Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20 |
Resumo: | This paper seeks to analyze the practice of animal testing under the paradigm of the Risk Society, Animal Rights, and in which point such research hurts the principle of equal consideration of like interests advocated by Peter Singer and other moral philosophers. On the one hand, this paper calls into question the attempt to transfer the results of an experiment with animals to reactions in humans, and the security criteria (or insecurity) adopted by science. On the other hand, an evaluation is made of how much these animal models are considered speciesist practice, which does not take into account the interests of non-human sentient species (which are capable of suffering). The historical, comparative and deductive methods have been used in order to reach the intended goals. The sources of research used are mostly bibliographical: books, papers and journals. Theoretical references adopted were the risk society theory proposed by German sociologist Ulrich Beck and the animal ethics theory advocated by the Australian philosopher Peter Singer. |
id |
CONPEDI-3_20f64d1e656577346845c19857564a62 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/20 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of InterestsExperimentação Animal na Sociedade de Risco e a Violação do Princípio da Igual Consideração de InteressesAnimal testing, Risk society, Animal rights, Animal ethics, Principle of equal consideration of like interestsExperimentação animal, Sociedade de risco, Direitos animais, Ética animal, Princípio da igual consideração de interessesThis paper seeks to analyze the practice of animal testing under the paradigm of the Risk Society, Animal Rights, and in which point such research hurts the principle of equal consideration of like interests advocated by Peter Singer and other moral philosophers. On the one hand, this paper calls into question the attempt to transfer the results of an experiment with animals to reactions in humans, and the security criteria (or insecurity) adopted by science. On the other hand, an evaluation is made of how much these animal models are considered speciesist practice, which does not take into account the interests of non-human sentient species (which are capable of suffering). The historical, comparative and deductive methods have been used in order to reach the intended goals. The sources of research used are mostly bibliographical: books, papers and journals. Theoretical references adopted were the risk society theory proposed by German sociologist Ulrich Beck and the animal ethics theory advocated by the Australian philosopher Peter Singer.O presente artigo busca analisar a prática da experimentação animal sob o paradigma da Sociedade de Risco, dos Direitos Animais, e em que ponto tais pesquisas ferem o princípio da igual consideração de interesses semelhantes, preconizado por Peter Singer e outros filósofos morais. Por um lado, coloca-se em questão o fato de se pretender transpor os resultados de um experimento com animais às reações com seres humanos, e os respectivos critérios de segurança (ou insegurança) adotados pela ciência. Por outro lado, avalia-se o quanto tais modelos animais são considerados uma prática especista, que não leva em consideração os interesses de espécies não humanas sencientes (que possuem a capacidade de sofrer). Para a obtenção dos objetivos colimados utilizar-se-á o método histórico, comparativo e dedutivo. Serão utilizados como fontes de pesquisa, eminentemente bibliográfica, livros, artigos e periódicos. Adotar-se-á como referenciais teóricos a teoria social do risco proposta pelo sociólogo alemão Ulrich Beck e a teoria da ética animalista defendida pelo filósofo australiano Peter Singer.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDISouza, Rafael Speck de2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/2010.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2015.v1i1.20Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 103 - 1212525-96952525-9695reponame:Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animaisinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20/pdfDireitos autorais 2016 Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animaishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-20T01:59:57Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/20Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbdaONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96952525-9695opendoar:2021-08-20T01:59:57Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests Experimentação Animal na Sociedade de Risco e a Violação do Princípio da Igual Consideração de Interesses |
title |
Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests |
spellingShingle |
Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests Souza, Rafael Speck de Animal testing, Risk society, Animal rights, Animal ethics, Principle of equal consideration of like interests Experimentação animal, Sociedade de risco, Direitos animais, Ética animal, Princípio da igual consideração de interesses |
title_short |
Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests |
title_full |
Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests |
title_fullStr |
Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests |
title_sort |
Animal Testing in the Risk Society and Violation of the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests |
author |
Souza, Rafael Speck de |
author_facet |
Souza, Rafael Speck de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Rafael Speck de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal testing, Risk society, Animal rights, Animal ethics, Principle of equal consideration of like interests Experimentação animal, Sociedade de risco, Direitos animais, Ética animal, Princípio da igual consideração de interesses |
topic |
Animal testing, Risk society, Animal rights, Animal ethics, Principle of equal consideration of like interests Experimentação animal, Sociedade de risco, Direitos animais, Ética animal, Princípio da igual consideração de interesses |
description |
This paper seeks to analyze the practice of animal testing under the paradigm of the Risk Society, Animal Rights, and in which point such research hurts the principle of equal consideration of like interests advocated by Peter Singer and other moral philosophers. On the one hand, this paper calls into question the attempt to transfer the results of an experiment with animals to reactions in humans, and the security criteria (or insecurity) adopted by science. On the other hand, an evaluation is made of how much these animal models are considered speciesist practice, which does not take into account the interests of non-human sentient species (which are capable of suffering). The historical, comparative and deductive methods have been used in order to reach the intended goals. The sources of research used are mostly bibliographical: books, papers and journals. Theoretical references adopted were the risk society theory proposed by German sociologist Ulrich Beck and the animal ethics theory advocated by the Australian philosopher Peter Singer. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2015.v1i1.20 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2015.v1i1.20 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/20/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 103 - 121 2525-9695 2525-9695 reponame:Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais |
collection |
Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1808858078502715392 |