A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseano

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Berger,Bruno
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Pessali,Huáscar Fialho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Economia Política
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000200010
Resumo: The theory of the perspective and the changes of preference in the mainstream: a Lakatosean prospect. For many decades over the 20th Century, the mainstream of economics adopted a normative and axiomatic theory of individual behavior in which maximizing procedures were carried out by rationally unbounded agents. This status has been challenged on many grounds and alternative views from fields like psychology have found a way into the core of economics research frontier. Prospect theory, developed by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky since the 1970s, has provided a more empirical, inductive and descriptive theory of decision making. It has made significant inroads into mainstream microeconomics, shaking the habits of some of its practitioners. This paper first takes stock of its main developments and then uses a Lakatosian framework to draw out its negative and positive heuristics. In what follows, its heuristics are compared to those of traditional rational decision-making theories. The differences between them are highlighted, pointing to changes in the mainstream of the profession and to new opportunities for research.
id EDITORA_34-1_d6e402cadbc0676f45c6514d4fcd712f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-31572010000200010
network_acronym_str EDITORA_34-1
network_name_str Revista de Economia Política
repository_id_str
spelling A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseanodecision makingprospect theorybehavioral economicsexperimental economicsexpected utility theoryThe theory of the perspective and the changes of preference in the mainstream: a Lakatosean prospect. For many decades over the 20th Century, the mainstream of economics adopted a normative and axiomatic theory of individual behavior in which maximizing procedures were carried out by rationally unbounded agents. This status has been challenged on many grounds and alternative views from fields like psychology have found a way into the core of economics research frontier. Prospect theory, developed by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky since the 1970s, has provided a more empirical, inductive and descriptive theory of decision making. It has made significant inroads into mainstream microeconomics, shaking the habits of some of its practitioners. This paper first takes stock of its main developments and then uses a Lakatosian framework to draw out its negative and positive heuristics. In what follows, its heuristics are compared to those of traditional rational decision-making theories. The differences between them are highlighted, pointing to changes in the mainstream of the profession and to new opportunities for research.Centro de Economia Política2010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000200010Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.30 n.2 2010reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_3410.1590/S0101-31572010000200010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBerger,BrunoPessali,Huáscar Fialhopor2010-05-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-31572010000200010Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2010-05-21T00:00Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseano
title A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseano
spellingShingle A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseano
Berger,Bruno
decision making
prospect theory
behavioral economics
experimental economics
expected utility theory
title_short A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseano
title_full A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseano
title_fullStr A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseano
title_full_unstemmed A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseano
title_sort A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto Lakatoseano
author Berger,Bruno
author_facet Berger,Bruno
Pessali,Huáscar Fialho
author_role author
author2 Pessali,Huáscar Fialho
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Berger,Bruno
Pessali,Huáscar Fialho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv decision making
prospect theory
behavioral economics
experimental economics
expected utility theory
topic decision making
prospect theory
behavioral economics
experimental economics
expected utility theory
description The theory of the perspective and the changes of preference in the mainstream: a Lakatosean prospect. For many decades over the 20th Century, the mainstream of economics adopted a normative and axiomatic theory of individual behavior in which maximizing procedures were carried out by rationally unbounded agents. This status has been challenged on many grounds and alternative views from fields like psychology have found a way into the core of economics research frontier. Prospect theory, developed by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky since the 1970s, has provided a more empirical, inductive and descriptive theory of decision making. It has made significant inroads into mainstream microeconomics, shaking the habits of some of its practitioners. This paper first takes stock of its main developments and then uses a Lakatosian framework to draw out its negative and positive heuristics. In what follows, its heuristics are compared to those of traditional rational decision-making theories. The differences between them are highlighted, pointing to changes in the mainstream of the profession and to new opportunities for research.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000200010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000200010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-31572010000200010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.30 n.2 2010
reponame:Revista de Economia Política
instname:EDITORA 34
instacron:EDITORA_34
instname_str EDITORA 34
instacron_str EDITORA_34
institution EDITORA_34
reponame_str Revista de Economia Política
collection Revista de Economia Política
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br
_version_ 1754122480758292480