Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and Deliberation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Becak, Rubens
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Conpedi Law Review
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3372
Resumo: Despite being a relatively recent phenomenon, democracy seems to have been raised to the level of a ubiquitous system so its existence and enshrinement are truly understood as a postulate. In this sense it’s very important to understand it’s evolution from the advent of the Modernity specially to understand how the model evolved adopting the representation by the political parties. Despite its qualities, the criticism about the model especially focused on the pretense lack of legitimacy, always persisted. This, in most cases, is done in order to improve its aim approaching the collective ideal. In this evolutionary bias is that we observe the construction of alternative models - we prefer to see as complementary to traditional representative by the parties - especially with the adoption of practices of direct democracy conducting to a system called semi- direct one. This is adopted by the current Brazilian Constitution with the prediction of the use of the figures of the plebiscite, referendum and popular initiative, does not seem to have exhausted the questioning and criticism. Rather these have been increased in recent decades flaring up in the nurture and coming to advocate the adoption of different experiences. These practices with mechanisms called participatory and deliberative, has the abili- ty to seek eventual democratic optimization.
id CONPEDI-4_f9916c39ee43095febc032fc63bb2ad4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3372
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-4
network_name_str Conpedi Law Review
repository_id_str
spelling Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and DeliberationDemocracia: Evolução e Aperfeiçoamento – O Papel da Participação e da DeliberaçãoDemocracyModern democracySemi-direct democracyParticipationDelibera- tivity.DemocraciaDemocracia modernaDemocracia semidiretaParticipaçãoDeliberação.Despite being a relatively recent phenomenon, democracy seems to have been raised to the level of a ubiquitous system so its existence and enshrinement are truly understood as a postulate. In this sense it’s very important to understand it’s evolution from the advent of the Modernity specially to understand how the model evolved adopting the representation by the political parties. Despite its qualities, the criticism about the model especially focused on the pretense lack of legitimacy, always persisted. This, in most cases, is done in order to improve its aim approaching the collective ideal. In this evolutionary bias is that we observe the construction of alternative models - we prefer to see as complementary to traditional representative by the parties - especially with the adoption of practices of direct democracy conducting to a system called semi- direct one. This is adopted by the current Brazilian Constitution with the prediction of the use of the figures of the plebiscite, referendum and popular initiative, does not seem to have exhausted the questioning and criticism. Rather these have been increased in recent decades flaring up in the nurture and coming to advocate the adoption of different experiences. These practices with mechanisms called participatory and deliberative, has the abili- ty to seek eventual democratic optimization.Apesar de constituir fenômeno relativamente recente, a democracia parece ter sido alçada ao patamar da onipresença, sendo que sua existência e entronização são verdadeiramente entendidas como postulado. Neste sentido, importantíssimo entendermos como se fez a sua evolução na perspectiva histórica moderna para, sobretudo, entendermos como o modelo veio a evolver, adotando a representação pelos partidos políticos. Apesar de suas pretensas qualidades, a crítica ao modelo, mormente centrada na eventual falta de legitimidade, sempre se apresentou. Esta, no mais das vezes, se fez no sentido de objetivar a sua melhora, aproximando-a de pretenso ideal coletivo. Neste viés evolutivo é que vamos observar a construção de modelos alternativos, que preferimos ver como complementares ao tradicional – representativo pelos partidos – mormente com a adoção de práticas de democracia direta, consignando sistema denominado semidireto. Esse, adotado pelo atual ordenamento constitucional brasileiro, com a previsão da utilização das figuras do plebiscito, referendum e iniciativa popular, não parece ter esgotado o questionamento e o criticismo. Ao contrário, esses vêm recrudescendo nas últimas décadas, espocando na doutrina e vindo a propugnar a adoção de experiências diferenciadas. Estas práticas, com mecanismos denominados participativos e deliberativos, têm o condão de procurar buscar eventual otimização democrática.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/337210.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i2.3372Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 2 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 114-1242448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3372/2889Copyright (c) 2016 Rubens Becakinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBecak, Rubens2021-08-20T02:10:17Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3372Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:10:17Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and Deliberation
Democracia: Evolução e Aperfeiçoamento – O Papel da Participação e da Deliberação
title Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and Deliberation
spellingShingle Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and Deliberation
Becak, Rubens
Democracy
Modern democracy
Semi-direct democracy
Participation
Delibera- tivity.
Democracia
Democracia moderna
Democracia semidireta
Participação
Deliberação.
title_short Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and Deliberation
title_full Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and Deliberation
title_fullStr Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and Deliberation
title_full_unstemmed Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and Deliberation
title_sort Democracy : Development and Improvement - The Role of Participation and Deliberation
author Becak, Rubens
author_facet Becak, Rubens
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Becak, Rubens
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy
Modern democracy
Semi-direct democracy
Participation
Delibera- tivity.
Democracia
Democracia moderna
Democracia semidireta
Participação
Deliberação.
topic Democracy
Modern democracy
Semi-direct democracy
Participation
Delibera- tivity.
Democracia
Democracia moderna
Democracia semidireta
Participação
Deliberação.
description Despite being a relatively recent phenomenon, democracy seems to have been raised to the level of a ubiquitous system so its existence and enshrinement are truly understood as a postulate. In this sense it’s very important to understand it’s evolution from the advent of the Modernity specially to understand how the model evolved adopting the representation by the political parties. Despite its qualities, the criticism about the model especially focused on the pretense lack of legitimacy, always persisted. This, in most cases, is done in order to improve its aim approaching the collective ideal. In this evolutionary bias is that we observe the construction of alternative models - we prefer to see as complementary to traditional representative by the parties - especially with the adoption of practices of direct democracy conducting to a system called semi- direct one. This is adopted by the current Brazilian Constitution with the prediction of the use of the figures of the plebiscite, referendum and popular initiative, does not seem to have exhausted the questioning and criticism. Rather these have been increased in recent decades flaring up in the nurture and coming to advocate the adoption of different experiences. These practices with mechanisms called participatory and deliberative, has the abili- ty to seek eventual democratic optimization.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3372
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i2.3372
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3372
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i2.3372
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3372/2889
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Rubens Becak
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Rubens Becak
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 2 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 114-124
2448-3931
2448-3931
reponame:Conpedi Law Review
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Conpedi Law Review
collection Conpedi Law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1809730144383795200