Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Ludmila Costa Toni de
Data de Publicação: 2008
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/1181
Resumo: Introduction: The hemiparesis occurring after a stroke generates walking disorders and functional deficits. The purpose of this study was to verify the influence of an uneven surface (medium-density foam) on the gait cycle of hemiparetic patients. Method: This exploratory, transversal study included 33 subjects: 18 stroke patients (6 months post-stroke onset or more) and 15 healthy individuals (control group) matched by age and gender. Subjects were able to ambulate without walking-aid for a 5-m minimum distance. A 2D kinematics gait analysis was performed comparing gait cycles in the two surfaces (regular and foam). Five different angles were quantified: shoulder segment and pelvic segment (frontal plane), and hip, knee and ankle angles (sagittal plane). Gait velocity and stride length were also calculated. Data was compared using variance and co-variance analyses having gait velocity as co-variable (post-hoc tests were performed when necessary). An alpha level of 0.05 was chosen for significance. Results: There were significant differences between groups and surfaces in all measured parameters but the pelvic angle, which was similar in all cases. Patients presented smaller angle excursions as compared in to healthy subjects, excepting the shoulder segment, which showed greater excursion. Both groups increased their excursions on the uneven surface. The velocity adjustment removed the difference between groups for hip and shoulder angles. Conclusion: Even though hemiparetic patients revealed smaller joint excursions in the sagittal plane they showed a similar change on the gait standard as compared to healthy individuals, which was demonstrated with an increase in joint excursion but lower movement range when comparing the 2 surfaces.
id CUB_f2a503a4e7d9aa710d6370e36375be55
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br:123456789/1181
network_acronym_str CUB
network_name_str Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
repository_id_str
spelling Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidadeMarchaAcidente vascular encefálicoBiomecânicaAmbienteFISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONALIntroduction: The hemiparesis occurring after a stroke generates walking disorders and functional deficits. The purpose of this study was to verify the influence of an uneven surface (medium-density foam) on the gait cycle of hemiparetic patients. Method: This exploratory, transversal study included 33 subjects: 18 stroke patients (6 months post-stroke onset or more) and 15 healthy individuals (control group) matched by age and gender. Subjects were able to ambulate without walking-aid for a 5-m minimum distance. A 2D kinematics gait analysis was performed comparing gait cycles in the two surfaces (regular and foam). Five different angles were quantified: shoulder segment and pelvic segment (frontal plane), and hip, knee and ankle angles (sagittal plane). Gait velocity and stride length were also calculated. Data was compared using variance and co-variance analyses having gait velocity as co-variable (post-hoc tests were performed when necessary). An alpha level of 0.05 was chosen for significance. Results: There were significant differences between groups and surfaces in all measured parameters but the pelvic angle, which was similar in all cases. Patients presented smaller angle excursions as compared in to healthy subjects, excepting the shoulder segment, which showed greater excursion. Both groups increased their excursions on the uneven surface. The velocity adjustment removed the difference between groups for hip and shoulder angles. Conclusion: Even though hemiparetic patients revealed smaller joint excursions in the sagittal plane they showed a similar change on the gait standard as compared to healthy individuals, which was demonstrated with an increase in joint excursion but lower movement range when comparing the 2 surfaces.Introdução: A hemiparesia decorrente de Acidente Vascular Encefálico (AVE) gera uma desordem da marcha e comprometimento funcional destes indivíduos. Não se sabe se estes pacientes são capazes de responder à demanda ambiental durante a marcha da mesma forma que indivíduos sadios. O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar a influência do solo instável em um ciclo de marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos por AVE. Método: Trata-se de estudo exploratório transversal. Foram estudados 33 sujeitos, sendo 18 pacientes com AVE há mais de 6 meses, capazes de deambular sem auxilio e/ou aditamento por uma distancia mínima de 5 metros, e 15 indivíduos saudáveis sedentários, recrutados por conveniência, com idade e gênero semelhantes ao grupo de pacientes. Realizou-se análise cinemática 2D comparando-se um ciclo da marcha em solo estável e instável. Cinco ângulos foram quantificados: segmento do ombro, segmento da pelve, quadril, joelho e tornozelo. A velocidade e comprimento da passada foram medidos. Os dados obtidos foram submetidos à análise de variância e à