The faithlessness in the commercial communications
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917 |
Resumo: | The definition of the concept of “commercial practices with consumersand users” can be found in the second record of the article 19.2 TRLGDCU and isdefined as every commercial act, omission, behavior, manifestation or communication, including advertising and merchandising. Hence the importance of delimiting what has to be meant by commercial communication. To be able to analyze the commercial communications by the point of view of their untrustworthiness towards the consumer and the user it is essential delimiting the meaning of the word by means of the examination of both the European regulation of the commercial (the Green Book on the commercial communications in the internal market and the Directive on electronic commerce) and the national one (LODC and LSSICE among others). In the meanwhile, it is necessary to differentiate the two great kinds of commercial communications actually used: the electronic commercial communications and the non-electronic ones. After having conducted a legislative analysis, supported by several doctrinarian and jurisprudential studies, we will focus on the untrustworthiness of the electronic commercial communications. We will particularly highlight, devoting to it the greatest part of this study, the commercial unfair practice that is regulated by the article 29 LCD. This is so because the aforementioned article regulates the aggressive commercial practices in the case of harassment brought about through electronic media, a situation identical to the one regulated by the LSSICE. For this reason it emerges a special interest in the observation of the connections and, especially, of the functional and ruling autonomy of the two precepts. Finally, through the STJUE of 2011, May the 12 (record C-122/10) we analyze the untrustworthy electronic commercial communications whose untrustworthiness in caused, this time, by an omission of information. |
id |
CONPEDI-34_4f0edec90e080654d28c9cac02860833 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2917 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-34 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The faithlessness in the commercial communicationsLa deslealtad en las comunicaciones comercialesLa deslealtad en las comunicaciones comercialesCommercial unfair practices. Commercial communicati ons. Consumer protection.Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor.The definition of the concept of “commercial practices with consumersand users” can be found in the second record of the article 19.2 TRLGDCU and isdefined as every commercial act, omission, behavior, manifestation or communication, including advertising and merchandising. Hence the importance of delimiting what has to be meant by commercial communication. To be able to analyze the commercial communications by the point of view of their untrustworthiness towards the consumer and the user it is essential delimiting the meaning of the word by means of the examination of both the European regulation of the commercial (the Green Book on the commercial communications in the internal market and the Directive on electronic commerce) and the national one (LODC and LSSICE among others). In the meanwhile, it is necessary to differentiate the two great kinds of commercial communications actually used: the electronic commercial communications and the non-electronic ones. After having conducted a legislative analysis, supported by several doctrinarian and jurisprudential studies, we will focus on the untrustworthiness of the electronic commercial communications. We will particularly highlight, devoting to it the greatest part of this study, the commercial unfair practice that is regulated by the article 29 LCD. This is so because the aforementioned article regulates the aggressive commercial practices in the case of harassment brought about through electronic media, a situation identical to the one regulated by the LSSICE. For this reason it emerges a special interest in the observation of the connections and, especially, of the functional and ruling autonomy of the two precepts. Finally, through the STJUE of 2011, May the 12 (record C-122/10) we analyze the untrustworthy electronic commercial communications whose untrustworthiness in caused, this time, by an omission of information.La definición del concepto de “prácticas comerciales con los consumidoresy usuarios” se encuentra en el inciso segundo del art. 19.2 TRLGDCU y se identifica con todo acto, omisión, conducta, manifestación o comunicación comercial, incluida la publicidad y la comercialización. De ahí la relevancia de delimitar qué debemos entender por comunicación comercial. Para poder analizar las comunicaciones comerciales desde su deslealtad hacia el consumidor y usuario resulta imprescindible delimitar el término mediante el examen de la normativa reguladora de las comunicaciones comerciales europea (Libro Verde sobre las comunicaciones comerciales en el Mercado Interior y Directiva sobre el comercio electrónico) y nacional (LODC y LSSICE, entre otras). Asimismo, resulta necesario diferenciar los dos grandes tipos de comunicaciones comerciales existentes en la praxis: las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas y las no electrónicas. Tras un estudio legislativo, complementado con estudios doctrinales y jurisprudenciales, de ambas tipologías de comunicaciones nos centramos en la deslealtad de las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas. Se destaca, dedicando gran parte expositiva del presente estudio, la práctica comercial desleal regulada en el art. 29 LCD. Ello es así porque el mencionado precepto regula las prácticas comerciales agresivas por acoso efectuadas por medios a distancia, supuesto de hecho idéntico al previsto por la LSSICE. Por este motivo, emerge un especial interés en observar las conexiones y, especialmente, la autonomía funcionaly aplicativa de ambas normativas. Finalmente, mediante la STJUE de 12 de mayode 2011 (asunto C-122/10) analizamos las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas engañosas, en este