Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nomura,Suzy
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore, Silva,Paula Patrícia Cotrin da, Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli, Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont, Freitas,Marcos Roberto de, Oliveira,Renata Cristina Gobbi de, Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500047
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the smile attractiveness of different gingival zeniths by general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons and the esthetic perception in the symmetric and asymmetric changes in gingival zeniths. Methods: Posed photographs of five patients were taken and digitally manipulated in Keynote software, in the gingival zenith region, in increments of 0.5 to 1mm in maxillary central and lateral incisors, symmetrically and asymmetrically, in nine different ways for each patient. The photos were then uploaded to a website, where evaluators (general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons) could observe and vote according to their esthetic perception, scoring from 1 to 10, 1 being the least attractive and 10 the more attractive. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison. Results: Asymmetric gingival zeniths were less attractive than symmetrical gingival zeniths; gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm were perceptible in the smile attractiveness, both by laypersons, general dentists and orthodontists. When comparing maxillary central incisors with maxillary lateral incisors, the aesthetic change performed in the central incisors are more perceptible than those performed in lateral incisors, both symmetrical and asymmetrical. In a general way, orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in the evaluation and perception of gingival zenith changes, with the laypersons perceiving this change only from 1mm of maxillary right central incisor asymmetrical change. Conclusions: Asymmetric gingival zeniths are less attractive than symmetrical ones. Gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm are perceptible in the smile attractiveness. Orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in evaluating smile esthetics.
id DPI-1_df152b06bc15cd8c93b131cb286f9499
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512018000500047
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile estheticsSmileGingival zenithEstheticsAttractivenessABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the smile attractiveness of different gingival zeniths by general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons and the esthetic perception in the symmetric and asymmetric changes in gingival zeniths. Methods: Posed photographs of five patients were taken and digitally manipulated in Keynote software, in the gingival zenith region, in increments of 0.5 to 1mm in maxillary central and lateral incisors, symmetrically and asymmetrically, in nine different ways for each patient. The photos were then uploaded to a website, where evaluators (general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons) could observe and vote according to their esthetic perception, scoring from 1 to 10, 1 being the least attractive and 10 the more attractive. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison. Results: Asymmetric gingival zeniths were less attractive than symmetrical gingival zeniths; gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm were perceptible in the smile attractiveness, both by laypersons, general dentists and orthodontists. When comparing maxillary central incisors with maxillary lateral incisors, the aesthetic change performed in the central incisors are more perceptible than those performed in lateral incisors, both symmetrical and asymmetrical. In a general way, orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in the evaluation and perception of gingival zenith changes, with the laypersons perceiving this change only from 1mm of maxillary right central incisor asymmetrical change. Conclusions: Asymmetric gingival zeniths are less attractive than symmetrical ones. Gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm are perceptible in the smile attractiveness. Orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in evaluating smile esthetics.Dental Press International2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500047Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.23 n.5 2018reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.23.5.047-057.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNomura,SuzyFreitas,Karina Maria SalvatoreSilva,Paula Patrícia Cotrin daValarelli,Fabricio PinelliCançado,Rodrigo HermontFreitas,Marcos Roberto deOliveira,Renata Cristina Gobbi deOliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi deeng2018-11-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512018000500047Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2018-11-01T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics
title Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics
spellingShingle Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics
Nomura,Suzy
Smile
Gingival zenith
Esthetics
Attractiveness
title_short Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics
title_full Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics
title_fullStr Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics
title_sort Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics
author Nomura,Suzy
author_facet Nomura,Suzy
Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore
Silva,Paula Patrícia Cotrin da
Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli
Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont
Freitas,Marcos Roberto de
Oliveira,Renata Cristina Gobbi de
Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de
author_role author
author2 Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore
Silva,Paula Patrícia Cotrin da
Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli
Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont
Freitas,Marcos Roberto de
Oliveira,Renata Cristina Gobbi de
Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nomura,Suzy
Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore
Silva,Paula Patrícia Cotrin da
Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli
Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont
Freitas,Marcos Roberto de
Oliveira,Renata Cristina Gobbi de
Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Smile
Gingival zenith
Esthetics
Attractiveness
topic Smile
Gingival zenith
Esthetics
Attractiveness
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the smile attractiveness of different gingival zeniths by general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons and the esthetic perception in the symmetric and asymmetric changes in gingival zeniths. Methods: Posed photographs of five patients were taken and digitally manipulated in Keynote software, in the gingival zenith region, in increments of 0.5 to 1mm in maxillary central and lateral incisors, symmetrically and asymmetrically, in nine different ways for each patient. The photos were then uploaded to a website, where evaluators (general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons) could observe and vote according to their esthetic perception, scoring from 1 to 10, 1 being the least attractive and 10 the more attractive. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison. Results: Asymmetric gingival zeniths were less attractive than symmetrical gingival zeniths; gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm were perceptible in the smile attractiveness, both by laypersons, general dentists and orthodontists. When comparing maxillary central incisors with maxillary lateral incisors, the aesthetic change performed in the central incisors are more perceptible than those performed in lateral incisors, both symmetrical and asymmetrical. In a general way, orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in the evaluation and perception of gingival zenith changes, with the laypersons perceiving this change only from 1mm of maxillary right central incisor asymmetrical change. Conclusions: Asymmetric gingival zeniths are less attractive than symmetrical ones. Gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm are perceptible in the smile attractiveness. Orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in evaluating smile esthetics.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500047
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500047
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.23.5.047-057.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.23 n.5 2018
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122398131552256