Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira,Larissa A.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Sapata,Diogo M., Provenzano,Maria G. A., Hayacibara,Roberto M., Ramos,Adilson L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000300064
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: bonded fixed retainers are often used to stabilize the results obtained with the orthodontic treatment. It is important that they do not prejudice dental health, as they will be used for a long period. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare periodontal indexes between two types of bonded fixed retainers, conventional 3 x 3 plain retainer (0.8-mm orthodontic wire, bonded to the canines only) and a manufactured braided retainer (0.2 x 0.7-mm stainless steel wire, bonded to all anterior teeth) after use. Methods: a test group of 15 volunteers (aged from 18 to 25 years) used both the conventional retainer and braided retainer for six months. A randomized longitudinal study design, with a two week washout interval, was applied. The dental plaque index, gingival index and dental calculus index were evaluated. Furthermore, the calculus accumulated along the retainer wire was measured and all patients answered a questionnaire about the use, acceptance and comfort of both types of retainers. Results: the scores for plaque and gingival indexes were higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05) on the lingual and proximal surfaces. The same occurred with the calculus index on the lingual surfaces (p< 0.05). The calculus index along wire was higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05). All patients preferred the conventional retainer, and said that it was also more comfortable to use. Conclusion: it was concluded that the conventional retainer showed better periodontal indexes than the braided type.
id DPI-1_cff0653015f8d795edbdf68fc5a1fe3a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512019000300064
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal studyOrthodontic retainersGingivitisOrthodontics, correctivePeriodonticsABSTRACT Introduction: bonded fixed retainers are often used to stabilize the results obtained with the orthodontic treatment. It is important that they do not prejudice dental health, as they will be used for a long period. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare periodontal indexes between two types of bonded fixed retainers, conventional 3 x 3 plain retainer (0.8-mm orthodontic wire, bonded to the canines only) and a manufactured braided retainer (0.2 x 0.7-mm stainless steel wire, bonded to all anterior teeth) after use. Methods: a test group of 15 volunteers (aged from 18 to 25 years) used both the conventional retainer and braided retainer for six months. A randomized longitudinal study design, with a two week washout interval, was applied. The dental plaque index, gingival index and dental calculus index were evaluated. Furthermore, the calculus accumulated along the retainer wire was measured and all patients answered a questionnaire about the use, acceptance and comfort of both types of retainers. Results: the scores for plaque and gingival indexes were higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05) on the lingual and proximal surfaces. The same occurred with the calculus index on the lingual surfaces (p< 0.05). The calculus index along wire was higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05). All patients preferred the conventional retainer, and said that it was also more comfortable to use. Conclusion: it was concluded that the conventional retainer showed better periodontal indexes than the braided type.Dental Press International2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000300064Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.24 n.3 2019reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.064-070.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira,Larissa A.Sapata,Diogo M.Provenzano,Maria G. A.Hayacibara,Roberto M.Ramos,Adilson L.eng2019-07-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512019000300064Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2019-07-26T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study
title Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study
spellingShingle Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study
Ferreira,Larissa A.
Orthodontic retainers
Gingivitis
Orthodontics, corrective
Periodontics
title_short Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study
title_full Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study
title_fullStr Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study
title_full_unstemmed Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study
title_sort Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study
author Ferreira,Larissa A.
author_facet Ferreira,Larissa A.
Sapata,Diogo M.
Provenzano,Maria G. A.
Hayacibara,Roberto M.
Ramos,Adilson L.
author_role author
author2 Sapata,Diogo M.
Provenzano,Maria G. A.
Hayacibara,Roberto M.
Ramos,Adilson L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira,Larissa A.
Sapata,Diogo M.
Provenzano,Maria G. A.
Hayacibara,Roberto M.
Ramos,Adilson L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontic retainers
Gingivitis
Orthodontics, corrective
Periodontics
topic Orthodontic retainers
Gingivitis
Orthodontics, corrective
Periodontics
description ABSTRACT Introduction: bonded fixed retainers are often used to stabilize the results obtained with the orthodontic treatment. It is important that they do not prejudice dental health, as they will be used for a long period. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare periodontal indexes between two types of bonded fixed retainers, conventional 3 x 3 plain retainer (0.8-mm orthodontic wire, bonded to the canines only) and a manufactured braided retainer (0.2 x 0.7-mm stainless steel wire, bonded to all anterior teeth) after use. Methods: a test group of 15 volunteers (aged from 18 to 25 years) used both the conventional retainer and braided retainer for six months. A randomized longitudinal study design, with a two week washout interval, was applied. The dental plaque index, gingival index and dental calculus index were evaluated. Furthermore, the calculus accumulated along the retainer wire was measured and all patients answered a questionnaire about the use, acceptance and comfort of both types of retainers. Results: the scores for plaque and gingival indexes were higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05) on the lingual and proximal surfaces. The same occurred with the calculus index on the lingual surfaces (p< 0.05). The calculus index along wire was higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05). All patients preferred the conventional retainer, and said that it was also more comfortable to use. Conclusion: it was concluded that the conventional retainer showed better periodontal indexes than the braided type.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000300064
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000300064
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.064-070.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.24 n.3 2019
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122398460805120