Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Relvas, Adriano Barreira de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Fellows, Viviane Cristine Ferreira Lahmeyer, Sotelo, Pablo, Azevedo, Marcos Venício Rocha de, Lefrançois, Mauro, Sotelo, Laura
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
Texto Completo: https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42
Resumo: Introduction: The discovery of titanium osseointegrated implants enabled the development of screw or cement-retained dental prostheses. However, each retention method involves different aspects. Objective: this study aims at reviewing the literature of in vitro and in vivo studies of the last 7 years on the mechanical, biological, aesthetic and occlusal properties and the cost of screw and cementretained prostheses to identify what can promote greater longevity and economy by considering the patient’s clinical framework. Data sources: Our method was based on the collection of scientific articles published in English from 2012 to 2018 in the PubMed database. Summary of the findings: we noted that in some clinical cases, a retention method was more appropriate than the other, as seen in the access to the posterior region or the palatal face of the crowns, the position/angulation of implants in the anterior region, the patient’s health and economic conditions. Both protheses can suffer or not from mechanical and biological complications. Reversibility can also be associated to cement-retained protheses. There are alternatives to screwed prosthetics to achieve satisfactory aesthetics in the anterior region despite being more expensive. Ideal occlusion tends to be more easily achieved by cemented prosthesis as it avoids prosthetics screws and the formation of crown holes, despite the contributions of correct planning followed by the analysis of static and in motion occlusions. Conclusion: each retention method has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore,the best method is the one that best fits the characteristics and needs of each patient.
id CRO-1_fe26ac8a54d72fb88db94239b6e580c1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs3.cro-rj.org.br:article/42
network_acronym_str CRO-1
network_name_str Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literatureProsthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literatureDental implantsDental ProsthesisProsthesis retentionIntroduction: The discovery of titanium osseointegrated implants enabled the development of screw or cement-retained dental prostheses. However, each retention method involves different aspects. Objective: this study aims at reviewing the literature of in vitro and in vivo studies of the last 7 years on the mechanical, biological, aesthetic and occlusal properties and the cost of screw and cementretained prostheses to identify what can promote greater longevity and economy by considering the patient’s clinical framework. Data sources: Our method was based on the collection of scientific articles published in English from 2012 to 2018 in the PubMed database. Summary of the findings: we noted that in some clinical cases, a retention method was more appropriate than the other, as seen in the access to the posterior region or the palatal face of the crowns, the position/angulation of implants in the anterior region, the patient’s health and economic conditions. Both protheses can suffer or not from mechanical and biological complications. Reversibility can also be associated to cement-retained protheses. There are alternatives to screwed prosthetics to achieve satisfactory aesthetics in the anterior region despite being more expensive. Ideal occlusion tends to be more easily achieved by cemented prosthesis as it avoids prosthetics screws and the formation of crown holes, despite the contributions of correct planning followed by the analysis of static and in motion occlusions. Conclusion: each retention method has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore,the best method is the one that best fits the characteristics and needs of each patient.Introdução: A descoberta de implantes osteointegrados de titânio possibilitou o desenvolvimento de próteses dentárias parafusadas ou cimentadas. No entanto, cada método de retenção envolve diferentes aspectos. Objetivo: este estudo tem como objetivo revisar a literatura de estudos in vitro e in vivo dos últimos 7 anos sobre as propriedades mecânicas, biológicas, estéticas e oclusais e o custo de próteses parafusadas e cimentadas para identificar o que pode promover maior longevidade e economia, considerando o quadro clínico do paciente. Fontes de dados: Nosso método foi baseado na coleção de artigos científicos publicados em inglês de 2012 a 2018 no banco de dados PubMed. Síntese dos achados: notamos que em alguns casos clínicos, um método de retenção foi mais adequado que o outro, como visto no acesso à região posterior ou na face palatina das coroas, a posição / angulação dos implantes na região anterior, saúde do paciente e condições econômicas. Ambas as próteses podem sofrer ou não de complicações mecânicas e biológicas. A reversibilidade também pode ser associada a próteses cimentadas. Existem alternativas às próteses parafusadas para alcançar uma estética satisfatória na região anterior, apesar de serem mais caras. A oclusão ideal tende a ser mais facilmente alcançada por próteses cimentadas, pois evita parafusos protéticos e a formação de orifícios coronários, apesar das contribuições do planejamento correto, seguido pela análise de oclusões estáticas e em movimento. Conclusão: cada método de retenção tem suas vantagens e desvantagens. Portanto, o melhor método é aquele que melhor se adapta às características e necessidades de cada paciente.Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal2018-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); Vol. 3 No. 2: May-August 2018; 2-7Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); v. 3 n. 2: May-August 2018; 2-72595-47331518-5249reponame:Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)instname:Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)instacron:CROporhttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42/19Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRelvas, Adriano Barreira de OliveiraFellows, Viviane Cristine Ferreira LahmeyerSotelo, PabloAzevedo, Marcos Venício Rocha deLefrançois, MauroSotelo, Laura2018-09-11T05:48:34Zoai:ojs3.cro-rj.org.br:article/42Revistahttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revistahttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/oairevista.cientifica@cro-rj.org.br || rorefa@terra.com.br2595-47331518-5249opendoar:2018-09-11T05:48:34Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) - Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
title Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
spellingShingle Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
Relvas, Adriano Barreira de Oliveira
Dental implants
Dental Prosthesis
Prosthesis retention
title_short Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
title_full Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
title_fullStr Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
title_sort Prosthetics on implants: cement or screw-retained? A review of the literature: A review of the literature
author Relvas, Adriano Barreira de Oliveira
author_facet Relvas, Adriano Barreira de Oliveira
Fellows, Viviane Cristine Ferreira Lahmeyer
Sotelo, Pablo
Azevedo, Marcos Venício Rocha de
Lefrançois, Mauro
Sotelo, Laura
author_role author
author2 Fellows, Viviane Cristine Ferreira Lahmeyer
Sotelo, Pablo
Azevedo, Marcos Venício Rocha de
Lefrançois, Mauro
Sotelo, Laura
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Relvas, Adriano Barreira de Oliveira
Fellows, Viviane Cristine Ferreira Lahmeyer
Sotelo, Pablo
Azevedo, Marcos Venício Rocha de
Lefrançois, Mauro
Sotelo, Laura
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental implants
Dental Prosthesis
Prosthesis retention
topic Dental implants
Dental Prosthesis
Prosthesis retention
description Introduction: The discovery of titanium osseointegrated implants enabled the development of screw or cement-retained dental prostheses. However, each retention method involves different aspects. Objective: this study aims at reviewing the literature of in vitro and in vivo studies of the last 7 years on the mechanical, biological, aesthetic and occlusal properties and the cost of screw and cementretained prostheses to identify what can promote greater longevity and economy by considering the patient’s clinical framework. Data sources: Our method was based on the collection of scientific articles published in English from 2012 to 2018 in the PubMed database. Summary of the findings: we noted that in some clinical cases, a retention method was more appropriate than the other, as seen in the access to the posterior region or the palatal face of the crowns, the position/angulation of implants in the anterior region, the patient’s health and economic conditions. Both protheses can suffer or not from mechanical and biological complications. Reversibility can also be associated to cement-retained protheses. There are alternatives to screwed prosthetics to achieve satisfactory aesthetics in the anterior region despite being more expensive. Ideal occlusion tends to be more easily achieved by cemented prosthesis as it avoids prosthetics screws and the formation of crown holes, despite the contributions of correct planning followed by the analysis of static and in motion occlusions. Conclusion: each retention method has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore,the best method is the one that best fits the characteristics and needs of each patient.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42
url https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/42/19
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); Vol. 3 No. 2: May-August 2018; 2-7
Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); v. 3 n. 2: May-August 2018; 2-7
2595-4733
1518-5249
reponame:Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
instname:Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)
instacron:CRO
instname_str Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)
instacron_str CRO
institution CRO
reponame_str Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
collection Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) - Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.cientifica@cro-rj.org.br || rorefa@terra.com.br
_version_ 1797042305676345344