The faithlessness in the commercial communications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Millán, Eva Cordobés
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917
Resumo: The definition of the concept of “commercial practices with consumersand users” can be found in the second record of the article 19.2 TRLGDCU and isdefined as every commercial act, omission, behavior, manifestation or communication, including advertising and merchandising. Hence the importance of delimiting what has to be meant by commercial communication. To be able to analyze the commercial communications by the point of view of their untrustworthiness towards the consumer and the user it is essential delimiting the meaning of the word by means of the examination of both the European regulation of the commercial (the Green Book on the commercial communications in the internal market and the Directive on electronic commerce) and the national one (LODC and LSSICE among others). In the meanwhile, it is necessary to differentiate the two great kinds of commercial communications actually used: the electronic commercial communications and the non-electronic ones. After having conducted a legislative analysis, supported by several doctrinarian and jurisprudential studies, we will focus on the untrustworthiness of the electronic commercial communications. We will particularly highlight, devoting to it the greatest part of this study, the commercial unfair practice that is regulated by the article 29 LCD. This is so because the aforementioned article regulates the aggressive commercial practices in the case of harassment brought about through electronic media, a situation identical to the one regulated by the LSSICE. For this reason it emerges a special interest in the observation of the connections and, especially, of the functional and ruling autonomy of the two precepts. Finally, through the STJUE of 2011, May the 12 (record C-122/10) we analyze the untrustworthy electronic commercial communications whose untrustworthiness in caused, this time, by an omission of information.
id CONPEDI-34_4f0edec90e080654d28c9cac02860833
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2917
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-34
network_name_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The faithlessness in the commercial communicationsLa deslealtad en las comunicaciones comercialesLa deslealtad en las comunicaciones comercialesCommercial unfair practices. Commercial communicati ons. Consumer protection.Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.The definition of the concept of “commercial practices with consumersand users” can be found in the second record of the article 19.2 TRLGDCU and isdefined as every commercial act, omission, behavior, manifestation or communication, including advertising and merchandising. Hence the importance of delimiting what has to be meant by commercial communication. To be able to analyze the commercial communications by the point of view of their untrustworthiness towards the consumer and the user it is essential delimiting the meaning of the word by means of the examination of both the European regulation of the commercial (the Green Book on the commercial communications in the internal market and the Directive on electronic commerce) and the national one (LODC and LSSICE among others). In the meanwhile, it is necessary to differentiate the two great kinds of commercial communications actually used: the electronic commercial communications and the non-electronic ones. After having conducted a legislative analysis, supported by several doctrinarian and jurisprudential studies, we will focus on the untrustworthiness of the electronic commercial communications. We will particularly highlight, devoting to it the greatest part of this study, the commercial unfair practice that is regulated by the article 29 LCD. This is so because the aforementioned article regulates the aggressive commercial practices in the case of harassment brought about through electronic media, a situation identical to the one regulated by the LSSICE. For this reason it emerges a special interest in the observation of the connections and, especially, of the functional and ruling autonomy of the two precepts. Finally, through the STJUE of 2011, May the 12 (record C-122/10) we analyze the untrustworthy electronic commercial communications whose untrustworthiness in caused, this time, by an omission of information.La definición del concepto de “prácticas comerciales con los consumidoresy usuarios” se encuentra en el inciso segundo del art. 19.2 TRLGDCU y se identifica con todo acto, omisión, conducta, manifestación o comunicación comercial, incluida la publicidad y la comercialización. De ahí la relevancia de delimitar qué debemos entender por comunicación comercial. Para poder analizar las comunicaciones comerciales desde su deslealtad hacia el consumidor y usuario resulta imprescindible delimitar el término mediante el examen de la normativa reguladora de las comunicaciones comerciales europea (Libro Verde sobre las comunicaciones comerciales en el Mercado Interior y Directiva sobre el comercio electrónico) y nacional (LODC y LSSICE, entre otras). Asimismo, resulta necesario diferenciar los dos grandes tipos de comunicaciones comerciales existentes en la praxis: las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas y las no electrónicas. Tras un estudio legislativo, complementado con estudios doctrinales y jurisprudenciales, de ambas tipologías de comunicaciones nos centramos en la deslealtad de las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas. Se destaca, dedicando gran parte expositiva del presente estudio, la práctica comercial desleal regulada en el art. 29 LCD. Ello es así porque el mencionado precepto regula las prácticas comerciales agresivas por acoso efectuadas por medios a distancia, supuesto de hecho idéntico al previsto por la LSSICE. Por este motivo, emerge un especial interés en observar las conexiones y, especialmente, la autonomía funcionaly aplicativa de ambas normativas. Finalmente, mediante la STJUE de 12 de mayode 2011 (asunto C-122/10) analizamos