Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemática
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/3831 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Neonatal death is still a growing contribution to overall infant mortality in children under 5 years of age, representing about 73% of postnatal deaths in the world. Septic shock is among the main etiologies in this age group. Early identification of the condition and its pathophysiology are determining factors for proper management. In this context, there are two drug therapies for shock reversal: dopamine (the most used vasopressor) and epinephrine (inotropic and vasopressor). Method: This is a systematic review using the PRISMA method. The keywords used were: preterm; hypotension; vasoactive medications; neonatal shock; epinephrine and dopamine, in the Lilacs, PubMed and SciELO databases, for a period of 10 years, based on the research question PICO: ´´in a neonatal population, what is the best drug to treat shock? ``. After, was performed an exclusion of duplicates and publications that did not meet the inclusion criteria – cohort studies, case-control, randomized clinical trials or double-blind clinical trials comparing the use of epinephrine and dopamine in neonatal shock in preterm infants. Of these, the variables analyzed were: gestational age, birth weight, dose of epinephrine, dose of dopamine, time of use of both drugs, systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 0 and 45 minutes and outcome. Results: From the combinations of keywords, 2,485 articles were found. After filtering, only 1 article met the eligibility criteria. In this study, 40 neonates with gestational age between 30 and 32 weeks and birth weight between 1100g and 1200g with septic shock refractory to fluid replacement were randomized to receive epinephrine or dopamine. After 45 minutes, 5 neonates in the epinephrine group and 6 in the dopamine group achieved shock reversal. 10 and 6 neonates in the respective groups achieved hemodynamic stability (>120min without an increase in vasoactive drug). Mean blood pressure ranged between 32 ± 15 in the epinephrine group and 32 ± 12 in the dopamine group. The main outcomes were: intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Mortality reached 70% in the epinephrine group and 80% in the dopamine group. Conclusion: Both epinephrine and dopamine demonstrated similar safety and efficacy on blood pressure, however, epinephrine had transient effects on lactate metabolism. For this reason and due to the greater number of studies involving dopamine, the literature indicates this drug as the first line of treatment for neonatal shock. |
id |
CUB_038a9acd96333611ae20353335106081 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br:123456789/3831 |
network_acronym_str |
CUB |
network_name_str |
Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemáticaEpinefrinaDopaminaChoque neonatalDroga vasoativaPrematuroCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINAIntroduction: Neonatal death is still a growing contribution to overall infant mortality in children under 5 years of age, representing about 73% of postnatal deaths in the world. Septic shock is among the main etiologies in this age group. Early identification of the condition and its pathophysiology are determining factors for proper management. In this context, there are two drug therapies for shock reversal: dopamine (the most used vasopressor) and epinephrine (inotropic and vasopressor). Method: This is a systematic review using the PRISMA method. The keywords used were: preterm; hypotension; vasoactive medications; neonatal shock; epinephrine and dopamine, in the Lilacs, PubMed and SciELO databases, for a period of 10 years, based on the research question PICO: ´´in a neonatal population, what is the best drug to treat shock? ``. After, was performed an exclusion of duplicates and publications that did not meet the inclusion criteria – cohort studies, case-control, randomized clinical trials or double-blind clinical trials comparing the use of epinephrine and dopamine in neonatal shock in preterm infants. Of these, the variables analyzed were: gestational age, birth weight, dose of epinephrine, dose of dopamine, time of use of both drugs, systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 0 and 45 minutes and outcome. Results: From the combinations of keywords, 2,485 articles were found. After filtering, only 1 article met the eligibility criteria. In this study, 40 neonates with gestational age between 30 and 32 weeks and birth weight between 1100g and 1200g with septic shock refractory to fluid replacement were randomized to receive epinephrine or dopamine. After 45 minutes, 5 neonates in the epinephrine group and 6 in the dopamine group achieved shock reversal. 10 and 6 neonates in the respective groups achieved hemodynamic stability (>120min without an increase in vasoactive drug). Mean blood pressure ranged between 32 ± 15 in the epinephrine group and 32 ± 12 in the dopamine group. The main outcomes were: intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Mortality reached 70% in the epinephrine group and 80% in the dopamine group. Conclusion: Both epinephrine and dopamine demonstrated similar safety and efficacy on blood pressure, however, epinephrine had transient effects on lactate metabolism. For this reason and due to the greater number of studies involving dopamine, the literature indicates this drug as the first line of treatment for neonatal shock.Introdução: A morte neonatal ainda é uma crescente colaboração para a mortalidade geral infantil em menores de 5 anos, representando cerca de 73% das mortes pós-natais no mundo. O choque séptico está entre as principais etiologias nesta faixa etária. A identificação precoce do quadro e sua fisiopatologia são fatores determinantes para seu manejo adequado. Nesse contexto, surgem duas terapias medicamentosas para reversão do choque: a dopamina (vasopressor mais utilizado) e a epinefrina (inotrópico e vasopressor). Método: Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática, utilizando o método PRISMA. Foram utilizadas as palavras-chave: premature; preterm; hypotension; vasoactive medications; neonatal shock; epinephrine e dopamine, nas bases de dados Lilacs, PubMed e SciELO, pelo período de 10 anos, a partir da pergunta de pesquisa PICO: ´´em uma população neonatal, qual a melhor droga para tratamento do choque?``. Após, foi realizada a exclusão dos duplicados e das publicações que não preencheram os critérios de inclusão – estudos de coorte, caso controle, estudos clínicos randomizados ou clínicos duplo-cego que comparam o uso de epinefrina e dopamina no choque neonatal em prematuros. Deste, as variáveis analisadas foram: idade gestacional, peso ao nascer, dose de epinefrina, dose de dopamina, tempo de uso de ambas as drogas, pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) em 0 e 45 minutos e desfecho. Resultados: A partir das combinações de palavras-chave, foram encontrados 2.485 artigos. Após a filtragem, apenas 1 artigo preenchia os critérios de elegibilidade. Neste estudo, 40 neonatos com idade gestacional entre 30 e 32 semanas e peso ao nascer entre 1100g e 1200g com choque séptico refratário a reposição volêmica foram randomizados para receberem epinefrina ou dopamina. Após 45 minutos, 5 neonatos do grupo epinefrina e 6 do grupo dopamina atingiram reversão do choque. 