análise de co-variância utilizando-se a velocidade como co-variável. A análise post-hoc foi realizada quando apropriado. Adotou-se um nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Houve diferença significativa entre os grupos e os solos nas variáveis analisadas, com exceção do ângulo da pelve que foi similar para os grupos e solos. Os pacientes apresentaram menor excursão dos ângulos analisados em relação ao grupo controle, exceto do segmento do ombro que apresentou maior excursão. As excursões de ambos os grupos aumentaram quando a marcha foi realizada em solo instável. O ajuste realizado pela velocidade eliminou a diferença entre os grupos em relação ao ângulo do quadril e do ombro. Conclusão: Apesar dos pacientes hemiparéticos apresentarem menores excursões articulares no plano sagital, estes demonstraram uma modificação do padrão de marcha similar aos indivíduos sadios representada pelo aumento da excursão articular porém com menor amplitude quando comparando os 2 solos.Universidade Cidade de São PauloBrasilPós-GraduaçãoPrograma de Pós-Graduação Mestrado em FisioterapiaUNICIDAlouche, Sandra Reginahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-0814http://lattes.cnpq.br/3369582197572337Bagesteiro, Leia Bernardihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6665280101818480Oliveira, Ludmila Costa Toni de2020-12-04T17:26:15Z2020-12-04T17:26:15Z2008-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfOLIVEIRA, Ludmila Costa Toni de. Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade. Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Sandra Regina Alouche. 2008. 54f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Fisioterapia) - Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. 2028.https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/1181por1. Alexander NB, Goldberg A. Gait disorders: search for multiple causes. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2005;72:586-599. 2. Bensoussan L, Mesure S, Viton J, Alain D. Kinematic and kinetic asymmetries in hemiplegic patients gait initiation patterns. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2007; 38:287 – 294. 3. Brown LA, Sleik RJ, Winder TR. Attentional demands for spatic postural control after stroke. Arch Phys med Rehabil 2002; 83:1732-5. 4. Bujanda ED, Nadeau S, Bourbonnais D, Dickstein R. Associations between lower limb impairments, locomotor capacities and kinematic variables in the frontal plane during wlaking in adults with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:259-264. 5. Bujanda ED, Nadeau S, Bourbonnais D. Pelvic and shoulder movements in frontal plane during treadmill walking in adults with stroke. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 2004;13:58-69. 6. Chambers HG, Sutherland DH. A Practical Guide to Gait Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2002;10: 222-231. 7. Chen H-C, Ashton-Miller JA, Alexander NB, Schultz AB. Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. J Gerontol 1991;46:196-203. 8. Chen CL, Chen HC, Tang SF, Wu CY, Cheng PT, Hong WH. Gait performance with compensatory adaptations in stroke patients with different degrees of motor recovery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:925-35. 9. Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, Zajac FE. Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait & Posture 2004; 22:1-6. 10. Chiu M, Wang M. The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait & Posture 2006;25:385-392. 11. Côrrea FI, Soares F, Andrade DV, Gondo RM, Peres JA, Fernandes AO et al. Atividade muscular durante a marcha após acidente vascular encefálico. Arq Neuropsiquiatria 2005;63:847-851. Crosbie J, Vachalathiti R, Smith R. Age, gender and speed on spinal kinematics during walking. Gait & Posture 1997;5:13-20. 12. Daly JJ, Sng K, Roenigk K, Fredrickson E, Dohring M. Intra-limb coordination deficit in stroke survivors and response to treatment. Gait & Posture 2007;25:412-418. 13. Haart M, Geurts AC, Huidekoper SC, Fasotti L, van Limbeek J. Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:886-95. 14. Huitema RB, Hof AL, Mulder T, Brouwer WH, Dekker R, Postema K. Functional recovery of gait and joint kinematics after right hemispheric stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(12):1982-1988. 15. Fatone S, Hansen AH. Effect of ankle-foot orthosis on roll-over shape in adults with hemiplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2007;44:11-20. 16. Frigo C, Rabuffetti M, Kerrigan CD, Deming LC, Pedotti A. Functionally oriented and clinically feasible quantitative gait analysis method. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1998;36, 179–185. 17. Frigo C, Carabalona R, Dalla Mura M, Negrini S. The upper body segmental movements during walking by young females. Clinical Biomechanics 2003;18:419-425. 18. Garcia RK, Nelson AJ, Ling W, Van Olden C. Comparing stepping-in-place and gait ability in adults with and without hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:36-42. 19. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM. Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1074-82. 20. