The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SCHNEIDER,BEN ROSS
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Economia Política
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572015000100114
Resumo: The record of successful developmental states in East Asia and the partial successes of developmental states in Latin America suggest several common preconditions for effective state intervention including a Weberian bureaucracy, monitoring of implementation, reciprocity (subsidies in exchange for performance), and collaborative relations between government and business. Although Brazil failed to develop the high technology manufacturing industry and exports that have fueled sustained growth in East Asia, its developmental state had a number of important, and often neglected, successes, especially in steel, automobiles, mining, ethanol, and aircraft manufacturing. Where Brazil's developmental state was less successful was in promoting sectors like information technology and nuclear energy, as well as overall social and regional equality. In addition, some isolated initiatives by state governments were also effective in promoting particular local segments of industry and agriculture. Comparisons with East Asia, highlight the central role of state enterprises in Brazil that in effect internalized monitoring and reciprocity and bypassed collaboration between business and government (that was overall rarer in Brazil).
id EDITORA_34-1_974b4541c9c73ed89547f8532abe86c4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-31572015000100114
network_acronym_str EDITORA_34-1
network_name_str Revista de Economia Política
repository_id_str
spelling The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectivesdevelopmental stateindustrial policystate owned enterpriseBrazilThe record of successful developmental states in East Asia and the partial successes of developmental states in Latin America suggest several common preconditions for effective state intervention including a Weberian bureaucracy, monitoring of implementation, reciprocity (subsidies in exchange for performance), and collaborative relations between government and business. Although Brazil failed to develop the high technology manufacturing industry and exports that have fueled sustained growth in East Asia, its developmental state had a number of important, and often neglected, successes, especially in steel, automobiles, mining, ethanol, and aircraft manufacturing. Where Brazil's developmental state was less successful was in promoting sectors like information technology and nuclear energy, as well as overall social and regional equality. In addition, some isolated initiatives by state governments were also effective in promoting particular local segments of industry and agriculture. Comparisons with East Asia, highlight the central role of state enterprises in Brazil that in effect internalized monitoring and reciprocity and bypassed collaboration between business and government (that was overall rarer in Brazil).Centro de Economia Política2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572015000100114Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.35 n.1 2015reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_3410.1590/0101-31572015v35n01a07info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSCHNEIDER,BEN ROSSeng2015-07-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-31572015000100114Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2015-07-07T00:00Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives
title The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives
spellingShingle The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives
SCHNEIDER,BEN ROSS
developmental state
industrial policy
state owned enterprise
Brazil
title_short The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives
title_full The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives
title_fullStr The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives
title_full_unstemmed The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives
title_sort The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives
author SCHNEIDER,BEN ROSS
author_facet SCHNEIDER,BEN ROSS
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SCHNEIDER,BEN ROSS
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv developmental state
industrial policy
state owned enterprise
Brazil
topic developmental state
industrial policy
state owned enterprise
Brazil
description The record of successful developmental states in East Asia and the partial successes of developmental states in Latin America suggest several common preconditions for effective state intervention including a Weberian bureaucracy, monitoring of implementation, reciprocity (subsidies in exchange for performance), and collaborative relations between government and business. Although Brazil failed to develop the high technology manufacturing industry and exports that have fueled sustained growth in East Asia, its developmental state had a number of important, and often neglected, successes, especially in steel, automobiles, mining, ethanol, and aircraft manufacturing. Where Brazil's developmental state was less successful was in promoting sectors like information technology and nuclear energy, as well as overall social and regional equality. In addition, some isolated initiatives by state governments were also effective in promoting particular local segments of industry and agriculture. Comparisons with East Asia, highlight the central role of state enterprises in Brazil that in effect internalized monitoring and reciprocity and bypassed collaboration between business and government (that was overall rarer in Brazil).
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572015000100114
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572015000100114
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0101-31572015v35n01a07
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.35 n.1 2015
reponame:Revista de Economia Política
instname:EDITORA 34
instacron:EDITORA_34
instname_str EDITORA 34
instacron_str EDITORA_34
institution EDITORA_34
reponame_str Revista de Economia Política
collection Revista de Economia Política
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br
_version_ 1754122481454546944