PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISON

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Portal, Daniela Chies
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gloeckner, Ricardo Jacobsen
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3074
Resumo: This article intends to discuss the impact caused by the recent interpretation turn from STF about the limits, meaning and reach of the beyond reasonable doubt clause. Starting with the comprehension that the beyond reasonable doubt clause is a principle, from which can be extracted three normative kind (judicial, evidentiary and treatment subprinciples), it was analyzed the “treatment subprinciple”, identifying in the STF decision, a set of arguments that indicates a repressive attitude of the court. Besides, it was verified that those arguments used by judges, are, majoritarily, epistemologically untenable, especially from a democratic criminal procedure view.
id CONPEDI-34_908251fd6ae734e73c3328a153e8c33f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3074
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-34
network_name_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISONPRESUNÇÃO DE INOCÊNCIA NO HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JULGADO PELO STF: STANDARDS DECISÓRIOS E O ADVENTO DA PRISÃO CAUTELAR OBRIGATÓRIAcriminal procedure; beyond reasonable doubt clause; STF.processo penal; presunção de inocência; STF.This article intends to discuss the impact caused by the recent interpretation turn from STF about the limits, meaning and reach of the beyond reasonable doubt clause. Starting with the comprehension that the beyond reasonable doubt clause is a principle, from which can be extracted three normative kind (judicial, evidentiary and treatment subprinciples), it was analyzed the “treatment subprinciple”, identifying in the STF decision, a set of arguments that indicates a repressive attitude of the court. Besides, it was verified that those arguments used by judges, are, majoritarily, epistemologically untenable, especially from a democratic criminal procedure view.O artigo pretende discutir o impacto causado pela recente mudança de interpretação do STF quanto aos limites, sentidos e alcance do princípio da presunção de inocência. Partindo-se da compreensão de que a presunção de inocência é um princípio do qual podem ser extraídas três espécies normativas (regra de juízo, regra probatória e regra de tratamento), analisou-se o aspecto “norma de tratamento”, identificando no julgado, um conjunto de argumentos que indicam uma orientação repressivistas do tribunal. Além disso, constatou-se que tais argumentos utilizados pelos ministros, em grande parte, são epistemologicamente insustentáveis, especialmente diante de um processo penal democrático.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIPortal, Daniela ChiesGloeckner, Ricardo Jacobsen2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/307410.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v17i7.3074Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 17, n. 7 (2017); 391-4072358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3074/2800info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-16T01:28:35Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3074Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-16T01:28:35Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISON
PRESUNÇÃO DE INOCÊNCIA NO HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JULGADO PELO STF: STANDARDS DECISÓRIOS E O ADVENTO DA PRISÃO CAUTELAR OBRIGATÓRIA
title PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISON
spellingShingle PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISON
Portal, Daniela Chies
criminal procedure; beyond reasonable doubt clause; STF.
processo penal; presunção de inocência; STF.
title_short PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISON
title_full PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISON
title_fullStr PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISON
title_full_unstemmed PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISON
title_sort PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN HABEAS CORPUS N. 126.292 JUDGED BY STF: DECISION-MAKING STANDARDS AND THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY PRECAUTIONARY PRISON
author Portal, Daniela Chies
author_facet Portal, Daniela Chies
Gloeckner, Ricardo Jacobsen
author_role author
author2 Gloeckner, Ricardo Jacobsen
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Portal, Daniela Chies
Gloeckner, Ricardo Jacobsen
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv criminal procedure; beyond reasonable doubt clause; STF.
processo penal; presunção de inocência; STF.
topic criminal procedure; beyond reasonable doubt clause; STF.
processo penal; presunção de inocência; STF.
description This article intends to discuss the impact caused by the recent interpretation turn from STF about the limits, meaning and reach of the beyond reasonable doubt clause. Starting with the comprehension that the beyond reasonable doubt clause is a principle, from which can be extracted three normative kind (judicial, evidentiary and treatment subprinciples), it was analyzed the “treatment subprinciple”, identifying in the STF decision, a set of arguments that indicates a repressive attitude of the court. Besides, it was verified that those arguments used by judges, are, majoritarily, epistemologically untenable, especially from a democratic criminal procedure view.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3074
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v17i7.3074
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3074
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v17i7.3074
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3074/2800
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 17, n. 7 (2017); 391-407
2358-1352
2237-583X
reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistardb@gmail.com
_version_ 1803388908073910272

Registros relacionados