las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas engañosas, en este caso, por omisión de información.La definición del concepto de “prácticas comerciales con los consumidoresy usuarios” se encuentra en el inciso segundo del art. 19.2 TRLGDCU y se identificacon todo acto, omisión, conducta, manifestación o comunicación comercial, incluidala publicidad y la comercialización. De ahí la relevancia de delimitar qué debemos entender por comunicación comercial. Para poder analizar las comunicaciones comerciales desde su deslealtad hacia el consumidor y usuario resulta imprescindible delimitar el término mediante el examen de la normativa reguladora de las comunicaciones comerciales europea (Libro Verde sobre las comunicaciones comerciales en el Mercado Interior y Directiva sobre el comercio electrónico) y nacional (LODC y LSSICE, entre otras). Asimismo, resulta necesario diferenciar los dos grandes tipos de comunicaciones comerciales existentes en la praxis: las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas y las no electrónicas. Tras un estudio legislativo, complementado con estudios doctrinales y jurisprudenciales, de ambas tipologías de comunicaciones nos centramos en la deslealtad de las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas. Se destaca, dedicando gran parte expositiva del presente estudio, la práctica comercial desleal regulada en el art. 29 LCD. Ello es así porque el mencionado precepto regula las prácticas comerciales agresivas por acoso efectuadas por medios a distancia, supuesto de hecho idéntico al previsto por la LSSICE. Por este motivo, emerge un especial interés en observar las conexiones y, especialmente, la autonomía funcionaly aplicativa de ambas normativas. Finalmente, mediante la STJUE de 12 de mayode 2011 (asunto C-122/10) analizamos las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas engañosas, en este caso, por omisión de información.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIMillán, Eva Cordobés2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/291710.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2014.v9i4.2917Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 9, n. 4 (2014); 62-812358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917/2710info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-17T01:34:25Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2917Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-17T01:34:25Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The faithlessness in the commercial communications
La deslealtad en las comunicaciones comerciales
La deslealtad en las comunicaciones comerciales
title The faithlessness in the commercial communications
spellingShingle The faithlessness in the commercial communications
Millán, Eva Cordobés
Commercial unfair practices. Commercial communicati ons. Consumer protection.
Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.
Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.
title_short The faithlessness in the commercial communications
title_full The faithlessness in the commercial communications
title_fullStr The faithlessness in the commercial communications
title_full_unstemmed The faithlessness in the commercial communications
title_sort The faithlessness in the commercial communications
author Millán, Eva Cordobés
author_facet Millán, Eva Cordobés
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Millán, Eva Cordobés
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Commercial unfair practices. Commercial communicati ons. Consumer protection.
Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.
Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.
topic Commercial unfair practices. Commercial communicati ons. Consumer protection.
Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.
Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.
description The definition of the concept of “commercial practices with consumersand users” can be found in the second record of the article 19.2 TRLGDCU and isdefined as every commercial act, omission, behavior, manifestation or communication, including advertising and merchandising. Hence the importance of delimiting what has to be meant by commercial communication. To be able to analyze the commercial communications by the point of view of their untrustworthiness towards the consumer and the user it is essential delimiting the meaning of the word by means of the examination of both the European regulation of the commercial (the Green Book on the commercial communications in the internal market and the Directive on electronic commerce) and the national one (LODC and LSSICE among others). In the meanwhile, it is necessary to differentiate the two great kinds of commercial communications actually used: the electronic commercial communications and the non-electronic ones. After having conducted a legislative analysis, supported by several doctrinarian and jurisprudential studies, we will focus on the untrustworthiness of the electronic commercial communications. We will particularly highlight, devoting to it the greatest part of this study, the commercial unfair practice that is regulated by the article 29 LCD. This is so because the aforementioned article regulates the aggressive commercial practices in the case of harassment brought about through electronic media, a situation identical to the one regulated by the LSSICE. For this reason it emerges a special interest in the observation of the connections and, especially, of the functional and ruling autonomy of the two precepts. Finally, through the STJUE of 2011, May the 12 (record C-122/10) we analyze the untrustworthy electronic commercial communications whose untrustworthiness in caused, this time, by an omission of information.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2014.v9i4.2917
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2014.v9i4.2917
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917/2710
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 9, n. 4 (2014); 62-81
2358-1352
2237-583X
reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistardb@gmail.com
_version_ 1803388910717370368