caso, por omisión de información.La definición del concepto de “prácticas comerciales con los consumidoresy usuarios” se encuentra en el inciso segundo del art. 19.2 TRLGDCU y se identificacon todo acto, omisión, conducta, manifestación o comunicación comercial, incluidala publicidad y la comercialización. De ahí la relevancia de delimitar qué debemos entender por comunicación comercial. Para poder analizar las comunicaciones comerciales desde su deslealtad hacia el consumidor y usuario resulta imprescindible delimitar el término mediante el examen de la normativa reguladora de las comunicaciones comerciales europea (Libro Verde sobre las comunicaciones comerciales en el Mercado Interior y Directiva sobre el comercio electrónico) y nacional (LODC y LSSICE, entre otras). Asimismo, resulta necesario diferenciar los dos grandes tipos de comunicaciones comerciales existentes en la praxis: las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas y las no electrónicas. Tras un estudio legislativo, complementado con estudios doctrinales y jurisprudenciales, de ambas tipologías de comunicaciones nos centramos en la deslealtad de las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas. Se destaca, dedicando gran parte expositiva del presente estudio, la práctica comercial desleal regulada en el art. 29 LCD. Ello es así porque el mencionado precepto regula las prácticas comerciales agresivas por acoso efectuadas por medios a distancia, supuesto de hecho idéntico al previsto por la LSSICE. Por este motivo, emerge un especial interés en observar las conexiones y, especialmente, la autonomía funcionaly aplicativa de ambas normativas. Finalmente, mediante la STJUE de 12 de mayode 2011 (asunto C-122/10) analizamos las comunicaciones comerciales electrónicas engañosas, en este caso, por omisión de información.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIMillán, Eva Cordobés2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/291710.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2014.v9i4.2917Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 9, n. 4 (2014); 62-812358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917/2710info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-17T01:34:25Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2917Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-17T01:34:25Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The faithlessness in the commercial communications La deslealtad en las comunicaciones comerciales La deslealtad en las comunicaciones comerciales |
title |
The faithlessness in the commercial communications |
spellingShingle |
The faithlessness in the commercial communications Millán, Eva Cordobés Commercial unfair practices. Commercial communicati ons. Consumer protection. Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor. Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor. |
title_short |
The faithlessness in the commercial communications |
title_full |
The faithlessness in the commercial communications |
title_fullStr |
The faithlessness in the commercial communications |
title_full_unstemmed |
The faithlessness in the commercial communications |
title_sort |
The faithlessness in the commercial communications |
author |
Millán, Eva Cordobés |
author_facet |
Millán, Eva Cordobés |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Millán, Eva Cordobés |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Commercial unfair practices. Commercial communicati ons. Consumer protection. Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor. Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor. |
topic |
Commercial unfair practices. Commercial communicati ons. Consumer protection. Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor. Práctica comercial desleal. Comunicación comercial. Tutela del consumidor. |
description |
The definition of the concept of “commercial practices with consumersand users” can be found in the second record of the article 19.2 TRLGDCU and isdefined as every commercial act, omission, behavior, manifestation or communication, including advertising and merchandising. Hence the importance of delimiting what has to be meant by commercial communication. To be able to analyze the commercial communications by the point of view of their untrustworthiness towards the consumer and the user it is essential delimiting the meaning of the word by means of the examination of both the European regulation of the commercial (the Green Book on the commercial communications in the internal market and the Directive on electronic commerce) and the national one (LODC and LSSICE among others). In the meanwhile, it is necessary to differentiate the two great kinds of commercial communications actually used: the electronic commercial communications and the non-electronic ones. After having conducted a legislative analysis, supported by several doctrinarian and jurisprudential studies, we will focus on the untrustworthiness of the electronic commercial communications. We will particularly highlight, devoting to it the greatest part of this study, the commercial unfair practice that is regulated by the article 29 LCD. This is so because the aforementioned article regulates the aggressive commercial practices in the case of harassment brought about through electronic media, a situation identical to the one regulated by the LSSICE. For this reason it emerges a special interest in the observation of the connections and, especially, of the functional and ruling autonomy of the two precepts. Finally, through the STJUE of 2011, May the 12 (record C-122/10) we analyze the untrustworthy electronic commercial communications whose untrustworthiness in caused, this time, by an omission of information. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2014.v9i4.2917 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2014.v9i4.2917 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2917/2710 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 9, n. 4 (2014); 62-81 2358-1352 2237-583X reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistardb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803388910717370368 |