Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Patel,Mayara Paim
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Henriques,José Fernando Castanha, Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore de, Grec,Roberto Henrique da Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000300044
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to cephalometrically assess the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Class II malocclusion treatment performed with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances. METHODS: The sample comprised 25 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances, at a mean initial age of 12.90 years old. The mean time of the entire orthodontic treatment was 3.89 years. The distalization phase lasted for 0.85 years, after which the fixed appliance was used for 3.04 years. Cephalograms were used at initial (T1), post-distalization (T2) and final phases of treatment (T3). For intragroup comparison of the three phases evaluated, dependent ANOVA and Tukey tests were used. RESULTS: Jones Jig appliance did not interfere in the maxillary and mandibular component and did not change maxillomandibular relationship. Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss, mesialization and significant extrusion of first and second premolars, as well as a significant increase in anterior face height at the end of treatment. The majority of adverse effects that occur during intraoral distalization are subsequently corrected during corrective mechanics. Buccal inclination and protrusion of mandibular incisors were identified. By the end of treatment, correction of overjet and overbite was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss represented by significant mesial movement and extrusion of first and second premolars, in addition to a significant increase in anterior face height.
id DPI-1_fa64a890a44d3d5b6ccb4994df6bd8e3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512014000300044
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatmentMalocclusionAngle Class IICorrective OrthodonticsTooth movement OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to cephalometrically assess the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Class II malocclusion treatment performed with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances. METHODS: The sample comprised 25 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances, at a mean initial age of 12.90 years old. The mean time of the entire orthodontic treatment was 3.89 years. The distalization phase lasted for 0.85 years, after which the fixed appliance was used for 3.04 years. Cephalograms were used at initial (T1), post-distalization (T2) and final phases of treatment (T3). For intragroup comparison of the three phases evaluated, dependent ANOVA and Tukey tests were used. RESULTS: Jones Jig appliance did not interfere in the maxillary and mandibular component and did not change maxillomandibular relationship. Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss, mesialization and significant extrusion of first and second premolars, as well as a significant increase in anterior face height at the end of treatment. The majority of adverse effects that occur during intraoral distalization are subsequently corrected during corrective mechanics. Buccal inclination and protrusion of mandibular incisors were identified. By the end of treatment, correction of overjet and overbite was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss represented by significant mesial movement and extrusion of first and second premolars, in addition to a significant increase in anterior face height. Dental Press International2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000300044Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.19 n.3 2014reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.044-051.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPatel,Mayara PaimHenriques,José Fernando CastanhaFreitas,Karina Maria Salvatore deGrec,Roberto Henrique da Costaeng2015-08-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512014000300044Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2015-08-24T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
spellingShingle Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
Patel,Mayara Paim
Malocclusion
Angle Class II
Corrective Orthodontics
Tooth movement
title_short Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title_full Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title_fullStr Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title_full_unstemmed Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title_sort Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
author Patel,Mayara Paim
author_facet Patel,Mayara Paim
Henriques,José Fernando Castanha
Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore de
Grec,Roberto Henrique da Costa
author_role author
author2 Henriques,José Fernando Castanha
Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore de
Grec,Roberto Henrique da Costa
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Patel,Mayara Paim
Henriques,José Fernando Castanha
Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore de
Grec,Roberto Henrique da Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Malocclusion
Angle Class II
Corrective Orthodontics
Tooth movement
topic Malocclusion
Angle Class II
Corrective Orthodontics
Tooth movement
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to cephalometrically assess the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Class II malocclusion treatment performed with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances. METHODS: The sample comprised 25 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances, at a mean initial age of 12.90 years old. The mean time of the entire orthodontic treatment was 3.89 years. The distalization phase lasted for 0.85 years, after which the fixed appliance was used for 3.04 years. Cephalograms were used at initial (T1), post-distalization (T2) and final phases of treatment (T3). For intragroup comparison of the three phases evaluated, dependent ANOVA and Tukey tests were used. RESULTS: Jones Jig appliance did not interfere in the maxillary and mandibular component and did not change maxillomandibular relationship. Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss, mesialization and significant extrusion of first and second premolars, as well as a significant increase in anterior face height at the end of treatment. The majority of adverse effects that occur during intraoral distalization are subsequently corrected during corrective mechanics. Buccal inclination and protrusion of mandibular incisors were identified. By the end of treatment, correction of overjet and overbite was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss represented by significant mesial movement and extrusion of first and second premolars, in addition to a significant increase in anterior face height.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000300044
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000300044
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.044-051.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.19 n.3 2014
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122396854386688