Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Rafael Speck de
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20
Resumo: This paper seeks to analyze the practice of animal testing under the paradigm of the Risk Society, Animal Rights, and in which point such research hurts the principle of equal consideration of like interests advocated by Peter Singer and other moral philosophers. On the one hand, this paper calls into question the attempt to transfer the results of an experiment with animals to reactions in humans, and the security criteria (or insecurity) adopted by science. On the other hand, an evaluation is made of how much these animal models are considered speciesist practice, which does not take into account the interests of non-human sentient species (which are capable of suffering). The historical, comparative and deductive methods have been used in order to reach the intended goals. The sources of research used are mostly bibliographical: books, papers and journals. Theoretical references adopted were the risk society theory proposed by German sociologist Ulrich Beck and the animal ethics theory advocated by the Australian philosopher Peter Singer.
id CONPEDI-3_20f64d1e656577346845c19857564a62
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/20
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-3
network_name_str Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
repository_id_str
spelling Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of InterestsExperimentação Animal na Sociedade de Risco e a Violação do Princípio da Igual Consideração de InteressesAnimal testing, Risk society, Animal rights, Animal ethics, Principle of equal consideration of like interestsExperimentação animal, Sociedade de risco, Direitos animais, Ética animal, Princípio da igual consideração de interessesThis paper seeks to analyze the practice of animal testing under the paradigm of the Risk Society, Animal Rights, and in which point such research hurts the principle of equal consideration of like interests advocated by Peter Singer and other moral philosophers. On the one hand, this paper calls into question the attempt to transfer the results of an experiment with animals to reactions in humans, and the security criteria (or insecurity) adopted by science. On the other hand, an evaluation is made of how much these animal models are considered speciesist practice, which does not take into account the interests of non-human sentient species (which are capable of suffering). The historical, comparative and deductive methods have been used in order to reach the intended goals. The sources of research used are mostly bibliographical: books, papers and journals. Theoretical references adopted were the risk society theory proposed by German sociologist Ulrich Beck and the animal ethics theory advocated by the Australian philosopher Peter Singer.O presente artigo busca analisar a prática da experimentação animal sob o paradigma da Sociedade de Risco, dos Direitos Animais, e em que ponto tais pesquisas ferem o princípio da igual consideração de interesses semelhantes, preconizado por Peter Singer e outros filósofos morais. Por um lado, coloca-se em questão o fato de se pretender transpor os resultados de um experimento com animais às reações com seres humanos, e os respectivos critérios de segurança (ou insegurança) adotados pela ciência. Por outro lado, avalia-se o quanto tais modelos animais são considerados uma prática especista, que não leva em consideração os interesses de espécies não humanas sencientes (que possuem a capacidade de sofrer). Para a obtenção dos objetivos colimados utilizar-se-á o método histórico, comparativo e dedutivo. Serão utilizados como fontes de pesquisa, eminentemente bibliográfica, livros, artigos e periódicos. Adotar-se-á como referenciais teóricos a teoria social do risco proposta pelo sociólogo alemão Ulrich Beck e a teoria da ética animalista defendida pelo filósofo australiano Peter Singer.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDISouza, Rafael Speck de2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/2010.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2015.v1i1.20Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 103 - 1212525-96952525-9695reponame:Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animaisinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20/pdfDireitos autorais 2016 Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animaishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-20T01:59:57Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/20Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbdaONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96952525-9695opendoar:2021-08-20T01:59:57Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests
Experimentação Animal na Sociedade de Risco e a Violação do Princípio da Igual Consideração de Interesses
title Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests
spellingShingle Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests
Souza, Rafael Speck de
Animal testing, Risk society, Animal rights, Animal ethics, Principle of equal consideration of like interests
Experimentação animal, Sociedade de risco, Direitos animais, Ética animal, Princípio da igual consideração de interesses
title_short Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests
title_full Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests
title_fullStr Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests
title_full_unstemmed Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests
title_sort Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests
author Souza, Rafael Speck de
author_facet Souza, Rafael Speck de
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Rafael Speck de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Animal testing, Risk society, Animal rights, Animal ethics, Principle of equal consideration of like interests
Experimentação animal, Sociedade de risco, Direitos animais, Ética animal, Princípio da igual consideração de interesses
topic Animal testing, Risk society, Animal rights, Animal ethics, Principle of equal consideration of like interests
Experimentação animal, Sociedade de risco, Direitos animais, Ética animal, Princípio da igual consideração de interesses
description This paper seeks to analyze the practice of animal testing under the paradigm of the Risk Society, Animal Rights, and in which point such research hurts the principle of equal consideration of like interests advocated by Peter Singer and other moral philosophers. On the one hand, this paper calls into question the attempt to transfer the results of an experiment with animals to reactions in humans, and the security criteria (or insecurity) adopted by science. On the other hand, an evaluation is made of how much these animal models are considered speciesist practice, which does not take into account the interests of non-human sentient species (which are capable of suffering). The historical, comparative and deductive methods have been used in order to reach the intended goals. The sources of research used are mostly bibliographical: books, papers and journals. Theoretical references adopted were the risk society theory proposed by German sociologist Ulrich Beck and the animal ethics theory advocated by the Australian philosopher Peter Singer.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2015.v1i1.20
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2015.v1i1.20
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 103 - 121
2525-9695
2525-9695
reponame:Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
collection Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1808858078502715392