Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000600301 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Introduction: The vertical position of orthodontic brackets in maxillary incisors may influence the incisal step between the anterior teeth and thereby interfere with the smile esthetics. Even so, esthetic standards have been modified over time and consistently required technical adjustments. Objective: This study analyzed orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary central incisors (MCI) and maxillary lateral incisors (MLI), and further determined whether the orthodontist sex, age and time of specialization have association to their choices. Methods: This study collected data through an electronic form. Study participants analyzed a clinical case in which they indicated their preference for bracket bonding height. The placement height options ranged from 3.0 mm to 5.5 mm from the incisal edge, with 0.5-mm intervals, or at the clinical crown center (CCC). The difference in the bonding height between the MCI and MLI was analyzed, considering the formation of incisal steps between these teeth. Results: Participants indicated that the difference in bracket bonding height between the MCI and MLI should be as follows: 0 mm (3.9%); 0.5 mm (78.3%); 1 mm (7.6%); 1.5 mm (0.2%); and CCC (9.9%). There was no statistically significant correlation between the choice for bracket bonding height and sex, age and time since specialization. Conclusion: Most participating orthodontists choose the 0.5-mm difference in bracket placement height between the MCI and MLI. The variables sex, age and time since specialization did not influence this choice. |
id |
DPI-1_cad223b502bba90d81b1260f072f11bb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512021000600301 |
network_acronym_str |
DPI-1 |
network_name_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisorsDental estheticsSmileOrthodonticsABSTRACT Introduction: The vertical position of orthodontic brackets in maxillary incisors may influence the incisal step between the anterior teeth and thereby interfere with the smile esthetics. Even so, esthetic standards have been modified over time and consistently required technical adjustments. Objective: This study analyzed orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary central incisors (MCI) and maxillary lateral incisors (MLI), and further determined whether the orthodontist sex, age and time of specialization have association to their choices. Methods: This study collected data through an electronic form. Study participants analyzed a clinical case in which they indicated their preference for bracket bonding height. The placement height options ranged from 3.0 mm to 5.5 mm from the incisal edge, with 0.5-mm intervals, or at the clinical crown center (CCC). The difference in the bonding height between the MCI and MLI was analyzed, considering the formation of incisal steps between these teeth. Results: Participants indicated that the difference in bracket bonding height between the MCI and MLI should be as follows: 0 mm (3.9%); 0.5 mm (78.3%); 1 mm (7.6%); 1.5 mm (0.2%); and CCC (9.9%). There was no statistically significant correlation between the choice for bracket bonding height and sex, age and time since specialization. Conclusion: Most participating orthodontists choose the 0.5-mm difference in bracket placement height between the MCI and MLI. The variables sex, age and time since specialization did not influence this choice.Dental Press International2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000600301Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.26 n.6 2021reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212031.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique AndradeBRANDÃO,Karla Magnólia NapoliMENEZES,Carolina Carmo deMACHADO,André WilsonSANTAMARIA-JR,Miltoneng2021-12-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512021000600301Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2021-12-13T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors |
title |
Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors |
spellingShingle |
Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors NASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique Andrade Dental esthetics Smile Orthodontics |
title_short |
Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors |
title_full |
Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors |
title_fullStr |
Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors |
title_sort |
Orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary incisors |
author |
NASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique Andrade |
author_facet |
NASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique Andrade BRANDÃO,Karla Magnólia Napoli MENEZES,Carolina Carmo de MACHADO,André Wilson SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
BRANDÃO,Karla Magnólia Napoli MENEZES,Carolina Carmo de MACHADO,André Wilson SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
NASCIMENTO,Mauro Henrique Andrade BRANDÃO,Karla Magnólia Napoli MENEZES,Carolina Carmo de MACHADO,André Wilson SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental esthetics Smile Orthodontics |
topic |
Dental esthetics Smile Orthodontics |
description |
ABSTRACT Introduction: The vertical position of orthodontic brackets in maxillary incisors may influence the incisal step between the anterior teeth and thereby interfere with the smile esthetics. Even so, esthetic standards have been modified over time and consistently required technical adjustments. Objective: This study analyzed orthodontists’ preferences regarding the difference of bracket bonding height between the maxillary central incisors (MCI) and maxillary lateral incisors (MLI), and further determined whether the orthodontist sex, age and time of specialization have association to their choices. Methods: This study collected data through an electronic form. Study participants analyzed a clinical case in which they indicated their preference for bracket bonding height. The placement height options ranged from 3.0 mm to 5.5 mm from the incisal edge, with 0.5-mm intervals, or at the clinical crown center (CCC). The difference in the bonding height between the MCI and MLI was analyzed, considering the formation of incisal steps between these teeth. Results: Participants indicated that the difference in bracket bonding height between the MCI and MLI should be as follows: 0 mm (3.9%); 0.5 mm (78.3%); 1 mm (7.6%); 1.5 mm (0.2%); and CCC (9.9%). There was no statistically significant correlation between the choice for bracket bonding height and sex, age and time since specialization. Conclusion: Most participating orthodontists choose the 0.5-mm difference in bracket placement height between the MCI and MLI. The variables sex, age and time since specialization did not influence this choice. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000600301 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000600301 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212031.oar |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.26 n.6 2021 reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics instname:Dental Press International (DPI) instacron:DPI |
instname_str |
Dental Press International (DPI) |
instacron_str |
DPI |
institution |
DPI |
reponame_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
collection |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1754122398978801664 |