Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The discovery of titanium osseointegrated implants enabled the development of screw or cement-retained dental prostheses. However, each retention method involves different aspects. Objective: this study aims at reviewing the literature of in vitro and in vivo studies of the last 7 years on the mechanical, biological, aesthetic and occlusal properties and the cost of screw and cementretained prostheses to identify what can promote greater longevity and economy by considering the patient’s clinical framework. Data sources: Our method was based on the collection of scientific articles published in English from 2012 to 2018 in the PubMed database. Summary of the findings: we noted that in some clinical cases, a retention method was more appropriate than the other, as seen in the access to the posterior region or the palatal face of the crowns, the position/angulation of implants in the anterior region, the patient’s health and economic conditions. Both protheses can suffer or not from mechanical and biological complications. Reversibility can also be associated to cement-retained protheses. There are alternatives to screwed prosthetics to achieve satisfactory aesthetics in the anterior region despite being more expensive. Ideal occlusion tends to be more easily achieved by cemented prosthesis as it avoids prosthetics screws and the formation of crown holes, despite the contributions of correct planning followed by the analysis of static and in motion occlusions. Conclusion: each retention method has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore,the best method is the one that best fits the characteristics and needs of each patient. |
id |
CRO-1_fe26ac8a54d72fb88db94239b6e580c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs3.cro-rj.org.br:article/42 |
network_acronym_str |
CRO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literatureProsthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literatureDental implantsDental ProsthesisProsthesis retentionIntroduction: The discovery of titanium osseointegrated implants enabled the development of screw or cement-retained dental prostheses. However, each retention method involves different aspects. Objective: this study aims at reviewing the literature of in vitro and in vivo studies of the last 7 years on the mechanical, biological, aesthetic and occlusal properties and the cost of screw and cementretained prostheses to identify what can promote greater longevity and economy by considering the patient’s clinical framework. Data sources: Our method was based on the collection of scientific articles published in English from 2012 to 2018 in the PubMed database. Summary of the findings: we noted that in some clinical cases, a retention method was more appropriate than the other, as seen in the access to the posterior region or the palatal face of the crowns, the position/angulation of implants in the anterior region, the patient’s health and economic conditions. Both protheses can suffer or not from mechanical and biological complications. Reversibility can also be associated to cement-retained protheses. There are alternatives to screwed prosthetics to achieve satisfactory aesthetics in the anterior region despite being more expensive. Ideal occlusion tends to be more easily achieved by cemented prosthesis as it avoids prosthetics screws and the formation of crown holes, despite the contributions of correct planning followed by the analysis of static and in motion occlusions. Conclusion: each retention method has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore,the best method is the one that best fits the characteristics and needs of each patient.Introdução: A descoberta de implantes osteointegrados de titânio possibilitou o desenvolvimento de próteses dentárias parafusadas ou cimentadas. No entanto, cada método de retenção envolve diferentes aspectos. Objetivo: este estudo tem como objetivo revisar a literatura de estudos in vitro e in vivo dos últimos 7 anos sobre as propriedades mecânicas, biológicas, estéticas e oclusais e o custo de próteses parafusadas e cimentadas para identificar o que pode promover maior longevidade e economia, considerando o quadro clínico do paciente. Fontes de dados: Nosso método foi baseado na coleção de artigos científicos publicados em inglês de 2012 a 2018 no banco de dados PubMed. Síntese dos achados: notamos que em alguns casos clínicos, um método de retenção foi mais adequado que o outro, como visto no acesso à região posterior ou na face palatina das coroas, a posição / angulação dos implantes na região anterior, saúde do paciente e condições econômicas. Ambas as próteses podem sofrer ou não de complicações mecânicas e biológicas. A reversibilidade também pode ser associada a próteses cimentadas. Existem alternativas às próteses parafusadas para alcançar uma estética satisfatória na região anterior, apesar de serem mais caras. A oclusão ideal tende a ser mais facilmente alcançada por próteses cimentadas, pois evita parafusos protéticos e a formação de orifícios coronários, apesar das contribuições do planejamento correto, seguido pela análise de oclusões estáticas e em movimento. Conclusão: cada método de retenção tem suas vantagens e desvantagens. Portanto, o melhor método é aquele que melhor se adapta às características e necessidades de cada paciente.Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal2018-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); Vol. 3 No. 2: May-August 2018; 2-7Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); v. 3 n. 2: May-August 2018; 2-72595-47331518-5249reponame:Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)instname:Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)instacron:CROporhttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42/19Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRelvas, Adriano Barreira de OliveiraFellows, Viviane Cristine Ferreira LahmeyerSotelo, PabloAzevedo, Marcos Venício Rocha deLefrançois, MauroSotelo, Laura2018-09-11T05:48:34Zoai:ojs3.cro-rj.org.br:article/42Revistahttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revistahttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/oairevista.cientifica@cro-rj.org.br || rorefa@terra.com.br2595-47331518-5249opendoar:2018-09-11T05:48:34Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) - Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature |
title |
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature |
spellingShingle |
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature Relvas, Adriano Barreira de Oliveira Dental implants Dental Prosthesis Prosthesis retention |
title_short |
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature |
title_full |
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature |
title_fullStr |
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature |
title_sort |
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature |
author |
Relvas, Adriano Barreira de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Relvas, Adriano Barreira de Oliveira Fellows, Viviane Cristine Ferreira Lahmeyer Sotelo, Pablo Azevedo, Marcos Venício Rocha de Lefrançois, Mauro Sotelo, Laura |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fellows, Viviane Cristine Ferreira Lahmeyer Sotelo, Pablo Azevedo, Marcos Venício Rocha de Lefrançois, Mauro Sotelo, Laura |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Relvas, Adriano Barreira de Oliveira Fellows, Viviane Cristine Ferreira Lahmeyer Sotelo, Pablo Azevedo, Marcos Venício Rocha de Lefrançois, Mauro Sotelo, Laura |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental implants Dental Prosthesis Prosthesis retention |
topic |
Dental implants Dental Prosthesis Prosthesis retention |
description |
Introduction: The discovery of titanium osseointegrated implants enabled the development of screw or cement-retained dental prostheses. However, each retention method involves different aspects. Objective: this study aims at reviewing the literature of in vitro and in vivo studies of the last 7 years on the mechanical, biological, aesthetic and occlusal properties and the cost of screw and cementretained prostheses to identify what can promote greater longevity and economy by considering the patient’s clinical framework. Data sources: Our method was based on the collection of scientific articles published in English from 2012 to 2018 in the PubMed database. Summary of the findings: we noted that in some clinical cases, a retention method was more appropriate than the other, as seen in the access to the posterior region or the palatal face of the crowns, the position/angulation of implants in the anterior region, the patient’s health and economic conditions. Both protheses can suffer or not from mechanical and biological complications. Reversibility can also be associated to cement-retained protheses. There are alternatives to screwed prosthetics to achieve satisfactory aesthetics in the anterior region despite being more expensive. Ideal occlusion tends to be more easily achieved by cemented prosthesis as it avoids prosthetics screws and the formation of crown holes, despite the contributions of correct planning followed by the analysis of static and in motion occlusions. Conclusion: each retention method has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore,the best method is the one that best fits the characteristics and needs of each patient. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42 |
url |
https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42/19 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); Vol. 3 No. 2: May-August 2018; 2-7 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); v. 3 n. 2: May-August 2018; 2-7 2595-4733 1518-5249 reponame:Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) instname:Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ) instacron:CRO |
instname_str |
Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ) |
instacron_str |
CRO |
institution |
CRO |
reponame_str |
Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) |
collection |
Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) - Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.cientifica@cro-rj.org.br || rorefa@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1797042305676345344 |