Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chae,Jong-Moon
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500023
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Patients with dental Class II bialveolar protrusion are generally treated by extracting the four first premolars or two first and two second premolars, and retracting the anterior teeth. This case report describes the treatment of an adult patient with bialveolar protrusion, a Class II canine and molar relationship, and lip protrusion. METHODS: In this patient, the maxillary right second molar (1.7) had to be extracted due to extensive caries. To create sufficient space to retract the anterior teeth, the maxillary right posterior teeth were distalized with a maxillary posterior mini-implant (1.2~1.3 mm in diameter, 10 mm long), which was placed into the maxillary tuberosity area and allowed an en masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth. RESULTS: Overall, mini-implant can provide anchorage to produce a good facial profile even without additional premolar extraction in cases of dental Class II bialveolar protrusion with the hopeless second molar. CONCLUSION: The total treatment period was 42 months and the results were acceptable for 34 months after debonding.
id DPI-1_fd9bc0a77e900873117302b1ad3d1564
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512012000500023
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implantMini-implantTooth extractionTooth movementINTRODUCTION: Patients with dental Class II bialveolar protrusion are generally treated by extracting the four first premolars or two first and two second premolars, and retracting the anterior teeth. This case report describes the treatment of an adult patient with bialveolar protrusion, a Class II canine and molar relationship, and lip protrusion. METHODS: In this patient, the maxillary right second molar (1.7) had to be extracted due to extensive caries. To create sufficient space to retract the anterior teeth, the maxillary right posterior teeth were distalized with a maxillary posterior mini-implant (1.2~1.3 mm in diameter, 10 mm long), which was placed into the maxillary tuberosity area and allowed an en masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth. RESULTS: Overall, mini-implant can provide anchorage to produce a good facial profile even without additional premolar extraction in cases of dental Class II bialveolar protrusion with the hopeless second molar. CONCLUSION: The total treatment period was 42 months and the results were acceptable for 34 months after debonding.Dental Press International2012-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500023Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.5 2012reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/S2176-94512012000500023info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChae,Jong-Mooneng2012-11-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512012000500023Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2012-11-27T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant
title Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant
spellingShingle Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant
Chae,Jong-Moon
Mini-implant
Tooth extraction
Tooth movement
title_short Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant
title_full Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant
title_fullStr Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant
title_sort Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant
author Chae,Jong-Moon
author_facet Chae,Jong-Moon
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chae,Jong-Moon
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mini-implant
Tooth extraction
Tooth movement
topic Mini-implant
Tooth extraction
Tooth movement
description INTRODUCTION: Patients with dental Class II bialveolar protrusion are generally treated by extracting the four first premolars or two first and two second premolars, and retracting the anterior teeth. This case report describes the treatment of an adult patient with bialveolar protrusion, a Class II canine and molar relationship, and lip protrusion. METHODS: In this patient, the maxillary right second molar (1.7) had to be extracted due to extensive caries. To create sufficient space to retract the anterior teeth, the maxillary right posterior teeth were distalized with a maxillary posterior mini-implant (1.2~1.3 mm in diameter, 10 mm long), which was placed into the maxillary tuberosity area and allowed an en masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth. RESULTS: Overall, mini-implant can provide anchorage to produce a good facial profile even without additional premolar extraction in cases of dental Class II bialveolar protrusion with the hopeless second molar. CONCLUSION: The total treatment period was 42 months and the results were acceptable for 34 months after debonding.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500023
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500023
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2176-94512012000500023
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.5 2012
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122396314370048