THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectiva |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/direitocivil/article/view/720 |
Resumo: | Debates about the refusal of medical treatment emerge from the exercise of patients autonomy. In relation to this possibility applied to children and adolescents the situation proves complex because, although they have their personality rights safeguarded, lack the legal capacity to make decisions. Such questions go through the analysis of the extent and limits of parental authority in the face of the child and adolescent autonomy. The parental decision-making must observe, on the one hand, the duty of care inherent in parental authority and on the other, the autonomy of the smaller within the limits outlined by the law, in particular the Statute of Children and Adolescents. As human beings in the development process, the child and adolescent have the right to liberty, respect and dignity, among others (Art.15, Statute of Children and Adolescents). In this sense, this study presents us with cases like Hannah Jones and Reece Puddington, where, despite the young age, opted for refusing cancer treatment. This paper analyzes the Gillick case, occurred in England, which brought the Gillicks Competence as a parameter to determine the discernment of person under sixteen years, verifying the possibility of their use by Brazilian law. To realize this study, will be used to theoretical research. In turn, the method to be used in the search will be through the monographic study and legislative works that addressed the issue of refusal of medical treatment for children and adolescents. The technique to be employed in carrying out the research will be thematic and textual analysis, obtaining concepts and theories already formulated on the subject and capturing the most relevant issues of the same. |
id |
CONPEDI-26_8990b291b7e1ecc64985f043e94a696b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/720 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-26 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectiva |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCEA RECUSA DE TRATAMENTO MÉDICO POR CRIANÇAS E ADOLESCENTES: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DA COMPETÊNCIA DE GILLICKGillicks competence, Refuse of medical treatment, Children and adolescents, Parental authorityCompetência de gillick, Recusa de tratamento médico, Criança e adolescente, Autoridade parentalDebates about the refusal of medical treatment emerge from the exercise of patients autonomy. In relation to this possibility applied to children and adolescents the situation proves complex because, although they have their personality rights safeguarded, lack the legal capacity to make decisions. Such questions go through the analysis of the extent and limits of parental authority in the face of the child and adolescent autonomy. The parental decision-making must observe, on the one hand, the duty of care inherent in parental authority and on the other, the autonomy of the smaller within the limits outlined by the law, in particular the Statute of Children and Adolescents. As human beings in the development process, the child and adolescent have the right to liberty, respect and dignity, among others (Art.15, Statute of Children and Adolescents). In this sense, this study presents us with cases like Hannah Jones and Reece Puddington, where, despite the young age, opted for refusing cancer treatment. This paper analyzes the Gillick case, occurred in England, which brought the Gillicks Competence as a parameter to determine the discernment of person under sixteen years, verifying the possibility of their use by Brazilian law. To realize this study, will be used to theoretical research. In turn, the method to be used in the search will be through the monographic study and legislative works that addressed the issue of refusal of medical treatment for children and adolescents. The technique to be employed in carrying out the research will be thematic and textual analysis, obtaining concepts and theories already formulated on the subject and capturing the most relevant issues of the same.Os debates acerca da recusa de tratamento médico surgem do exercício da autonomia do paciente. Em relação a esta possibilidade aplicada para crianças e adolescentes a situação se mostra complexa porquanto, apesar de terem seus direitos da personalidade resguardados, não possuem a capacidade civil para tomada de decisões. Tais questões passam pela análise da extensão e limites da autoridade parental em face da autonomia da criança e do adolescente. A tomada de decisão pelos pais deve observar, de um lado, o dever de cuidado inerente à autoridade parental e, de outro, a autonomia do menor nos limites delineados pela ordem jurídica, em especial o Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. Como pessoa humana em processo de desenvolvimento, a criança e o adolescente têm direito à liberdade, ao respeito e à dignidade, entre outros (art.15, Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente). Nesse sentido, o cotidiano nos apresenta casos como Hannah Jones e Reece Puddington, em que, apesar da tenra idade, optaram pela recusa de tratamento do câncer. Este trabalho pretende analisar o Caso Gillick, ocorrido na Inglaterra, que trouxe a competência de Gillick como parâmetro para se apurar o discernimento de pessoa menor de dezesseis anos, verificando a possibilidade de sua utilização pelo ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Para concretizar o presente estudo, utilizar-se-á a pesquisa teórica. Por sua vez, o método a ser empregado na pesquisa será através do estudo monográfico e legislativo de obras que trataram a temática da recusa de tratamento médico por crianças e adolescentes. A técnica a ser empregada na realização da pesquisa será de análise temática e textual, obtendo conceitos e teorias já formuladas sobre o assunto e captando as problemáticas mais relevantes do mesmo.