Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600018 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to obtain information about the relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with canine impaction and 73 control patients, without canine impaction, were evaluated. The mesiodistal distances of the maxillary lateral incisors adjacent to the impacted canines and the correspondent mandibular lateral incisors were measured. The adjacent lateral incisors were classified in: 1 - absent, 2 - small, 3 - peg-shaped, 4 - standard. RESULTS: The results showed that among the patients with impacted canines, there were 21 anomalous teeth (small and peg-shaped) and among the control patients there were only three small and peg-shaped teeth, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). No patients were found with impacted canines and absent lateral incisors. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that in patients with anomalous lateral incisors (small and peg-shaped) there is a probability to present impacted canines and this must be considered. |
id |
DPI-1_54434c3e04ccb513d72978ed22d26497 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512012000600018 |
network_acronym_str |
DPI-1 |
network_name_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impactionIncisorsCanineAgenesisOBJECTIVE: The purpose was to obtain information about the relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with canine impaction and 73 control patients, without canine impaction, were evaluated. The mesiodistal distances of the maxillary lateral incisors adjacent to the impacted canines and the correspondent mandibular lateral incisors were measured. The adjacent lateral incisors were classified in: 1 - absent, 2 - small, 3 - peg-shaped, 4 - standard. RESULTS: The results showed that among the patients with impacted canines, there were 21 anomalous teeth (small and peg-shaped) and among the control patients there were only three small and peg-shaped teeth, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). No patients were found with impacted canines and absent lateral incisors. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that in patients with anomalous lateral incisors (small and peg-shaped) there is a probability to present impacted canines and this must be considered.Dental Press International2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600018Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.6 2012reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/S2176-94512012000600018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho,Anísio Bueno deMotta,Rogério Heladio LopesCarvalho,Eliane Maria Duarte deeng2013-03-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512012000600018Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2013-03-27T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction |
title |
Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction |
spellingShingle |
Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction Carvalho,Anísio Bueno de Incisors Canine Agenesis |
title_short |
Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction |
title_full |
Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction |
title_fullStr |
Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction |
title_sort |
Relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction |
author |
Carvalho,Anísio Bueno de |
author_facet |
Carvalho,Anísio Bueno de Motta,Rogério Heladio Lopes Carvalho,Eliane Maria Duarte de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Motta,Rogério Heladio Lopes Carvalho,Eliane Maria Duarte de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho,Anísio Bueno de Motta,Rogério Heladio Lopes Carvalho,Eliane Maria Duarte de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Incisors Canine Agenesis |
topic |
Incisors Canine Agenesis |
description |
OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to obtain information about the relation between agenesis and shape anomaly of maxillary lateral incisors and canine impaction. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with canine impaction and 73 control patients, without canine impaction, were evaluated. The mesiodistal distances of the maxillary lateral incisors adjacent to the impacted canines and the correspondent mandibular lateral incisors were measured. The adjacent lateral incisors were classified in: 1 - absent, 2 - small, 3 - peg-shaped, 4 - standard. RESULTS: The results showed that among the patients with impacted canines, there were 21 anomalous teeth (small and peg-shaped) and among the control patients there were only three small and peg-shaped teeth, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). No patients were found with impacted canines and absent lateral incisors. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that in patients with anomalous lateral incisors (small and peg-shaped) there is a probability to present impacted canines and this must be considered. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600018 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600018 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S2176-94512012000600018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.6 2012 reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics instname:Dental Press International (DPI) instacron:DPI |
instname_str |
Dental Press International (DPI) |
instacron_str |
DPI |
institution |
DPI |
reponame_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
collection |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1754122396340584448 |