When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accused
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/206 |
Resumo: | This paper came from the purpose of articulating the conventional fundamentality of the right of being properly accused, qualified as a guarantee by art. 8.2 of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights, with the punitive character of the accusatory claim developed in disagreement with the international and national normative frameworks. For this purpose, the analytical dichotomy of “accusing” and “punishing” was first segmented (1) in the investigation, on the one hand, of the (1.1) international and national normative frameworks that make up the right of being properly accused, with special emphasis on the Pact of San José of Costa Rica and the Federal Constitution of 1988; on the other, on (1.2) the most concrete marks that outline the dogmatic profile of the judicial control of the accusatory pretension in Brazilian criminal procedural law. In the second part (2), the narrative acquires more pragmatic traits tending to unfold the explanatory potential of the effective punishment implemented by the Judiciary, emphasizing (2.1) the superior epistemological attributes of the contrast between the theoretical premises of the first part with the analysis of concrete cases, (2.2) highlighting the example of criminal liability that is commonly attributed to public managers according to an objective pattern. |
id |
DPU_d60223df6072eb0bc786a6c2fc984b07 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/206 |
network_acronym_str |
DPU |
network_name_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accusedCuando acusar es castigar: quincuagésimo aniversario del derecho convencional a ser bien acusadoQuando acusar é punir: quinquagésimo aniversário do direito convencional a ser bem acusadoProceso penal. Acusación. Garantías. CADH. Gestores públicos.Processo penal. Acusação. Garantias. CADH. Gestores públicos.Criminal proceedingsAccusationGuaranteesCADHPublic managersThis paper came from the purpose of articulating the conventional fundamentality of the right of being properly accused, qualified as a guarantee by art. 8.2 of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights, with the punitive character of the accusatory claim developed in disagreement with the international and national normative frameworks. For this purpose, the analytical dichotomy of “accusing” and “punishing” was first segmented (1) in the investigation, on the one hand, of the (1.1) international and national normative frameworks that make up the right of being properly accused, with special emphasis on the Pact of San José of Costa Rica and the Federal Constitution of 1988; on the other, on (1.2) the most concrete marks that outline the dogmatic profile of the judicial control of the accusatory pretension in Brazilian criminal procedural law. In the second part (2), the narrative acquires more pragmatic traits tending to unfold the explanatory potential of the effective punishment implemented by the Judiciary, emphasizing (2.1) the superior epistemological attributes of the contrast between the theoretical premises of the first part with the analysis of concrete cases, (2.2) highlighting the example of criminal liability that is commonly attributed to public managers according to an objective pattern.Este artículo nace del propósito de articular la fundamentalidad convencional del derecho a ser bien acusado, calificado como garantía por el artículo 8.2 de la quincuagésima Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos, con el carácter autónomamente punitivo de la pretensión acusatoria desarrollada al margen de los marcos normativos internacionales y nacionales. Para ello, se segmentó la dicotomía analítica del "acusar" y del "castigar", en un primer momento (1), en la investigación, por una parte, sobre los (1.1) marcos normativos internacionales y nacionales que conforman el derecho a ser bien acusado, con especial énfasis en el Pacto de San José de Costa Rica y en la Constitución Federal de 1988; por otra, sobre (1.2) las balizas más concretas que esbozan el perfil dogmático del control jurisdiccional de la pretensión acusatoria en el derecho procesal penal brasileño. En la segunda parte (2), la narrativa adquiere caracteres más pragmáticos propensos a desplegar el potencial explicativo del castigo efectivo aplicado por el Poder Judicial, destacando (2.1) los superiores atributos epistemológicos del contraste entre las premisas teóricas de la primera parte con el análisis de casos concretos, (2.2) destacando el ejemplo de la responsabilidad penal atribuida siempre a gestores públicos en función de parámetros objetivos.Este artigo nasce do propósito de articular a fundamentalidade convencional do direito a ser bem acusado, qualificado como garantia pelo artigo 8.2 da quinquagenária Convenção Interamericana sobre Direitos Humanos, com o caráter autonomamente punitivo da pretensão acusatória desenvolvida à margem dos marcos normativos internacionais e nacionais. Para tanto, segmentou-se a dicotomia analítica do “acusar” e do “punir”, em um primeiro momento (1), na investigação, de um lado, sobre os (1.1) marcos normativos internacionais e nacionais que conformam o direito a ser bem acusado, com especial ênfase ao Pacto de São José da Costa Rica e à Constituição Federal de 1988; de outro, sobre (1.2) as balizas mais concretas que delineiam o perfil dogmático do controle jurisdicional da pretensão acusatória no direito processual penal brasileiro. Na segunda parte (2), a narrativa adquire caracteres mais pragmáticos tendentes a desdobrar o potencial explicativo da efetiva punição implementada pelo Poder Judiciário, enfatizando (2.1) os superiores atributos epistemológicos do contraste entre as premissas teóricas da primeira parte com a análise de casos concretos, (2.2) destacando-se o exemplo da responsabilidade penal corriqueiramente imputada a gestores públicos à luz de parâmetros objetivos.Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União2019-11-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/20610.46901/revistadadpu.i12.p51-77Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 12 (2019): Revista de la Defensoria Publica General de la Unión; 51-77Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 12 (2019): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 51-77Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 12 (2019): Federal Public Defender´´'s Office Journal; 51-772448-45551984-032210.46901/revistadadpu.i12reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)instacron:DPUporhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/206/180Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União<!-- Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-102951275-6"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'UA-102951275-6'); </script>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeal, Bruno Hermes2020-10-15T21:32:42Zoai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/206Revistahttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/PUBhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/oaipublicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br2448-45551984-0322opendoar:2023-01-12T16:09:34.082374Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accused Cuando acusar es castigar: quincuagésimo aniversario del derecho convencional a ser bien acusado Quando acusar é punir: quinquagésimo aniversário do direito convencional a ser bem acusado |
title |
When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accused |
spellingShingle |
When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accused Leal, Bruno Hermes Proceso penal. Acusación. Garantías. CADH. Gestores públicos. Processo penal. Acusação. Garantias. CADH. Gestores públicos. Criminal proceedings Accusation Guarantees CADH Public managers |
title_short |
When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accused |
title_full |
When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accused |
title_fullStr |
When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accused |
title_full_unstemmed |
When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accused |
title_sort |
When accusing stands for punishment: Fiftieth anniversary of the conventional right of being properly accused |
author |
Leal, Bruno Hermes |
author_facet |
Leal, Bruno Hermes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leal, Bruno Hermes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Proceso penal. Acusación. Garantías. CADH. Gestores públicos. Processo penal. Acusação. Garantias. CADH. Gestores públicos. Criminal proceedings Accusation Guarantees CADH Public managers |
topic |
Proceso penal. Acusación. Garantías. CADH. Gestores públicos. Processo penal. Acusação. Garantias. CADH. Gestores públicos. Criminal proceedings Accusation Guarantees CADH Public managers |
description |
This paper came from the purpose of articulating the conventional fundamentality of the right of being properly accused, qualified as a guarantee by art. 8.2 of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights, with the punitive character of the accusatory claim developed in disagreement with the international and national normative frameworks. For this purpose, the analytical dichotomy of “accusing” and “punishing” was first segmented (1) in the investigation, on the one hand, of the (1.1) international and national normative frameworks that make up the right of being properly accused, with special emphasis on the Pact of San José of Costa Rica and the Federal Constitution of 1988; on the other, on (1.2) the most concrete marks that outline the dogmatic profile of the judicial control of the accusatory pretension in Brazilian criminal procedural law. In the second part (2), the narrative acquires more pragmatic traits tending to unfold the explanatory potential of the effective punishment implemented by the Judiciary, emphasizing (2.1) the superior epistemological attributes of the contrast between the theoretical premises of the first part with the analysis of concrete cases, (2.2) highlighting the example of criminal liability that is commonly attributed to public managers according to an objective pattern. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/206 10.46901/revistadadpu.i12.p51-77 |
url |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/206 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46901/revistadadpu.i12.p51-77 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/206/180 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 12 (2019): Revista de la Defensoria Publica General de la Unión; 51-77 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 12 (2019): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 51-77 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 12 (2019): Federal Public Defender´´'s Office Journal; 51-77 2448-4555 1984-0322 10.46901/revistadadpu.i12 reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) instacron:DPU |
instname_str |
Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
instacron_str |
DPU |
institution |
DPU |
reponame_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br |
_version_ |
1797054102693216256 |