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDISillmann, Marina Carneiro MatosSá, Maria de Fátima Freire2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/direitocivil/article/view/72010.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0243/2015.v1i1.720Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectiva; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO2526-02432526-0243reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectivainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/direitocivil/article/view/720/715Direitos autorais 2016 Marina Carneiro Matos Sillmann, Maria de Fátima Freire Sáhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-18T03:15:18Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/720Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/direitocivilONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/direitocivil/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br2526-02432526-0243opendoar:2018-02-18T03:15:18Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectiva - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCE A RECUSA DE TRATAMENTO MÉDICO POR CRIANÇAS E ADOLESCENTES: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DA COMPETÊNCIA DE GILLICK |
title |
THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCE |
spellingShingle |
THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCE Sillmann, Marina Carneiro Matos Gillicks competence, Refuse of medical treatment, Children and adolescents, Parental authority Competência de gillick, Recusa de tratamento médico, Criança e adolescente, Autoridade parental |
title_short |
THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCE |
title_full |
THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCE |
title_fullStr |
THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCE |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCE |
title_sort |
THE REFUSE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE GILLICKS COMPETENCE |
author |
Sillmann, Marina Carneiro Matos |
author_facet |
Sillmann, Marina Carneiro Matos Sá, Maria de Fátima Freire |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sá, Maria de Fátima Freire |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sillmann, Marina Carneiro Matos Sá, Maria de Fátima Freire |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gillicks competence, Refuse of medical treatment, Children and adolescents, Parental authority Competência de gillick, Recusa de tratamento médico, Criança e adolescente, Autoridade parental |
topic |
Gillicks competence, Refuse of medical treatment, Children and adolescents, Parental authority Competência de gillick, Recusa de tratamento médico, Criança e adolescente, Autoridade parental |
description |
Debates about the refusal of medical treatment emerge from the exercise of patients autonomy. In relation to this possibility applied to children and adolescents the situation proves complex because, although they have their personality rights safeguarded, lack the legal capacity to make decisions. Such questions go through the analysis of the extent and limits of parental authority in the face of the child and adolescent autonomy. The parental decision-making must observe, on the one hand, the duty of care inherent in parental authority and on the other, the autonomy of the smaller within the limits outlined by the law, in particular the Statute of Children and Adolescents. As human beings in the development process, the child and adolescent have the right to liberty, respect and dignity, among others (Art.15, Statute of Children and Adolescents). In this sense, this study presents us with cases like Hannah Jones and Reece Puddington, where, despite the young age, opted for refusing cancer treatment. This paper analyzes the Gillick case, occurred in England, which brought the Gillicks Competence as a parameter to determine the discernment of person under sixteen years, verifying the possibility of their use by Brazilian law. To realize this study, will be used to theoretical research. In turn, the method to be used in the search will be through the monographic study and legislative works that addressed the issue of refusal of medical treatment for children and adolescents. The technique to be employed in carrying out the research will be thematic and textual analysis, obtaining concepts and theories already formulated on the subject and capturing the most relevant issues of the same. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/direitocivil/article/view/720 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0243/2015.v1i1.720 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/direitocivil/article/view/720 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0243/2015.v1i1.720 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/direitocivil/article/view/720/715 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Marina Carneiro Matos Sillmann, Maria de Fátima Freire Sá http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Marina Carneiro Matos Sillmann, Maria de Fátima Freire Sá http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectiva; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO 2526-0243 2526-0243 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectiva instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectiva |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectiva |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em Perspectiva - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br |
_version_ |
1798314910029971456 |