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM. Gait after stroke: initial deficit and changes in temporal patterns for each gait phase. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82;1057-65. 21. Higginson JS, Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Delp SL. Muscle contributions to support during gait in an individual with post-stroke hemiparesis. Journal of Biomechanics 2005. 22. Hsu A, Tang P, Jan M. Analysis of impairments influencing gait velocity and asymmetry of hemiplegic patients after mild to moderate stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1185-93. 23. Jette DU, Latham NK, Smout RJ, Slavin MD, Horn SD. Physical Therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Phys Ther. 2005;85:238 –248. 24. Kim CM, Eng JJ. Magnitude and pattern of 3D kinematic and kinetic gait profiles in persons with stroke: relationship to walking speed. Gait & Posture 2004;20:140-146. 25. Kovacs C. Age-related changes in gait and obstacle avoidance capabilities in older adults. The Journal of Applied Gerontology 2005;24:21-34. 26. Kuan T-S, Tsou J-Y, Su F-C. Hemiplegic gait of stroke patients: the effect of using a cane. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:777-84. 27. Lee LW, Zavarei K, Evans J, Lelas JJ, Riley PO, Kerrigan DC. Reduced hip extension in the elderly: dynamic or postural? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1851-4. 28. Lin S-I. Motor function and joint position sense in relation to gait performance in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:197-203. 29. Lin P, Yang Y-R, Cheng S-J, Wang R-Y. The relation between ankle impairments and gait velocity and symmetry in people with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:562-8. 30. Lord SE, Rochester L, Weatherall M, McPherson KM, McNaughton HK. The effect of environment and task on gait parameters after stroke: a randomized comparison of measurement conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87: 967-73. 31. Lucarelli PRG, Greve JMA. Alteration of the load-response mechanism of the knee joint during hemiparetic gait following stroke analyzed by 3-dimensional kinematic. Clinics 2006;61(4):295-300. 32. Marigold DS, Patla AE. Adapting Locomotion to Different Surface Compliances: Neuromuscular Responses and Changes in Movement Dynamics. J Neurophysiol 2005; 94: 1733–1750. 33. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Age-related differences in walking stability. Age and Ageing 2003; 32:137-142. 34. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking are associate with risk of falling in community-dwelling older people. Journal of Gerontology 2002; 5:446-452. 35. Olney SJ, Griffin MP, McBride ID. Temporal, Kinematic, and Kinetic Variables Related to Gait Speed in Subjects With Hemiplegia: A Regression Approach. Physical Therapy 1994; 74:872-885. 36. Perry J. Análise de Marcha- marcha normal. 1ª ed. Barueri (SP): Manole; 2005. 37. Prince F, Corriveau H, Hébert R, Winter DA. Gait in elderly. Gait & Posture 1997; 5: 128-135. 38. Richards CL, Olney SJ. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics. Gait & Posture 1996;4:136-148. 39. Richards CL, Olney SJ. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part II: Recovery and Physical Therapy. Gait & Posture 1996;4:149-162. 40. Richardson JK, Thies SB, DeMott TK, Ashton-Miller JA. Interventions iprove gait regularity in patients with peripheral neuropathy while walking on an irregular surface under low light. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:510-515. 41. Riemann BL, Myers JB, Lephart SM. Comparison of the ankle, knee, hip, and trunk corrective action show during single-leg stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial surfaces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:90-5. 42. Said CM, Goldie PA, Patla AE, Sparrow WA. Effect of stroke on step characteristics of obstacle crossing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1712-9. 43. Shkuratova N, Morris ME, Huxham F. Effects of age on balance control during walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:582-8. 44. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications. Maryland: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. 45. Sporns O, Edelman GM. Solving Bernstein’s problem: a proposal for the development of coordinated movement by selection. Child Development 1993; 64: 960-981. 46. Thies SB, Richardson JK, Ashton-Miller JA. Effects of surface irregularity and lighting on step variability during gait: a study in healthy young and older women. Gait & Posture 2005;22:26-31. 47. Titianova EB, Pitkänen K, Pääkkönen A, Sivenius J, Tarkka IM: Gait characteristics and functional ambulation profile in patients with chronic unilateral stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:778–786. 48. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, et al. Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86:30–38. 49. Tuller B, Turvey MT, Fitch HL. The concept of muscle linkage or coordinative stricture. In: Kelso JAS. Human motor behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc; 1982. p. 253 50. Turnbull GI, Wall JC. Long-term changes in hemiplegic gait. Gait & Posture 1995;58:258-261. 