Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: NASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique Andrade
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: BRANDÃO,Karla Magnólia Napoli, MENEZES,Carolina Carmo de, MACHADO,André Wilson, SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000600301
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: The vertical position of orthodontic brackets in maxillary incisors may influence the incisal step between the anterior teeth and thereby interfere with the smile esthetics. Even so, esthetic standards have been modified over time and consistently required technical adjustments. Objective: This study analyzed orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary central incisors (MCI) and maxillary lateral incisors (MLI), and further determined whether the orthodontist sex, age and time of specialization have association to their choices. Methods: This study collected data through an electronic form. Study participants analyzed a clinical case in which they indicated their preference for bracket bonding height. The placement height options ranged from 3.0 mm to 5.5 mm from the incisal edge, with 0.5-mm intervals, or at the clinical crown center (CCC). The difference in the bonding height between the MCI and MLI was analyzed, considering the formation of incisal steps between these teeth. Results: Participants indicated that the difference in bracket bonding height between the MCI and MLI should be as follows: 0 mm (3.9%); 0.5 mm (78.3%); 1 mm (7.6%); 1.5 mm (0.2%); and CCC (9.9%). There was no statistically significant correlation between the choice for bracket bonding height and sex, age and time since specialization. Conclusion: Most participating orthodontists choose the 0.5-mm difference in bracket placement height between the MCI and MLI. The variables sex, age and time since specialization did not influence this choice.
id DPI-1_cad223b502bba90d81b1260f072f11bb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512021000600301
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisorsDental estheticsSmileOrthodonticsABSTRACT Introduction: The vertical position of orthodontic brackets in maxillary incisors may influence the incisal step between the anterior teeth and thereby interfere with the smile esthetics. Even so, esthetic standards have been modified over time and consistently required technical adjustments. Objective: This study analyzed orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary central incisors (MCI) and maxillary lateral incisors (MLI), and further determined whether the orthodontist sex, age and time of specialization have association to their choices. Methods: This study collected data through an electronic form. Study participants analyzed a clinical case in which they indicated their preference for bracket bonding height. The placement height options ranged from 3.0 mm to 5.5 mm from the incisal edge, with 0.5-mm intervals, or at the clinical crown center (CCC). The difference in the bonding height between the MCI and MLI was analyzed, considering the formation of incisal steps between these teeth. Results: Participants indicated that the difference in bracket bonding height between the MCI and MLI should be as follows: 0 mm (3.9%); 0.5 mm (78.3%); 1 mm (7.6%); 1.5 mm (0.2%); and CCC (9.9%). There was no statistically significant correlation between the choice for bracket bonding height and sex, age and time since specialization. Conclusion: Most participating orthodontists choose the 0.5-mm difference in bracket placement height between the MCI and MLI. The variables sex, age and time since specialization did not influence this choice.Dental Press International2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000600301Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.26 n.6 2021reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212031.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique AndradeBRANDÃO,Karla Magnólia NapoliMENEZES,Carolina Carmo deMACHADO,André WilsonSANTAMARIA-JR,Miltoneng2021-12-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512021000600301Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2021-12-13T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors
title Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors
spellingShingle Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors
NASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique Andrade
Dental esthetics
Smile
Orthodontics
title_short Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors
title_full Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors
title_fullStr Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors
title_full_unstemmed Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors
title_sort Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors
author NASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique Andrade
author_facet NASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique Andrade
BRANDÃO,Karla Magnólia Napoli
MENEZES,Carolina Carmo de
MACHADO,André Wilson
SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton
author_role author
author2 BRANDÃO,Karla Magnólia Napoli
MENEZES,Carolina Carmo de
MACHADO,André Wilson
SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv NASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique Andrade
BRANDÃO,Karla Magnólia Napoli
MENEZES,Carolina Carmo de
MACHADO,André Wilson
SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental esthetics
Smile
Orthodontics
topic Dental esthetics
Smile
Orthodontics
description ABSTRACT Introduction: The vertical position of orthodontic brackets in maxillary incisors may influence the incisal step between the anterior teeth and thereby interfere with the smile esthetics. Even so, esthetic standards have been modified over time and consistently required technical adjustments. Objective: This study analyzed orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary central incisors (MCI) and maxillary lateral incisors (MLI), and further determined whether the orthodontist sex, age and time of specialization have association to their choices. Methods: This study collected data through an electronic form. Study participants analyzed a clinical case in which they indicated their preference for bracket bonding height. The placement height options ranged from 3.0 mm to 5.5 mm from the incisal edge, with 0.5-mm intervals, or at the clinical crown center (CCC). The difference in the bonding height between the MCI and MLI was analyzed, considering the formation of incisal steps between these teeth. Results: Participants indicated that the difference in bracket bonding height between the MCI and MLI should be as follows: 0 mm (3.9%); 0.5 mm (78.3%); 1 mm (7.6%); 1.5 mm (0.2%); and CCC (9.9%). There was no statistically significant correlation between the choice for bracket bonding height and sex, age and time since specialization. Conclusion: Most participating orthodontists choose the 0.5-mm difference in bracket placement height between the MCI and MLI. The variables sex, age and time since specialization did not influence this choice.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000600301
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000600301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212031.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.26 n.6 2021
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122398978801664