Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Jairo Néia
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Beçak, Rubens
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Conpedi Law Review
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3665
Resumo: The criticisms toward judicial review from Richard Bellamy and Jeremy Waldron’s political constitutionalism approach demonstrate that they do not exclude constitutional courts entirely, as they accept mechanisms of legislative responses, except constitutional amendments. This paper concludes that the high number of constitutional amendments in Brazil does not mitigate judicial review critiques. The extensive structure of the Brazilian Constitution imposes frequent changes, which do not modify its essence. Furthermore, the possibility of judicial review over constitutional amendments represents that constitutional court could overrule legislative response.
id CONPEDI-4_09c9e281f0835aa697ea54b6b17c16a0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3665
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-4
network_name_str Conpedi Law Review
repository_id_str
spelling Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial ReviewEmenda Constitucional e Constitucionalismo Político: A Potencial Moderação das Críticas ao Controle Judicial de ConstitucionalidadeConstitutional CourtsLegislative responsesConstitutional interpretationInstitutional designJudicial supremacyCortes ConstitucionaisRespostas LegislativasInterpretação ConstitucionalDesenho InstitucionalSupremacia JudicialThe criticisms toward judicial review from Richard Bellamy and Jeremy Waldron’s political constitutionalism approach demonstrate that they do not exclude constitutional courts entirely, as they accept mechanisms of legislative responses, except constitutional amendments. This paper concludes that the high number of constitutional amendments in Brazil does not mitigate judicial review critiques. The extensive structure of the Brazilian Constitution imposes frequent changes, which do not modify its essence. Furthermore, the possibility of judicial review over constitutional amendments represents that constitutional court could overrule legislative response.A partir das críticas ao controle de constitucionalidade feitas pelo constitucionalismo político de Richard Bellamy e Jeremy Waldron, demonstra-se que eles não excluem absolutamente as cortes constitucionais, mas aceitam mecanismos de respostas legislativas, nas quais não se incluiriam as emendas constitucionais. Conclui-se que o alto número de emendas constitucionais no Brasil não mitiga as críticas ao controle de constitucionalidade, pois a estrutura analítica da Constituição Federal impõe mudanças constantes, que não alteram necessariamente a substância do Estado brasileiro. Ademais, a possibilidade de controle de constitucionalidade sobre emenda constitucional demonstra que o julgamento da corte pode se sobrepor à resposta legislativa.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/366510.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2016.v2i4.3665Conpedi Law Review; v. 2 n. 4 (2016): Instituciones y desarrollo en la hora actual de América Latina; 275-2962448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3665/3165Copyright (c) 2017 Jairo Néia Lima, Rubens Beçakinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Jairo NéiaBeçak, Rubens2021-08-20T02:09:24Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3665Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:09:24Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial Review
Emenda Constitucional e Constitucionalismo Político: A Potencial Moderação das Críticas ao Controle Judicial de Constitucionalidade
title Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial Review
spellingShingle Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial Review
Lima, Jairo Néia
Constitutional Courts
Legislative responses
Constitutional interpretation
Institutional design
Judicial supremacy
Cortes Constitucionais
Respostas Legislativas
Interpretação Constitucional
Desenho Institucional
Supremacia Judicial
title_short Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial Review
title_full Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial Review
title_fullStr Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial Review
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial Review
title_sort Constitutional Amendment and Political Constitutionalism: The Potential Mitigation of Critiques on Judicial Review
author Lima, Jairo Néia
author_facet Lima, Jairo Néia
Beçak, Rubens
author_role author
author2 Beçak, Rubens
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Jairo Néia
Beçak, Rubens
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Constitutional Courts
Legislative responses
Constitutional interpretation
Institutional design
Judicial supremacy
Cortes Constitucionais
Respostas Legislativas
Interpretação Constitucional
Desenho Institucional
Supremacia Judicial
topic Constitutional Courts
Legislative responses
Constitutional interpretation
Institutional design
Judicial supremacy
Cortes Constitucionais
Respostas Legislativas
Interpretação Constitucional
Desenho Institucional
Supremacia Judicial
description The criticisms toward judicial review from Richard Bellamy and Jeremy Waldron’s political constitutionalism approach demonstrate that they do not exclude constitutional courts entirely, as they accept mechanisms of legislative responses, except constitutional amendments. This paper concludes that the high number of constitutional amendments in Brazil does not mitigate judicial review critiques. The extensive structure of the Brazilian Constitution imposes frequent changes, which do not modify its essence. Furthermore, the possibility of judicial review over constitutional amendments represents that constitutional court could overrule legislative response.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3665
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2016.v2i4.3665
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3665
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2016.v2i4.3665
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3665/3165
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Jairo Néia Lima, Rubens Beçak
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Jairo Néia Lima, Rubens Beçak
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review; v. 2 n. 4 (2016): Instituciones y desarrollo en la hora actual de América Latina; 275-296
2448-3931
2448-3931
reponame:Conpedi Law Review
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Conpedi Law Review
collection Conpedi Law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1809730145780498432

Registros relacionados