Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvajal-Flórez,Alvaro
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Barbosa-Lis,Diana María, Zapata-Noreña,Oscar Arturo, Marín-Velásquez,Julissa Andrea, Afanador-Bayona,Sergio Andrés
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000200088
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the results of a finishing protocol implemented in patients treated in the Orthodontics graduate program at Universidad de Antioquia. Evaluation was carried out by means of the criteria set by the Objective Grading System (OGS) of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO). Methods: Cast models and panoramic radiographs of 34 patients were evaluated. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 17 patients (19.88 ± 4.4 years old) treated under a finishing protocol. This protocol included training in finishing, application of a finishing guide, brackets repositioning and patient's follow-up. Results of the IG were compared to a control group of 17 patients (21.88 ± 7.0 years old) selected by stratified randomization without finishing intervention (CG). Results: The scores for both CG and IG were 38.00 ± 9.0 and 31.41 ± 9.6 (p = 0.048), respectively. The score improved significantly in the IG group, mainly regarding marginal ridges (CG: 5.59 ± 2.2; IG: 3.65 ± 1.8) (p = 0.009) and root angulation (CG: 7.59 ± 2.8; IG: 4.88 ± 2.6) (p = 0.007). Criteria that did not improve, but had the highest scores were: alignment (CG: 6.35 ± 2.7; IG: 6.82 ± 2.8) (p = 0.62) and buccolingual inclination (CG: 3.6 ± 5.88; IG: 5.29 ± 3.9) (p = 0.65). Conclusions: Standardization and implementation of a finishing protocol contributed to improve clinical performance in the Orthodontics graduate program, as expressed by occlusal outcomes. Greater emphasis should be given on the finishing phase to achieve lower scores in the ABO grading system.
id DPI-1_d4160ec44be212c80e2a9c6202e86a0a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512016000200088
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocolTreatment outcomesIndex of Orthodontic Treatment NeedMalocclusionClinical protocols.ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the results of a finishing protocol implemented in patients treated in the Orthodontics graduate program at Universidad de Antioquia. Evaluation was carried out by means of the criteria set by the Objective Grading System (OGS) of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO). Methods: Cast models and panoramic radiographs of 34 patients were evaluated. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 17 patients (19.88 ± 4.4 years old) treated under a finishing protocol. This protocol included training in finishing, application of a finishing guide, brackets repositioning and patient's follow-up. Results of the IG were compared to a control group of 17 patients (21.88 ± 7.0 years old) selected by stratified randomization without finishing intervention (CG). Results: The scores for both CG and IG were 38.00 ± 9.0 and 31.41 ± 9.6 (p = 0.048), respectively. The score improved significantly in the IG group, mainly regarding marginal ridges (CG: 5.59 ± 2.2; IG: 3.65 ± 1.8) (p = 0.009) and root angulation (CG: 7.59 ± 2.8; IG: 4.88 ± 2.6) (p = 0.007). Criteria that did not improve, but had the highest scores were: alignment (CG: 6.35 ± 2.7; IG: 6.82 ± 2.8) (p = 0.62) and buccolingual inclination (CG: 3.6 ± 5.88; IG: 5.29 ± 3.9) (p = 0.65). Conclusions: Standardization and implementation of a finishing protocol contributed to improve clinical performance in the Orthodontics graduate program, as expressed by occlusal outcomes. Greater emphasis should be given on the finishing phase to achieve lower scores in the ABO grading system.Dental Press International2016-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000200088Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.2 2016reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.088-094.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvajal-Flórez,AlvaroBarbosa-Lis,Diana MaríaZapata-Noreña,Oscar ArturoMarín-Velásquez,Julissa AndreaAfanador-Bayona,Sergio Andréseng2016-10-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512016000200088Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2016-10-13T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
spellingShingle Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
Carvajal-Flórez,Alvaro
Treatment outcomes
Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need
Malocclusion
Clinical protocols.
title_short Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title_full Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title_fullStr Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title_full_unstemmed Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
title_sort Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol
author Carvajal-Flórez,Alvaro
author_facet Carvajal-Flórez,Alvaro
Barbosa-Lis,Diana María
Zapata-Noreña,Oscar Arturo
Marín-Velásquez,Julissa Andrea
Afanador-Bayona,Sergio Andrés
author_role author
author2 Barbosa-Lis,Diana María
Zapata-Noreña,Oscar Arturo
Marín-Velásquez,Julissa Andrea
Afanador-Bayona,Sergio Andrés
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvajal-Flórez,Alvaro
Barbosa-Lis,Diana María
Zapata-Noreña,Oscar Arturo
Marín-Velásquez,Julissa Andrea
Afanador-Bayona,Sergio Andrés
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Treatment outcomes
Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need
Malocclusion
Clinical protocols.
topic Treatment outcomes
Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need
Malocclusion
Clinical protocols.
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the results of a finishing protocol implemented in patients treated in the Orthodontics graduate program at Universidad de Antioquia. Evaluation was carried out by means of the criteria set by the Objective Grading System (OGS) of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO). Methods: Cast models and panoramic radiographs of 34 patients were evaluated. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 17 patients (19.88 ± 4.4 years old) treated under a finishing protocol. This protocol included training in finishing, application of a finishing guide, brackets repositioning and patient's follow-up. Results of the IG were compared to a control group of 17 patients (21.88 ± 7.0 years old) selected by stratified randomization without finishing intervention (CG). Results: The scores for both CG and IG were 38.00 ± 9.0 and 31.41 ± 9.6 (p = 0.048), respectively. The score improved significantly in the IG group, mainly regarding marginal ridges (CG: 5.59 ± 2.2; IG: 3.65 ± 1.8) (p = 0.009) and root angulation (CG: 7.59 ± 2.8; IG: 4.88 ± 2.6) (p = 0.007). Criteria that did not improve, but had the highest scores were: alignment (CG: 6.35 ± 2.7; IG: 6.82 ± 2.8) (p = 0.62) and buccolingual inclination (CG: 3.6 ± 5.88; IG: 5.29 ± 3.9) (p = 0.65). Conclusions: Standardization and implementation of a finishing protocol contributed to improve clinical performance in the Orthodontics graduate program, as expressed by occlusal outcomes. Greater emphasis should be given on the finishing phase to achieve lower scores in the ABO grading system.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000200088
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000200088
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.088-094.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.2 2016
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122397627187200