Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loading
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000200073 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to clinically and radiographically assess the peri-implant conditions of implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Methods: Two groups were studied: 1) a test group in which osseointegrated implants were used as orthodontic anchorage, with the application of 200-cN force; and 2) a control group in which implants were not subjected to orthodontic force, but supported a screw-retained prosthesis. Clinical evaluations were performed three, six and nine months after prosthesis installation and 1- and 3-year follow-up examinations. Intraoral periapical radiographs were obtained 30 days after surgical implant placement, at the time of prosthesis installation, and one, two and three years thereafter. The results were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in clinical probing depth (p = 0.1078) or mesial and distal crestal bone resorption (p = 0.1832) during the study period. After three years of follow-up, the mean probing depth was 2.21 mm for the control group and 2.39 mm for the test group. The implants of the control group showed a mean distance between the bone crest and implant shoulder of 2.39 mm, whereas the implants used as orthodontic anchorage showed a mean distance of 2.58 mm at the distal site. Conclusion: Results suggest that the use of stable intraoral orthodontic anchorage did not compromise the health of peri-implant tissues or the longevity of the implant. |
id |
DPI-1_2a2b5b7de3247969d92663ccc9eaacd0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512016000200073 |
network_acronym_str |
DPI-1 |
network_name_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loadingBonesDental implantsOrthodontic appliancesOsseointegrationABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to clinically and radiographically assess the peri-implant conditions of implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Methods: Two groups were studied: 1) a test group in which osseointegrated implants were used as orthodontic anchorage, with the application of 200-cN force; and 2) a control group in which implants were not subjected to orthodontic force, but supported a screw-retained prosthesis. Clinical evaluations were performed three, six and nine months after prosthesis installation and 1- and 3-year follow-up examinations. Intraoral periapical radiographs were obtained 30 days after surgical implant placement, at the time of prosthesis installation, and one, two and three years thereafter. The results were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in clinical probing depth (p = 0.1078) or mesial and distal crestal bone resorption (p = 0.1832) during the study period. After three years of follow-up, the mean probing depth was 2.21 mm for the control group and 2.39 mm for the test group. The implants of the control group showed a mean distance between the bone crest and implant shoulder of 2.39 mm, whereas the implants used as orthodontic anchorage showed a mean distance of 2.58 mm at the distal site. Conclusion: Results suggest that the use of stable intraoral orthodontic anchorage did not compromise the health of peri-implant tissues or the longevity of the implant.Dental Press International2016-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000200073Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.2 2016reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.073-080.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarins,Bruna de RezendePramiu,Suy EllenBusato,Mauro Carlos AgnerMarchi,Luiz CarlosTogashi,Adriane Yaekoeng2016-10-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512016000200073Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2016-10-13T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loading |
title |
Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loading |
spellingShingle |
Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loading Marins,Bruna de Rezende Bones Dental implants Orthodontic appliances Osseointegration |
title_short |
Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loading |
title_full |
Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loading |
title_fullStr |
Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loading |
title_full_unstemmed |
Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loading |
title_sort |
Peri-implant evaluation of osseointegrated implants subjected to orthodontic forces: results after three years of functional loading |
author |
Marins,Bruna de Rezende |
author_facet |
Marins,Bruna de Rezende Pramiu,Suy Ellen Busato,Mauro Carlos Agner Marchi,Luiz Carlos Togashi,Adriane Yaeko |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pramiu,Suy Ellen Busato,Mauro Carlos Agner Marchi,Luiz Carlos Togashi,Adriane Yaeko |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marins,Bruna de Rezende Pramiu,Suy Ellen Busato,Mauro Carlos Agner Marchi,Luiz Carlos Togashi,Adriane Yaeko |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bones Dental implants Orthodontic appliances Osseointegration |
topic |
Bones Dental implants Orthodontic appliances Osseointegration |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to clinically and radiographically assess the peri-implant conditions of implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Methods: Two groups were studied: 1) a test group in which osseointegrated implants were used as orthodontic anchorage, with the application of 200-cN force; and 2) a control group in which implants were not subjected to orthodontic force, but supported a screw-retained prosthesis. Clinical evaluations were performed three, six and nine months after prosthesis installation and 1- and 3-year follow-up examinations. Intraoral periapical radiographs were obtained 30 days after surgical implant placement, at the time of prosthesis installation, and one, two and three years thereafter. The results were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in clinical probing depth (p = 0.1078) or mesial and distal crestal bone resorption (p = 0.1832) during the study period. After three years of follow-up, the mean probing depth was 2.21 mm for the control group and 2.39 mm for the test group. The implants of the control group showed a mean distance between the bone crest and implant shoulder of 2.39 mm, whereas the implants used as orthodontic anchorage showed a mean distance of 2.58 mm at the distal site. Conclusion: Results suggest that the use of stable intraoral orthodontic anchorage did not compromise the health of peri-implant tissues or the longevity of the implant. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000200073 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000200073 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.073-080.oar |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.2 2016 reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics instname:Dental Press International (DPI) instacron:DPI |
instname_str |
Dental Press International (DPI) |
instacron_str |
DPI |
institution |
DPI |
reponame_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
collection |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1754122397622992896 |