Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marchi,Rodrigo De
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Marchi,Luciana Manzotti De, Terada,Raquel Sano Suga, Terada,Hélio Hissashi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600024
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess - using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) - the effectiveness of two abrasive discs, one made from silicon and one from aluminum oxide, in removing adhesive remnants (AR) after debonding orthodontic brackets. METHODS: Ten randomly selected bovine teeth were used, i.e., 2 in the control group, and the other 8 divided into two groups, which had orthodontic brackets bonded to their surface with Concise Orthodontic Adhesive (3M). The following methods were employed - in one single step - to remove AR after debracketing: Group A, Optimize discs (TDV) and Group B, Onegloss discs (Shofu), used at low speed. After removing the AR with the aforementioned methods, the teeth were prepared to undergo SEM analysis, and photographs were taken of the enamel surface with 50x magnification. Six examiners evaluated the photographs applying the Zachrisson and Årtun enamel surface index (ESI) system (1979). RESULTS: Group A exhibited minor scratches on the enamel surface as well as some AR in some of the photographs, while Group B showed a smoother surface, little or no AR and some abrasion marks in the photographs. No statistically significant differences were found between the two methods and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The two abrasive discs were effective in removing the AR after bracket debonding in one single step.
id DPI-1_00b7a185c67de3a95c9ae9a546f1d0f2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512012000600024
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debondingOrthodonticsScanning electron microscopyBrackets debondingOrthodontic bracketsTooth enamelOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess - using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) - the effectiveness of two abrasive discs, one made from silicon and one from aluminum oxide, in removing adhesive remnants (AR) after debonding orthodontic brackets. METHODS: Ten randomly selected bovine teeth were used, i.e., 2 in the control group, and the other 8 divided into two groups, which had orthodontic brackets bonded to their surface with Concise Orthodontic Adhesive (3M). The following methods were employed - in one single step - to remove AR after debracketing: Group A, Optimize discs (TDV) and Group B, Onegloss discs (Shofu), used at low speed. After removing the AR with the aforementioned methods, the teeth were prepared to undergo SEM analysis, and photographs were taken of the enamel surface with 50x magnification. Six examiners evaluated the photographs applying the Zachrisson and Årtun enamel surface index (ESI) system (1979). RESULTS: Group A exhibited minor scratches on the enamel surface as well as some AR in some of the photographs, while Group B showed a smoother surface, little or no AR and some abrasion marks in the photographs. No statistically significant differences were found between the two methods and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The two abrasive discs were effective in removing the AR after bracket debonding in one single step.Dental Press International2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600024Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.6 2012reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/S2176-94512012000600024info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarchi,Rodrigo DeMarchi,Luciana Manzotti DeTerada,Raquel Sano SugaTerada,Hélio Hissashieng2013-03-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512012000600024Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2013-03-27T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding
title Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding
spellingShingle Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding
Marchi,Rodrigo De
Orthodontics
Scanning electron microscopy
Brackets debonding
Orthodontic brackets
Tooth enamel
title_short Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding
title_full Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding
title_fullStr Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding
title_sort Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding
author Marchi,Rodrigo De
author_facet Marchi,Rodrigo De
Marchi,Luciana Manzotti De
Terada,Raquel Sano Suga
Terada,Hélio Hissashi
author_role author
author2 Marchi,Luciana Manzotti De
Terada,Raquel Sano Suga
Terada,Hélio Hissashi
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marchi,Rodrigo De
Marchi,Luciana Manzotti De
Terada,Raquel Sano Suga
Terada,Hélio Hissashi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontics
Scanning electron microscopy
Brackets debonding
Orthodontic brackets
Tooth enamel
topic Orthodontics
Scanning electron microscopy
Brackets debonding
Orthodontic brackets
Tooth enamel
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess - using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) - the effectiveness of two abrasive discs, one made from silicon and one from aluminum oxide, in removing adhesive remnants (AR) after debonding orthodontic brackets. METHODS: Ten randomly selected bovine teeth were used, i.e., 2 in the control group, and the other 8 divided into two groups, which had orthodontic brackets bonded to their surface with Concise Orthodontic Adhesive (3M). The following methods were employed - in one single step - to remove AR after debracketing: Group A, Optimize discs (TDV) and Group B, Onegloss discs (Shofu), used at low speed. After removing the AR with the aforementioned methods, the teeth were prepared to undergo SEM analysis, and photographs were taken of the enamel surface with 50x magnification. Six examiners evaluated the photographs applying the Zachrisson and Årtun enamel surface index (ESI) system (1979). RESULTS: Group A exhibited minor scratches on the enamel surface as well as some AR in some of the photographs, while Group B showed a smoother surface, little or no AR and some abrasion marks in the photographs. No statistically significant differences were found between the two methods and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The two abrasive discs were effective in removing the AR after bracket debonding in one single step.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600024
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600024
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2176-94512012000600024
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.6 2012
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122396350021632