51. Tyson SF. Trunk kinematics in hemiplegic gait and the effect of walking aids. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999; 13: 295–300. 52. Winter DA. Human balance and postural control during standing and walking. Gait & Posture 1995;3:193-214. 53. World Health Organization. WHO STEPS Stroke Manual: The WHO STEPwise approach to stroke surveillance. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2006. 54. Yavuzer G, Ergin S. Effect of an arm sling on gait pattern in patients with hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:960-3. 55. Yavuzer G, Eser F, Karakus D, Karaoglan B, Stam HJ. The effects of balance training on gait late after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2006;20: 960-969.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubasinstname:Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)instacron:CUB2020-12-04T17:27:47Zoai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br:123456789/1181Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.brazcubas.edu.br/oai/requestbibli@brazcubas.edu.bropendoar:2020-12-04T17:27:47Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas - Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade
title Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade
spellingShingle Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade
Oliveira, Ludmila Costa Toni de
Marcha
Acidente vascular encefálico
Biomecânica
Ambiente
FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
title_short Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade
title_full Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade
title_fullStr Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade
title_full_unstemmed Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade
title_sort Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade
author Oliveira, Ludmila Costa Toni de
author_facet Oliveira, Ludmila Costa Toni de
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Alouche, Sandra Regina
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-0814
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3369582197572337
Bagesteiro, Leia Bernardi
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6665280101818480
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Ludmila Costa Toni de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Marcha
Acidente vascular encefálico
Biomecânica
Ambiente
FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
topic Marcha
Acidente vascular encefálico
Biomecânica
Ambiente
FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
description Introduction: The hemiparesis occurring after a stroke generates walking disorders and functional deficits. The purpose of this study was to verify the influence of an uneven surface (medium-density foam) on the gait cycle of hemiparetic patients. Method: This exploratory, transversal study included 33 subjects: 18 stroke patients (6 months post-stroke onset or more) and 15 healthy individuals (control group) matched by age and gender. Subjects were able to ambulate without walking-aid for a 5-m minimum distance. A 2D kinematics gait analysis was performed comparing gait cycles in the two surfaces (regular and foam). Five different angles were quantified: shoulder segment and pelvic segment (frontal plane), and hip, knee and ankle angles (sagittal plane). Gait velocity and stride length were also calculated. Data was compared using variance and co-variance analyses having gait velocity as co-variable (post-hoc tests were performed when necessary). An alpha level of 0.05 was chosen for significance. Results: There were significant differences between groups and surfaces in all measured parameters but the pelvic angle, which was similar in all cases. Patients presented smaller angle excursions as compared in to healthy subjects, excepting the shoulder segment, which showed greater excursion. Both groups increased their excursions on the uneven surface. The velocity adjustment removed the difference between groups for hip and shoulder angles. Conclusion: Even though hemiparetic patients revealed smaller joint excursions in the sagittal plane they showed a similar change on the gait standard as compared to healthy individuals, which was demonstrated with an increase in joint excursion but lower movement range when comparing the 2 surfaces.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-30
2020-12-04T17:26:15Z
2020-12-04T17:26:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv OLIVEIRA, Ludmila Costa Toni de. Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade. Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Sandra Regina Alouche. 2008. 54f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Fisioterapia) - Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. 2028.
https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/1181
identifier_str_mv OLIVEIRA, Ludmila Costa Toni de. Análise da marcha de indivíduos hemiparéticos submetidos a instabilidade. Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Sandra Regina Alouche. 2008. 54f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Fisioterapia) - Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. 2028.
