Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo,Andréa Reis de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Conti,Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira, Almeida-Pedrin,Renata Rodrigues, Didier,Victor, Valarelli,Danilo Pinelli, Capelozza Filho,Leopoldino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512017000100075
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the facial attractiveness in 30 black individuals, according to the Subjective Facial Analysis criteria. Methods: Frontal and profile view photographs of 30 black individuals were evaluated for facial attractiveness and classified as esthetically unpleasant, acceptable, or pleasant by 50 evaluators: the 30 individuals from the sample, 10 orthodontists, and 10 laymen. Besides assessing the facial attractiveness, the evaluators had to identify the structures responsible for the classification as unpleasant and pleasant. Intraexaminer agreement was assessed by using Spearman's correlation, correlation within each category using Kendall concordance coefficient, and correlation between the 3 categories using chi-square test and proportions. Results: Most of the frontal (53. 5%) and profile view (54. 9%) photographs were classified as esthetically acceptable. The structures most identified as esthetically unpleasant were the mouth, lips, and face, in the frontal view; and nose and chin in the profile view. The structures most identified as esthetically pleasant were harmony, face, and mouth, in the frontal view; and harmony and nose in the profile view. The ratings by the examiners in the sample and laymen groups showed statistically significant correlation in both views. The orthodontists agreed with the laymen on the evaluation of the frontal view and disagreed on profile view, especially regarding whether the images were esthetically unpleasant or acceptable. Conclusions: Based on these results, the evaluation of facial attractiveness according to the Subjective Facial Analysis criteria proved to be applicable and to have a subjective influence; therefore, it is suggested that the patient's opinion regarding the facial esthetics should be considered in orthodontic treatmentplanning.
id DPI-1_a4dacb740439bac636f65d89de2b23d6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512017000100075
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteriaOrthodonticsDiagnosisFaceProfileBlack.ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the facial attractiveness in 30 black individuals, according to the Subjective Facial Analysis criteria. Methods: Frontal and profile view photographs of 30 black individuals were evaluated for facial attractiveness and classified as esthetically unpleasant, acceptable, or pleasant by 50 evaluators: the 30 individuals from the sample, 10 orthodontists, and 10 laymen. Besides assessing the facial attractiveness, the evaluators had to identify the structures responsible for the classification as unpleasant and pleasant. Intraexaminer agreement was assessed by using Spearman's correlation, correlation within each category using Kendall concordance coefficient, and correlation between the 3 categories using chi-square test and proportions. Results: Most of the frontal (53. 5%) and profile view (54. 9%) photographs were classified as esthetically acceptable. The structures most identified as esthetically unpleasant were the mouth, lips, and face, in the frontal view; and nose and chin in the profile view. The structures most identified as esthetically pleasant were harmony, face, and mouth, in the frontal view; and harmony and nose in the profile view. The ratings by the examiners in the sample and laymen groups showed statistically significant correlation in both views. The orthodontists agreed with the laymen on the evaluation of the frontal view and disagreed on profile view, especially regarding whether the images were esthetically unpleasant or acceptable. Conclusions: Based on these results, the evaluation of facial attractiveness according to the Subjective Facial Analysis criteria proved to be applicable and to have a subjective influence; therefore, it is suggested that the patient's opinion regarding the facial esthetics should be considered in orthodontic treatmentplanning.Dental Press International2017-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512017000100075Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.22 n.1 2017reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.075-081.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo,Andréa Reis deConti,Ana Cláudia de Castro FerreiraAlmeida-Pedrin,Renata RodriguesDidier,VictorValarelli,Danilo PinelliCapelozza Filho,Leopoldinoeng2017-04-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512017000100075Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2017-04-12T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria
title Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria
spellingShingle Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria
Melo,Andréa Reis de
Orthodontics
Diagnosis
Face
Profile
Black.
title_short Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria
title_full Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria
title_fullStr Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria
title_sort Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria
author Melo,Andréa Reis de
author_facet Melo,Andréa Reis de
Conti,Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira
Almeida-Pedrin,Renata Rodrigues
Didier,Victor
Valarelli,Danilo Pinelli
Capelozza Filho,Leopoldino
author_role author
author2 Conti,Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira
Almeida-Pedrin,Renata Rodrigues
Didier,Victor
Valarelli,Danilo Pinelli
Capelozza Filho,Leopoldino
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo,Andréa Reis de
Conti,Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira
Almeida-Pedrin,Renata Rodrigues
Didier,Victor
Valarelli,Danilo Pinelli
Capelozza Filho,Leopoldino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontics
Diagnosis
Face
Profile
Black.
topic Orthodontics
Diagnosis
Face
Profile
Black.
description ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the facial attractiveness in 30 black individuals, according to the Subjective Facial Analysis criteria. Methods: Frontal and profile view photographs of 30 black individuals were evaluated for facial attractiveness and classified as esthetically unpleasant, acceptable, or pleasant by 50 evaluators: the 30 individuals from the sample, 10 orthodontists, and 10 laymen. Besides assessing the facial attractiveness, the evaluators had to identify the structures responsible for the classification as unpleasant and pleasant. Intraexaminer agreement was assessed by using Spearman's correlation, correlation within each category using Kendall concordance coefficient, and correlation between the 3 categories using chi-square test and proportions. Results: Most of the frontal (53. 5%) and profile view (54. 9%) photographs were classified as esthetically acceptable. The structures most identified as esthetically unpleasant were the mouth, lips, and face, in the frontal view; and nose and chin in the profile view. The structures most identified as esthetically pleasant were harmony, face, and mouth, in the frontal view; and harmony and nose in the profile view. The ratings by the examiners in the sample and laymen groups showed statistically significant correlation in both views. The orthodontists agreed with the laymen on the evaluation of the frontal view and disagreed on profile view, especially regarding whether the images were esthetically unpleasant or acceptable. Conclusions: Based on these results, the evaluation of facial attractiveness according to the Subjective Facial Analysis criteria proved to be applicable and to have a subjective influence; therefore, it is suggested that the patient's opinion regarding the facial esthetics should be considered in orthodontic treatmentplanning.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512017000100075
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512017000100075
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.075-081.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.22 n.1 2017
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122397714219008