JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Iensue, Geziela
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Sgarbossa, Luis Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3001
Resumo: The political responsibility of governments and of public officers, elected or not, it is subject that generates controversies and uncertainties in theoretical discussions and political and legal debates. Among the various aspects of the political responsibility of public officials and the instruments of its achievement is stormy the problem about the feasibility of its judicial review. This article proposes to examine the impact of different institutional environments in terms of political responsibility to propose some answers to this problem. It intends to demonstrate that destitutory decisions in political-legal judgment in systems that adopt the impeachment are exceptionally permissible to judicial review, but the same does not apply to other types of destitutory decisions, such as those arising from ministerial responsibility in parliamentarism and those arising from revocatory referendum, at least in principle.
id CONPEDI-34_37e34d9520038db21695a8ea6cf69b80
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3001
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-34
network_name_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGSREVISIBILIDADE JUDICIAL DE DECISÕES DESTITUINTES RESULTANTES DE RESPONSABILIDADE POLÍTICA: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DE DIFERENTES CONTEXTOS INSTITUCIONAISPolitical responsibility. Destitutory decisions. Judicial review.Responsabilidade política. Decisões destituintes. Revisão judicial.The political responsibility of governments and of public officers, elected or not, it is subject that generates controversies and uncertainties in theoretical discussions and political and legal debates. Among the various aspects of the political responsibility of public officials and the instruments of its achievement is stormy the problem about the feasibility of its judicial review. This article proposes to examine the impact of different institutional environments in terms of political responsibility to propose some answers to this problem. It intends to demonstrate that destitutory decisions in political-legal judgment in systems that adopt the impeachment are exceptionally permissible to judicial review, but the same does not apply to other types of destitutory decisions, such as those arising from ministerial responsibility in parliamentarism and those arising from revocatory referendum, at least in principle.A responsabilidade política de governantes e detentores de cargos públicos, eletivos ou não, é tema que suscita controvérsias e incertezas em discussões teóricas e em debates políticos e jurídicos. Entre os diversos aspectos relativos à referida responsabilidade e aos instrumentos de sua consecução encontra-se o tormentoso problema da viabilidade de sua revisão judicial. O presente artigo se propõe a examinar o impacto de diferentes ambientes institucionais em termos de promoção de responsabilidade política para sugerir algumas respostas para o referido problema. Pretende-se demonstrar que as decisões destituintes proferidas em juízo político-jurídico nos sistemas que adotam o impeachment são passíveis de revisão judicial, embora excepcionalmente. Pretende-se demonstrar, ainda, que o mesmo não se aplica a outros tipos de decisões destituintes, como as decorrentes de responsabilidade ministerial no parlamentarismo, e as decorrentes de referendo revocatório, pelo menos em princípio, ressalvadas situações excepcionais.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIIensue, GezielaSgarbossa, Luis Fernando2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/300110.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2016.v14i6.3001Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 14, n. 6 (2016); 264-2852358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3001/2767info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-17T01:31:40Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3001Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-17T01:31:40Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS
REVISIBILIDADE JUDICIAL DE DECISÕES DESTITUINTES RESULTANTES DE RESPONSABILIDADE POLÍTICA: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DE DIFERENTES CONTEXTOS INSTITUCIONAIS
title JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS
spellingShingle JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS
Iensue, Geziela
Political responsibility. Destitutory decisions. Judicial review.
Responsabilidade política. Decisões destituintes. Revisão judicial.
title_short JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS
title_full JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS
title_fullStr JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS
title_full_unstemmed JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS
title_sort JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DESTITUTORY DECISIONS ARISING OUT POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN ANALYSIS FROM DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS
author Iensue, Geziela
author_facet Iensue, Geziela
Sgarbossa, Luis Fernando
author_role author
author2 Sgarbossa, Luis Fernando
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Iensue, Geziela
Sgarbossa, Luis Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Political responsibility. Destitutory decisions. Judicial review.
Responsabilidade política. Decisões destituintes. Revisão judicial.
topic Political responsibility. Destitutory decisions. Judicial review.
Responsabilidade política. Decisões destituintes. Revisão judicial.
description The political responsibility of governments and of public officers, elected or not, it is subject that generates controversies and uncertainties in theoretical discussions and political and legal debates. Among the various aspects of the political responsibility of public officials and the instruments of its achievement is stormy the problem about the feasibility of its judicial review. This article proposes to examine the impact of different institutional environments in terms of political responsibility to propose some answers to this problem. It intends to demonstrate that destitutory decisions in political-legal judgment in systems that adopt the impeachment are exceptionally permissible to judicial review, but the same does not apply to other types of destitutory decisions, such as those arising from ministerial responsibility in parliamentarism and those arising from revocatory referendum, at least in principle.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3001
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2016.v14i6.3001
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3001
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2016.v14i6.3001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3001/2767
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 14, n. 6 (2016); 264-285
2358-1352
2237-583X
reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistardb@gmail.com
_version_ 1803388908154650624

Registros relacionados