10 e 6 neonatos dos respectivos grupos atingiram estabilidade hemodinâmica (>120min sem aumento de droga vasoativa). A pressão arterial média variou entre 32 ± 15 no grupo epinefrina e 32 ± 12 no grupo dopamina. Os principais desfechos foram: hemorragia intraventricular, enterocolite necrotizante, retinopatia da prematuridade e displasia broncopulmonar. A mortalidade chegou a 70% no grupo epinefrina e 80% no grupo dopamina. Conclusão: Tanto epinefrina quanto dopamina demonstraram segurança e eficácia similares sobre a pressão arterial, porém, a epinefrina cursou com efeitos transitórios no metabolismo do lactato. Por essa razão e pela maior quantidade de estudos envolvendo a dopamina, a literatura aponta esta droga como primeira linha de tratamento para o choque neonatal.Universidade PositivoBrasilMedicinaUPOkamoto, Cristina Terumyhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3886452672034570Pozza , Ariadne CristineCorti, Eduarda Luísa RochaTeixeira, Heloísa MoroCordeiro, Maria Victória GutierrezSilveira, Mariane Barbieri da2022-05-31T18:17:24Z20212022-05-31T18:17:24Z2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/3831porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubasinstname:Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)instacron:CUB2022-05-31T18:22:42Zoai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br:123456789/3831Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.brazcubas.edu.br/oai/requestbibli@brazcubas.edu.bropendoar:2022-05-31T18:22:42Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas - Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemática |
spellingShingle |
Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemática Pozza , Ariadne Cristine Epinefrina Dopamina Choque neonatal Droga vasoativa Prematuro CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA |
title_short |
Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemática |
title_full |
Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemática |
title_fullStr |
Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemática |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemática |
title_sort |
Epinefrina ou Dopamina: qual a melhor droga vasoativa no choque séptico neonatal? – uma revisão sistemática |
author |
Pozza , Ariadne Cristine |
author_facet |
Pozza , Ariadne Cristine Corti, Eduarda Luísa Rocha Teixeira, Heloísa Moro Cordeiro, Maria Victória Gutierrez Silveira, Mariane Barbieri da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Corti, Eduarda Luísa Rocha Teixeira, Heloísa Moro Cordeiro, Maria Victória Gutierrez Silveira, Mariane Barbieri da |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Okamoto, Cristina Terumy http://lattes.cnpq.br/3886452672034570 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pozza , Ariadne Cristine Corti, Eduarda Luísa Rocha Teixeira, Heloísa Moro Cordeiro, Maria Victória Gutierrez Silveira, Mariane Barbieri da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Epinefrina Dopamina Choque neonatal Droga vasoativa Prematuro CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA |
topic |
Epinefrina Dopamina Choque neonatal Droga vasoativa Prematuro CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA |
description |
Introduction: Neonatal death is still a growing contribution to overall infant mortality in children under 5 years of age, representing about 73% of postnatal deaths in the world. Septic shock is among the main etiologies in this age group. Early identification of the condition and its pathophysiology are determining factors for proper management. In this context, there are two drug therapies for shock reversal: dopamine (the most used vasopressor) and epinephrine (inotropic and vasopressor). Method: This is a systematic review using the PRISMA method. The keywords used were: preterm; hypotension; vasoactive medications; neonatal shock; epinephrine and dopamine, in the Lilacs, PubMed and SciELO databases, for a period of 10 years, based on the research question PICO: ´´in a neonatal population, what is the best drug to treat shock? ``. After, was performed an exclusion of duplicates and publications that did not meet the inclusion criteria – cohort studies, case-control, randomized clinical trials or double-blind clinical trials comparing the use of epinephrine and dopamine in neonatal shock in preterm infants. Of these, the variables analyzed were: gestational age, birth weight, dose of epinephrine, dose of dopamine, time of use of both drugs, systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 0 and 45 minutes and outcome. Results: From the combinations of keywords, 2,485 articles were found. After filtering, only 1 article met the eligibility criteria. In this study, 40 neonates with gestational age between 30 and 32 weeks and birth weight between 1100g and 1200g with septic shock refractory to fluid replacement were randomized to receive epinephrine or dopamine. After 45 minutes, 5 neonates in the epinephrine group and 6 in the dopamine group achieved shock reversal. 10 and 6 neonates in the respective groups achieved hemodynamic stability (>120min without an increase in vasoactive drug). Mean blood pressure ranged between 32 ± 15 in the epinephrine group and 32 ± 12 in the dopamine group. The main outcomes were: intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Mortality reached 70% in the epinephrine group and 80% in the dopamine group. Conclusion: Both epinephrine and dopamine demonstrated similar safety and efficacy on blood pressure, however, epinephrine had transient effects on lactate metabolism. For this reason and due to the greater number of studies involving dopamine, the literature indicates this drug as the first line of treatment for neonatal shock. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 2021 2022-05-31T18:17:24Z 2022-05-31T18:17:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/3831 |
url |
https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/3831 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Positivo Brasil Medicina UP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Positivo Brasil Medicina UP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas instname:Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB) instacron:CUB |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB) |
instacron_str |
CUB |
institution |
CUB |
reponame_str |
Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas |
collection |
Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas - Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibli@brazcubas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798311346237865984 |