Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Feres,Murilo Fernando Neuppmann
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Muniz,Tomas Salomão, Andrade,Saulo Henrique de, Lemos,Maurilo de Mello, Pignatari,Shirley Shizue Nagata
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000400068
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cephalometric pattern of children with and without adenoid obstruction.METHODS: The sample comprised 100 children aged between four and 14 years old, both males and females, subjected to cephalometric examination for sagittal and vertical skeletal analysis. The sample also underwent nasofiberendoscopic examination intended to objectively assess the degree of adenoid obstruction.RESULTS: The individuals presented tendencies towards vertical craniofacial growth, convex profile and mandibular retrusion. However, there were no differences between obstructive and non-obstructive patients concerning all cephalometric variables. Correlations between skeletal parameters and the percentage of adenoid obstruction were either low or not significant.CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that specific craniofacial patterns, such as Class II and hyperdivergency, might not be associated with adenoid hypertrophy.
id DPI-1_b85cbcb1321eec62a074fe60249a07a1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512015000400068
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?Mouth breathingDiagnosisAngle Class II malocclusionOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cephalometric pattern of children with and without adenoid obstruction.METHODS: The sample comprised 100 children aged between four and 14 years old, both males and females, subjected to cephalometric examination for sagittal and vertical skeletal analysis. The sample also underwent nasofiberendoscopic examination intended to objectively assess the degree of adenoid obstruction.RESULTS: The individuals presented tendencies towards vertical craniofacial growth, convex profile and mandibular retrusion. However, there were no differences between obstructive and non-obstructive patients concerning all cephalometric variables. Correlations between skeletal parameters and the percentage of adenoid obstruction were either low or not significant.CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that specific craniofacial patterns, such as Class II and hyperdivergency, might not be associated with adenoid hypertrophy.Dental Press International2015-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000400068Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.20 n.4 2015reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2176-9451.20.4.068-075.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFeres,Murilo Fernando NeuppmannMuniz,Tomas SalomãoAndrade,Saulo Henrique deLemos,Maurilo de MelloPignatari,Shirley Shizue Nagataeng2015-09-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512015000400068Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2015-09-08T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?
title Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?
spellingShingle Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?
Feres,Murilo Fernando Neuppmann
Mouth breathing
Diagnosis
Angle Class II malocclusion
title_short Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?
title_full Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?
title_fullStr Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?
title_full_unstemmed Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?
title_sort Craniofacial skeletal pattern: is it really correlated with the degree of adenoid obstruction?
author Feres,Murilo Fernando Neuppmann
author_facet Feres,Murilo Fernando Neuppmann
Muniz,Tomas Salomão
Andrade,Saulo Henrique de
Lemos,Maurilo de Mello
Pignatari,Shirley Shizue Nagata
author_role author
author2 Muniz,Tomas Salomão
Andrade,Saulo Henrique de
Lemos,Maurilo de Mello
Pignatari,Shirley Shizue Nagata
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Feres,Murilo Fernando Neuppmann
Muniz,Tomas Salomão
Andrade,Saulo Henrique de
Lemos,Maurilo de Mello
Pignatari,Shirley Shizue Nagata
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mouth breathing
Diagnosis
Angle Class II malocclusion
topic Mouth breathing
Diagnosis
Angle Class II malocclusion
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cephalometric pattern of children with and without adenoid obstruction.METHODS: The sample comprised 100 children aged between four and 14 years old, both males and females, subjected to cephalometric examination for sagittal and vertical skeletal analysis. The sample also underwent nasofiberendoscopic examination intended to objectively assess the degree of adenoid obstruction.RESULTS: The individuals presented tendencies towards vertical craniofacial growth, convex profile and mandibular retrusion. However, there were no differences between obstructive and non-obstructive patients concerning all cephalometric variables. Correlations between skeletal parameters and the percentage of adenoid obstruction were either low or not significant.CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that specific craniofacial patterns, such as Class II and hyperdivergency, might not be associated with adenoid hypertrophy.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000400068
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000400068
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2176-9451.20.4.068-075.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.20 n.4 2015
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122397280108544

Registros relacionados