url https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/1181
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1. Alexander NB, Goldberg A. Gait disorders: search for multiple causes. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2005;72:586-599. 2. Bensoussan L, Mesure S, Viton J, Alain D. Kinematic and kinetic asymmetries in hemiplegic patients gait initiation patterns. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2007; 38:287 – 294. 3. Brown LA, Sleik RJ, Winder TR. Attentional demands for spatic postural control after stroke. Arch Phys med Rehabil 2002; 83:1732-5. 4. Bujanda ED, Nadeau S, Bourbonnais D, Dickstein R. Associations between lower limb impairments, locomotor capacities and kinematic variables in the frontal plane during wlaking in adults with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:259-264. 5. Bujanda ED, Nadeau S, Bourbonnais D. Pelvic and shoulder movements in frontal plane during treadmill walking in adults with stroke. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 2004;13:58-69. 6. Chambers HG, Sutherland DH. A Practical Guide to Gait Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2002;10: 222-231. 7. Chen H-C, Ashton-Miller JA, Alexander NB, Schultz AB. Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. J Gerontol 1991;46:196-203. 8. Chen CL, Chen HC, Tang SF, Wu CY, Cheng PT, Hong WH. Gait performance with compensatory adaptations in stroke patients with different degrees of motor recovery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:925-35. 9. Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, Zajac FE. Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait & Posture 2004; 22:1-6. 10. Chiu M, Wang M. The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait & Posture 2006;25:385-392. 11. Côrrea FI, Soares F, Andrade DV, Gondo RM, Peres JA, Fernandes AO et al. Atividade muscular durante a marcha após acidente vascular encefálico. Arq Neuropsiquiatria 2005;63:847-851. Crosbie J, Vachalathiti R, Smith R. Age, gender and speed on spinal kinematics during walking. Gait & Posture 1997;5:13-20. 12. Daly JJ, Sng K, Roenigk K, Fredrickson E, Dohring M. Intra-limb coordination deficit in stroke survivors and response to treatment. Gait & Posture 2007;25:412-418. 13. Haart M, Geurts AC, Huidekoper SC, Fasotti L, van Limbeek J. Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:886-95. 14. Huitema RB, Hof AL, Mulder T, Brouwer WH, Dekker R, Postema K. Functional recovery of gait and joint kinematics after right hemispheric stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(12):1982-1988. 15. Fatone S, Hansen AH. Effect of ankle-foot orthosis on roll-over shape in adults with hemiplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2007;44:11-20. 16. Frigo C, Rabuffetti M, Kerrigan CD, Deming LC, Pedotti A. Functionally oriented and clinically feasible quantitative gait analysis method. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1998;36, 179–185. 17. Frigo C, Carabalona R, Dalla Mura M, Negrini S. The upper body segmental movements during walking by young females. Clinical Biomechanics 2003;18:419-425. 18. Garcia RK, Nelson AJ, Ling W, Van Olden C. Comparing stepping-in-place and gait ability in adults with and without hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:36-42. 19. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM. Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1074-82. 20. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM. Gait after stroke: initial deficit and changes in temporal patterns for each gait phase. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82;1057-65. 21. Higginson JS, Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Delp SL. Muscle contributions to support during gait in an individual with post-stroke hemiparesis. Journal of Biomechanics 2005. 22. Hsu A, Tang P, Jan M. Analysis of impairments influencing gait velocity and asymmetry of hemiplegic patients after mild to moderate stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1185-93. 23. Jette DU, Latham NK, Smout RJ, Slavin MD, Horn SD. Physical Therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Phys Ther. 2005;85:238 –248. 24. Kim CM, Eng JJ. Magnitude and pattern of 3D kinematic and kinetic gait profiles in persons with stroke: relationship to walking speed. Gait & Posture 2004;20:140-146. 25. Kovacs C. Age-related changes in gait and obstacle avoidance capabilities in older adults. The Journal of Applied Gerontology 2005;24:21-34. 26. Kuan T-S, Tsou J-Y, Su F-C. Hemiplegic gait of stroke patients: the effect of using a cane. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:777-84. 27. Lee LW, Zavarei K, Evans J, Lelas JJ, Riley PO, Kerrigan DC. Reduced hip extension in the elderly: dynamic or postural? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1851-4. 28. Lin S-I. Motor function and joint position sense in relation to gait performance in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:197-203. 