Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Thiesen,Guilherme
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Freitas,Maria Perpétua Mota, Gribel,Bruno Frazão, Kim,Ki Beom
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000400054
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: The present study aims at using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to analyze the maxillomandibular characteristics present in adults with mandibular asymmetries and different sagittal jaw relationships. Methods: 360 patients were selected and divided into three groups (Class I, Class II, and Class III), with 120 individuals per group. The groups were then subdivided according to the intensity of lateral deviation of the gnathion point, into: 1) relative symmetry, 2) moderate asymmetry, and 3) severe asymmetry. Three planes of reference were established in the CBCT images and several measurements were taken to compare the bilateral skeletal differences between the intensities of asymmetry for the different sagittal jaw relationships. Results: When the groups were compared by the intensity of asymmetry, significant differences among patients with relative symmetry and moderate to severe asymmetry were found. This was especially noticed for severe asymmetry, suggesting that the deviation of the chin did not constitute the only morphological alteration for these patients, especially because a series of measurements showed significant bilateral differences. When comparing sagittal jaw relationships, the only significant finding was the vertical positioning of the gonion between Class II and III patients with severe asymmetry. Conclusions: When comparing the three sagittal jaw relationships with the same intensity of asymmetry, most maxillofacial aspects were quite similar. The only difference was found for patients with severe asymmetry, as the individuals with Class II showed greater bilateral difference in the vertical positioning of the gonion, when compared to patients with Class III.
id DPI-1_087713cf07cba10ddc500367dbdd0039
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512019000400054
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationshipsFacial asymmetryMalocclusions3-D imagingCone-beam computed tomographyABSTRACT Objective: The present study aims at using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to analyze the maxillomandibular characteristics present in adults with mandibular asymmetries and different sagittal jaw relationships. Methods: 360 patients were selected and divided into three groups (Class I, Class II, and Class III), with 120 individuals per group. The groups were then subdivided according to the intensity of lateral deviation of the gnathion point, into: 1) relative symmetry, 2) moderate asymmetry, and 3) severe asymmetry. Three planes of reference were established in the CBCT images and several measurements were taken to compare the bilateral skeletal differences between the intensities of asymmetry for the different sagittal jaw relationships. Results: When the groups were compared by the intensity of asymmetry, significant differences among patients with relative symmetry and moderate to severe asymmetry were found. This was especially noticed for severe asymmetry, suggesting that the deviation of the chin did not constitute the only morphological alteration for these patients, especially because a series of measurements showed significant bilateral differences. When comparing sagittal jaw relationships, the only significant finding was the vertical positioning of the gonion between Class II and III patients with severe asymmetry. Conclusions: When comparing the three sagittal jaw relationships with the same intensity of asymmetry, most maxillofacial aspects were quite similar. The only difference was found for patients with severe asymmetry, as the individuals with Class II showed greater bilateral difference in the vertical positioning of the gonion, when compared to patients with Class III.Dental Press International2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000400054Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.24 n.4 2019reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.054-062.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThiesen,GuilhermeFreitas,Maria Perpétua MotaGribel,Bruno FrazãoKim,Ki Beomeng2020-01-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512019000400054Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2020-01-21T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships
title Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships
spellingShingle Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships
Thiesen,Guilherme
Facial asymmetry
Malocclusions
3-D imaging
Cone-beam computed tomography
title_short Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships
title_full Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships
title_fullStr Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships
title_sort Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships
author Thiesen,Guilherme
author_facet Thiesen,Guilherme
Freitas,Maria Perpétua Mota
Gribel,Bruno Frazão
Kim,Ki Beom
author_role author
author2 Freitas,Maria Perpétua Mota
Gribel,Bruno Frazão
Kim,Ki Beom
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Thiesen,Guilherme
Freitas,Maria Perpétua Mota
Gribel,Bruno Frazão
Kim,Ki Beom
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Facial asymmetry
Malocclusions
3-D imaging
Cone-beam computed tomography
topic Facial asymmetry
Malocclusions
3-D imaging
Cone-beam computed tomography
description ABSTRACT Objective: The present study aims at using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to analyze the maxillomandibular characteristics present in adults with mandibular asymmetries and different sagittal jaw relationships. Methods: 360 patients were selected and divided into three groups (Class I, Class II, and Class III), with 120 individuals per group. The groups were then subdivided according to the intensity of lateral deviation of the gnathion point, into: 1) relative symmetry, 2) moderate asymmetry, and 3) severe asymmetry. Three planes of reference were established in the CBCT images and several measurements were taken to compare the bilateral skeletal differences between the intensities of asymmetry for the different sagittal jaw relationships. Results: When the groups were compared by the intensity of asymmetry, significant differences among patients with relative symmetry and moderate to severe asymmetry were found. This was especially noticed for severe asymmetry, suggesting that the deviation of the chin did not constitute the only morphological alteration for these patients, especially because a series of measurements showed significant bilateral differences. When comparing sagittal jaw relationships, the only significant finding was the vertical positioning of the gonion between Class II and III patients with severe asymmetry. Conclusions: When comparing the three sagittal jaw relationships with the same intensity of asymmetry, most maxillofacial aspects were quite similar. The only difference was found for patients with severe asymmetry, as the individuals with Class II showed greater bilateral difference in the vertical positioning of the gonion, when compared to patients with Class III.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000400054
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000400054
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.054-062.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.24 n.4 2019
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122398475485184