REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caldeira, Erika Machado
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Sass, Paola Estefan, Telles da Silva, Vicente, Fernandes, Nathalia Lima Freze, Mattos, Claudia Trindade, Elias, Carlos Nelson, Bolognese, Ana Maria, Nojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
Texto Completo: https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/165
Resumo: Introduction: Excess of adhesive around brackets negatively impact oral health of orthodontic patients. Objective: Evaluate the influence of orthodontic bonding system in removal of adhesive flash around orthodontic brackets. Methods: Based on their characteristics, four orthodontic bonding systems were selected: lightcuring adhesive (G1 - TransbondTM XT); pink pigmented light-curing adhesive (G2- TransbondTM Plus Color Change); resin-modified glass ionomer cement (G3 - FujiOrthoTM LC); and auto-curing adhesive (G4 - ConciseTM). For each group (n=10), a single operator placed metal brackets on bovine teeth (n=40) and used an explorer tip to visually remove flash excess. After curing / setting, the sampleswere taken to a stereomicroscope and the Axio Vision 4.4 software was used to measure the area of remnant adhesive flash around each bracket. The quantitative data obtained was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc test at = 0.05. Results: The results show that the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (G3) had a larger area of remnant material than the other groups. There was no statistical difference between the other groups (G1, G2, and G4), independently of pigmentation or curing technique. Conclusion: It was concluded that the use of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement results in a larger area of remnant flash excess, which can negatively impact oral health. Pigmentation and curing technique did not influence on remnant flash excess.
id CRO-1_286eaf5abf6c2105bbc8c29eece79e52
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs3.cro-rj.org.br:article/165
network_acronym_str CRO-1
network_name_str Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICSREMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICSDental bondingOrthodontic adhesivedental materialsColagem dentáriaadesivo ortodônticomateriais dentáriosIntroduction: Excess of adhesive around brackets negatively impact oral health of orthodontic patients. Objective: Evaluate the influence of orthodontic bonding system in removal of adhesive flash around orthodontic brackets. Methods: Based on their characteristics, four orthodontic bonding systems were selected: lightcuring adhesive (G1 - TransbondTM XT); pink pigmented light-curing adhesive (G2- TransbondTM Plus Color Change); resin-modified glass ionomer cement (G3 - FujiOrthoTM LC); and auto-curing adhesive (G4 - ConciseTM). For each group (n=10), a single operator placed metal brackets on bovine teeth (n=40) and used an explorer tip to visually remove flash excess. After curing / setting, the sampleswere taken to a stereomicroscope and the Axio Vision 4.4 software was used to measure the area of remnant adhesive flash around each bracket. The quantitative data obtained was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc test at = 0.05. Results: The results show that the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (G3) had a larger area of remnant material than the other groups. There was no statistical difference between the other groups (G1, G2, and G4), independently of pigmentation or curing technique. Conclusion: It was concluded that the use of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement results in a larger area of remnant flash excess, which can negatively impact oral health. Pigmentation and curing technique did not influence on remnant flash excess.Introdução: O excesso de material de colagem que permanece ao redor dos bráquetes impacta negativamente a saúde bucal dos pacientes ortodônticos. Objetivo: Avaliar a influência dos sistemas de colagem ortodônticos na remoção de excesso de adesivo ao redor de bráquetes. Métodos: Baseado em suas características, quatro sistemas de colagem ortodônticos foram selecionados: adesivo fotopolimerizável (G1 – TransbondTM XT); adesivo fotopolimerizável com pigmentação rosa (G2 - TransbondTM Plus Color Change); cimento de ionômero de vidro reforçado com resina (G3 - FujiOrthoTM LC); e adesivo autopolimerizável (G4 - ConciseTM). Para cada grupo (n=10), um único operador posicionou os bráquetes em dentes bovinos (n=40) e utilizou uma sonda exploradora para remoção visual do excesso de material de colagem. Após a polimerização / tempo de cura, as amostras foram levadas ao estereomicroscópio e o software Axio Vision 4,4 foi utilizado para mensurar a área de excesso de adesivo remanescente ao redor de cada bráquete. Os dados quantitativos obtidos foram analisados pelos testes de Kruskal-Wallis e post-hoc de Dunn em significância de = 0,05. Resultados: O cimento de ionômero de vidro reforçado por resina (G3) apresentou a maior área de remanescente de excesso. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os demais grupos (G1, G2 e G4), independente da pigmentação ou do método de polimerização. Conclusão: O uso de cimento de ionômero de vidro reforçado por resina resulta em maior área de excesso remanescente, o que pode impactar negativamente a saúde bucal. A pigmentação e o método de polimerização não influenciaram no excesso de material remanescente.Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal2021-05-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/16510.29327/24816.5.2-4Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); Vol. 5 No. 2: May-August 2020; 36-42Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); v. 5 n. 2: May-August 2020; 36-422595-47331518-524910.29327/24816.5.2reponame:Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)instname:Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)instacron:CROporhttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/165/105Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaldeira, Erika MachadoSass, Paola EstefanTelles da Silva, VicenteFernandes, Nathalia Lima FrezeMattos, Claudia TrindadeElias, Carlos NelsonBolognese, Ana MariaNojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves2021-11-30T18:22:18Zoai:ojs3.cro-rj.org.br:article/165Revistahttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revistahttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/oairevista.cientifica@cro-rj.org.br || rorefa@terra.com.br2595-47331518-5249opendoar:2021-11-30T18:22:18Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) - Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS
REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS
title REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS
spellingShingle REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS
Caldeira, Erika Machado
Dental bonding
Orthodontic adhesive
dental materials
Colagem dentária
adesivo ortodôntico
materiais dentários
title_short REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS
title_full REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS
title_fullStr REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS
title_full_unstemmed REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS
title_sort REMNANT ADHESIVE FLASH IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS
author Caldeira, Erika Machado
author_facet Caldeira, Erika Machado
Sass, Paola Estefan
Telles da Silva, Vicente
Fernandes, Nathalia Lima Freze
Mattos, Claudia Trindade
Elias, Carlos Nelson
Bolognese, Ana Maria
Nojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves
author_role author
author2 Sass, Paola Estefan
Telles da Silva, Vicente
Fernandes, Nathalia Lima Freze
Mattos, Claudia Trindade
Elias, Carlos Nelson
Bolognese, Ana Maria
Nojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caldeira, Erika Machado
Sass, Paola Estefan
Telles da Silva, Vicente
Fernandes, Nathalia Lima Freze
Mattos, Claudia Trindade
Elias, Carlos Nelson
Bolognese, Ana Maria
Nojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental bonding
Orthodontic adhesive
dental materials
Colagem dentária
adesivo ortodôntico
materiais dentários
topic Dental bonding
Orthodontic adhesive
dental materials
Colagem dentária
adesivo ortodôntico
materiais dentários
description Introduction: Excess of adhesive around brackets negatively impact oral health of orthodontic patients. Objective: Evaluate the influence of orthodontic bonding system in removal of adhesive flash around orthodontic brackets. Methods: Based on their characteristics, four orthodontic bonding systems were selected: lightcuring adhesive (G1 - TransbondTM XT); pink pigmented light-curing adhesive (G2- TransbondTM Plus Color Change); resin-modified glass ionomer cement (G3 - FujiOrthoTM LC); and auto-curing adhesive (G4 - ConciseTM). For each group (n=10), a single operator placed metal brackets on bovine teeth (n=40) and used an explorer tip to visually remove flash excess. After curing / setting, the sampleswere taken to a stereomicroscope and the Axio Vision 4.4 software was used to measure the area of remnant adhesive flash around each bracket. The quantitative data obtained was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc test at = 0.05. Results: The results show that the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (G3) had a larger area of remnant material than the other groups. There was no statistical difference between the other groups (G1, G2, and G4), independently of pigmentation or curing technique. Conclusion: It was concluded that the use of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement results in a larger area of remnant flash excess, which can negatively impact oral health. Pigmentation and curing technique did not influence on remnant flash excess.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/165
10.29327/24816.5.2-4
url https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/165
identifier_str_mv 10.29327/24816.5.2-4
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/165/105
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); Vol. 5 No. 2: May-August 2020; 36-42
Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); v. 5 n. 2: May-August 2020; 36-42
2595-4733
1518-5249
10.29327/24816.5.2
reponame:Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
instname:Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)
instacron:CRO
instname_str Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)
instacron_str CRO
institution CRO
reponame_str Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
collection Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) - Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.cientifica@cro-rj.org.br || rorefa@terra.com.br
_version_ 1797042306315976704