29. Lin P, Yang Y-R, Cheng S-J, Wang R-Y. The relation between ankle impairments and gait velocity and symmetry in people with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:562-8. 30. Lord SE, Rochester L, Weatherall M, McPherson KM, McNaughton HK. The effect of environment and task on gait parameters after stroke: a randomized comparison of measurement conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87: 967-73. 31. Lucarelli PRG, Greve JMA. Alteration of the load-response mechanism of the knee joint during hemiparetic gait following stroke analyzed by 3-dimensional kinematic. Clinics 2006;61(4):295-300. 32. Marigold DS, Patla AE. Adapting Locomotion to Different Surface Compliances: Neuromuscular Responses and Changes in Movement Dynamics. J Neurophysiol 2005; 94: 1733–1750. 33. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Age-related differences in walking stability. Age and Ageing 2003; 32:137-142. 34. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking are associate with risk of falling in community-dwelling older people. Journal of Gerontology 2002; 5:446-452. 35. Olney SJ, Griffin MP, McBride ID. Temporal, Kinematic, and Kinetic Variables Related to Gait Speed in Subjects With Hemiplegia: A Regression Approach. Physical Therapy 1994; 74:872-885. 36. Perry J. Análise de Marcha- marcha normal. 1ª ed. Barueri (SP): Manole; 2005. 37. Prince F, Corriveau H, Hébert R, Winter DA. Gait in elderly. Gait & Posture 1997; 5: 128-135. 38. Richards CL, Olney SJ. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics. Gait & Posture 1996;4:136-148. 39. Richards CL, Olney SJ. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part II: Recovery and Physical Therapy. Gait & Posture 1996;4:149-162. 40. Richardson JK, Thies SB, DeMott TK, Ashton-Miller JA. Interventions iprove gait regularity in patients with peripheral neuropathy while walking on an irregular surface under low light. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:510-515. 41. Riemann BL, Myers JB, Lephart SM. Comparison of the ankle, knee, hip, and trunk corrective action show during single-leg stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial surfaces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:90-5. 42. Said CM, Goldie PA, Patla AE, Sparrow WA. Effect of stroke on step characteristics of obstacle crossing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1712-9. 43. Shkuratova N, Morris ME, Huxham F. Effects of age on balance control during walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:582-8. 44. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications. Maryland: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. 45. Sporns O, Edelman GM. Solving Bernstein’s problem: a proposal for the development of coordinated movement by selection. Child Development 1993; 64: 960-981. 46. Thies SB, Richardson JK, Ashton-Miller JA. Effects of surface irregularity and lighting on step variability during gait: a study in healthy young and older women. Gait & Posture 2005;22:26-31. 47. Titianova EB, Pitkänen K, Pääkkönen A, Sivenius J, Tarkka IM: Gait characteristics and functional ambulation profile in patients with chronic unilateral stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:778–786. 48. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, et al. Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86:30–38. 49. Tuller B, Turvey MT, Fitch HL. The concept of muscle linkage or coordinative stricture. In: Kelso JAS. Human motor behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc; 1982. p. 253 50. Turnbull GI, Wall JC. Long-term changes in hemiplegic gait. Gait & Posture 1995;58:258-261. 51. Tyson SF. Trunk kinematics in hemiplegic gait and the effect of walking aids. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999; 13: 295–300. 52. Winter DA. Human balance and postural control during standing and walking. Gait & Posture 1995;3:193-214. 53. World Health Organization. WHO STEPS Stroke Manual: The WHO STEPwise approach to stroke surveillance. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2006. 54. Yavuzer G, Ergin S. Effect of an arm sling on gait pattern in patients with hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:960-3. 55. Yavuzer G, Eser F, Karakus D, Karaoglan B, Stam HJ. The effects of balance training on gait late after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2006;20: 960-969.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cidade de São Paulo
Brasil
Pós-Graduação
Programa de Pós-Graduação Mestrado em Fisioterapia
UNICID
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cidade de São Paulo
Brasil
Pós-Graduação
Programa de Pós-Graduação Mestrado em Fisioterapia
UNICID
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
instname:Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)
instacron:CUB
instname_str Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)
instacron_str CUB
institution CUB
reponame_str Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
collection Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas - Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibli@brazcubas.edu.br
_version_ 1798311333125423104