The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Economia Política |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572015000100114 |
Resumo: | The record of successful developmental states in East Asia and the partial successes of developmental states in Latin America suggest several common preconditions for effective state intervention including a Weberian bureaucracy, monitoring of implementation, reciprocity (subsidies in exchange for performance), and collaborative relations between government and business. Although Brazil failed to develop the high technology manufacturing industry and exports that have fueled sustained growth in East Asia, its developmental state had a number of important, and often neglected, successes, especially in steel, automobiles, mining, ethanol, and aircraft manufacturing. Where Brazil's developmental state was less successful was in promoting sectors like information technology and nuclear energy, as well as overall social and regional equality. In addition, some isolated initiatives by state governments were also effective in promoting particular local segments of industry and agriculture. Comparisons with East Asia, highlight the central role of state enterprises in Brazil that in effect internalized monitoring and reciprocity and bypassed collaboration between business and government (that was overall rarer in Brazil). |
id |
EDITORA_34-1_974b4541c9c73ed89547f8532abe86c4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-31572015000100114 |
network_acronym_str |
EDITORA_34-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Economia Política |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectivesdevelopmental stateindustrial policystate owned enterpriseBrazilThe record of successful developmental states in East Asia and the partial successes of developmental states in Latin America suggest several common preconditions for effective state intervention including a Weberian bureaucracy, monitoring of implementation, reciprocity (subsidies in exchange for performance), and collaborative relations between government and business. Although Brazil failed to develop the high technology manufacturing industry and exports that have fueled sustained growth in East Asia, its developmental state had a number of important, and often neglected, successes, especially in steel, automobiles, mining, ethanol, and aircraft manufacturing. Where Brazil's developmental state was less successful was in promoting sectors like information technology and nuclear energy, as well as overall social and regional equality. In addition, some isolated initiatives by state governments were also effective in promoting particular local segments of industry and agriculture. Comparisons with East Asia, highlight the central role of state enterprises in Brazil that in effect internalized monitoring and reciprocity and bypassed collaboration between business and government (that was overall rarer in Brazil).Centro de Economia Política2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572015000100114Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.35 n.1 2015reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_3410.1590/0101-31572015v35n01a07info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSCHNEIDER,BEN ROSSeng2015-07-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-31572015000100114Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2015-07-07T00:00Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives |
title |
The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives |
spellingShingle |
The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives SCHNEIDER,BEN ROSS developmental state industrial policy state owned enterprise Brazil |
title_short |
The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives |
title_full |
The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives |
title_fullStr |
The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed |
The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives |
title_sort |
The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives |
author |
SCHNEIDER,BEN ROSS |
author_facet |
SCHNEIDER,BEN ROSS |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SCHNEIDER,BEN ROSS |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
developmental state industrial policy state owned enterprise Brazil |
topic |
developmental state industrial policy state owned enterprise Brazil |
description |
The record of successful developmental states in East Asia and the partial successes of developmental states in Latin America suggest several common preconditions for effective state intervention including a Weberian bureaucracy, monitoring of implementation, reciprocity (subsidies in exchange for performance), and collaborative relations between government and business. Although Brazil failed to develop the high technology manufacturing industry and exports that have fueled sustained growth in East Asia, its developmental state had a number of important, and often neglected, successes, especially in steel, automobiles, mining, ethanol, and aircraft manufacturing. Where Brazil's developmental state was less successful was in promoting sectors like information technology and nuclear energy, as well as overall social and regional equality. In addition, some isolated initiatives by state governments were also effective in promoting particular local segments of industry and agriculture. Comparisons with East Asia, highlight the central role of state enterprises in Brazil that in effect internalized monitoring and reciprocity and bypassed collaboration between business and government (that was overall rarer in Brazil). |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572015000100114 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572015000100114 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0101-31572015v35n01a07 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Economia Política |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Economia Política |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.35 n.1 2015 reponame:Revista de Economia Política instname:EDITORA 34 instacron:EDITORA_34 |
instname_str |
EDITORA 34 |
instacron_str |
EDITORA_34 |
institution |
EDITORA_34 |
reponame_str |
Revista de Economia Política |
collection |
Revista de Economia Política |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34 |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br |
_version_ |
1754122481454546944 |