Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600013 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stability of bimaxillary surgery in patients with skeletal malocclusion, with the use of rigid internal fixation. METHODS: Lateral cephalograms from 20 patients, 11 males and 9 females, mean age of 26 years and 1 month, were evaluated before surgery, immediately post-operative and at least 6 months after surgery. Nineteen cephalometric measurements were evaluated, and the results were statistically analyzed by means of the Student's t test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The Le Fort I maxillary advancement surgery showed almost no relapse. There was lack of stability of mandibular setback, with relapse of 37.33% on point B, due to counterclockwise rotation of the mandible between post-operative periods, occurred by better intercuspation after surgery and muscle adaptation. The results showed the same tendencies for both genders. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that on the bimaxillary surgery treatment of Class III malocclusion, the maxillary surgery was very stable, but the mandibular setback recurred. No statistical differences were found in surgical stability between genders. |
id |
DPI-1_f1305a1f4b267eff444c425d370baab5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512012000600013 |
network_acronym_str |
DPI-1 |
network_name_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatmentAngle Class III malocclusionOsteotomyLe Fort osteotomyOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stability of bimaxillary surgery in patients with skeletal malocclusion, with the use of rigid internal fixation. METHODS: Lateral cephalograms from 20 patients, 11 males and 9 females, mean age of 26 years and 1 month, were evaluated before surgery, immediately post-operative and at least 6 months after surgery. Nineteen cephalometric measurements were evaluated, and the results were statistically analyzed by means of the Student's t test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The Le Fort I maxillary advancement surgery showed almost no relapse. There was lack of stability of mandibular setback, with relapse of 37.33% on point B, due to counterclockwise rotation of the mandible between post-operative periods, occurred by better intercuspation after surgery and muscle adaptation. The results showed the same tendencies for both genders. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that on the bimaxillary surgery treatment of Class III malocclusion, the maxillary surgery was very stable, but the mandibular setback recurred. No statistical differences were found in surgical stability between genders.Dental Press International2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600013Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.6 2012reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/S2176-94512012000600013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves,Fernando AntonioSiqueira,Vânia Célia Vieira deeng2013-03-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512012000600013Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2013-03-27T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment |
title |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment |
spellingShingle |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment Gonçalves,Fernando Antonio Angle Class III malocclusion Osteotomy Le Fort osteotomy |
title_short |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment |
title_full |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment |
title_fullStr |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment |
title_sort |
Stability of bimaxillary surgery on Class III malocclusion treatment |
author |
Gonçalves,Fernando Antonio |
author_facet |
Gonçalves,Fernando Antonio Siqueira,Vânia Célia Vieira de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Siqueira,Vânia Célia Vieira de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves,Fernando Antonio Siqueira,Vânia Célia Vieira de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Angle Class III malocclusion Osteotomy Le Fort osteotomy |
topic |
Angle Class III malocclusion Osteotomy Le Fort osteotomy |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stability of bimaxillary surgery in patients with skeletal malocclusion, with the use of rigid internal fixation. METHODS: Lateral cephalograms from 20 patients, 11 males and 9 females, mean age of 26 years and 1 month, were evaluated before surgery, immediately post-operative and at least 6 months after surgery. Nineteen cephalometric measurements were evaluated, and the results were statistically analyzed by means of the Student's t test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The Le Fort I maxillary advancement surgery showed almost no relapse. There was lack of stability of mandibular setback, with relapse of 37.33% on point B, due to counterclockwise rotation of the mandible between post-operative periods, occurred by better intercuspation after surgery and muscle adaptation. The results showed the same tendencies for both genders. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that on the bimaxillary surgery treatment of Class III malocclusion, the maxillary surgery was very stable, but the mandibular setback recurred. No statistical differences were found in surgical stability between genders. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600013 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000600013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S2176-94512012000600013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.6 2012 reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics instname:Dental Press International (DPI) instacron:DPI |
instname_str |
Dental Press International (DPI) |
instacron_str |
DPI |
institution |
DPI |
reponame_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
collection |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1754122396333244416 |