by the national legal experience, this article will address, in a very superficial way, the clash caught between the dogmatic and legal zetética for presenting the central issue: equivalence of the right to law, to present the main doctrines on the subject. Will make some considerations about the rationalist and realist tendencies, after criticizing the doctrine of Kantorowicz, which seems unabated certain acceptance in the national legal scenario, conclude that the judge can not be emancipated, completely, the law. |
id |
CONPEDI-18_ff6a81e94543dc570db5f7df74ee0aed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/222 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-18 |
network_name_str |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of JudgeExperiência Jurídica Brasileira: Racionalismo, Realismo e a Função Criadora do JuizInterpretation; Schools; Rationalism; Realism; The free law schoolInterpretação; Escolas; Racionalismo; Realismo; Escola do direito livreVery current theme is the extent and the limits assigned to the judge in the Law building process. And are based, the central premise, the alleged overcoming the dogmatic character of law, which raises the neutrality of the judge as one of its characteristics, and questioned the positivist method, began to emerge modern currents, antidogmáticas, and forswore the extreme positivism defended the school of exegesis. Classified as modern schools, such systems are represented by schools of free inquiry, free and historical and evolutionary law. Assimilated, some of them by the national legal experience, this article will address, in a very superficial way, the clash caught between the dogmatic and legal zetética for presenting the central issue: equivalence of the right to law, to present the main doctrines on the subject. Will make some considerations about the rationalist and realist tendencies, after criticizing the doctrine of Kantorowicz, which seems unabated certain acceptance in the national legal scenario, conclude that the judge can not be emancipated, completely, the law.Tema bastante atual é o grau e os limites atribuídos ao juiz no processo de construção do Direito. Pautando-se, a premissa central, na suposta superação do caráter dogmático do direito, que eleva a neutralidade do juiz como um de seus característicos, e questionado o método positivista, começaram a despontar correntes modernas, antidogmáticas, e que renegavam o positivismo extremado defendido pela escola da exegese. Classificados como escolas modernas, tais sistemas são representados pelas escolas da livre indagação, do direito livre e histórico-evolutiva. Assimiladas, algumas delas, pela experiência jurídica nacional, este artigo abordará, de maneira superficial, o embate travado entre a dogmática e a zetética jurídica para, apresentando a questão central: equivalência do direito à lei, tecer considerações acerca das principais doutrinas sobre o tema. Após, fará alguns comentários sobre as tendências racionalistas e realistas para, ao fim, criticando a doutrina de Kantorowicz, que parece grassar certa aceitação no cenário jurídico nacional, concluir que o juiz não pode se emancipar, por completo, da lei.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIAngella, Fábio LuizCarra, Cesar Augusto2015-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/22210.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9601/2015.v1i1.222Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 155-1682525-96012525-9601reponame:Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídicoinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/222/224Direitos autorais 2016 Fábio Luiz Angella, Cesar Augusto Carrahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-18T03:25:09Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/222Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/indexPRIhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96012525-9601opendoar:2018-02-18T03:25:09Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of Judge Experiência Jurídica Brasileira: Racionalismo, Realismo e a Função Criadora do Juiz |
title |
Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of Judge |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of Judge Angella, Fábio Luiz Interpretation; Schools; Rationalism; Realism; The free law school Interpretação; Escolas; Racionalismo; Realismo; Escola do direito livre |
title_short |
Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of Judge |
title_full |
Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of Judge |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of Judge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of Judge |
title_sort |
Brazilian Legal Experience: Rationalism , Realism and the Creator Function of Judge |
author |
Angella, Fábio Luiz |
author_facet |
Angella, Fábio Luiz Carra, Cesar Augusto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carra, Cesar Augusto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Angella, Fábio Luiz Carra, Cesar Augusto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Interpretation; Schools; Rationalism; Realism; The free law school Interpretação; Escolas; Racionalismo; Realismo; Escola do direito livre |
topic |
Interpretation; Schools; Rationalism; Realism; The free law school Interpretação; Escolas; Racionalismo; Realismo; Escola do direito livre |
description |
Very current theme is the extent and the limits assigned to the judge in the Law building process. And are based, the central premise, the alleged overcoming the dogmatic character of law, which raises the neutrality of the judge as one of its characteristics, and questioned the positivist method, began to emerge modern currents, antidogmáticas, and forswore the extreme positivism defended the school of exegesis. Classified as modern schools, such systems are represented by schools of free inquiry, free and historical and evolutionary law. Assimilated, some of them by the national legal experience, this article will address, in a very superficial way, the clash caught between the dogmatic and legal zetética for presenting the central issue: equivalence of the right to law, to present the main doctrines on the subject. Will make some considerations about the rationalist and realist tendencies, after criticizing the doctrine of Kantorowicz, which seems unabated certain acceptance in the national legal scenario, conclude that the judge can not be emancipated, completely, the law. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/222 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9601/2015.v1i1.222 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/222 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9601/2015.v1i1.222 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/222/224 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Fábio Luiz Angella, Cesar Augusto Carra http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Fábio Luiz Angella, Cesar Augusto Carra http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 155-168 2525-9601 2525-9601 reponame:Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico |
collection |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798316734430576640 |