Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000901726 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: To date, no studies have been performed evaluating the effect of boar spermatozoa concentration in 0.5mL freezing straws, leading us to examine this question. Each sperm-rich fraction of the ejaculate (n=25) was diluted at five different sperm concentrations (100, 200, 300, 600 and 800 x 106 spermatozoa/mL), packaged in 0.5mL straws, and subsequently frozen. After thawing, the sperm from all of treatment groups were analyzed to determine motility characteristics using a sperm class analyzer (SCA-CASA), and their plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, sperm membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were analyzed by flow cytometry. An increase in spermatozoa concentration above 300x106 spermatozoa/mL in a 0.5mL straw impaired (p<0.05) the total and progressive motility, curvilinear velocity, straight-line velocity, linearity and beat cross frequency. However, the plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were not influenced (p>0.05) by high spermatozoa concentrations at freezing. Therefore, to increase spermatozoa survival and total and progressive motility after thawing, boar spermatozoa should be frozen at concentrations up to 300x106 spermatozoa/mL. |
id |
EMBRAPA-2_2669b236de0d02e1f901bf334387ede3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-736X2018000901726 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viabilityCryopreservationboar semenspermatozoa concentrationsperm viabilitycryoinjurycryocapacitationswineABSTRACT: To date, no studies have been performed evaluating the effect of boar spermatozoa concentration in 0.5mL freezing straws, leading us to examine this question. Each sperm-rich fraction of the ejaculate (n=25) was diluted at five different sperm concentrations (100, 200, 300, 600 and 800 x 106 spermatozoa/mL), packaged in 0.5mL straws, and subsequently frozen. After thawing, the sperm from all of treatment groups were analyzed to determine motility characteristics using a sperm class analyzer (SCA-CASA), and their plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, sperm membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were analyzed by flow cytometry. An increase in spermatozoa concentration above 300x106 spermatozoa/mL in a 0.5mL straw impaired (p<0.05) the total and progressive motility, curvilinear velocity, straight-line velocity, linearity and beat cross frequency. However, the plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were not influenced (p>0.05) by high spermatozoa concentrations at freezing. Therefore, to increase spermatozoa survival and total and progressive motility after thawing, boar spermatozoa should be frozen at concentrations up to 300x106 spermatozoa/mL.Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000901726Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.38 n.9 2018reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)instacron:EMBRAPA10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5465info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRavagnani,Gisele M.Torres,Mariana A.Leal,Diego F.Martins,Simone M.M.K.Papa,Frederico O.Dell’Aqua Junior,José A.Alvarenga,Marco A.Andrade,André F.C.eng2018-11-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-736X2018000901726Revistahttp://www.pvb.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcolegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br0100-736X1678-5150opendoar:2018-11-01T00:00Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability |
title |
Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability |
spellingShingle |
Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability Ravagnani,Gisele M. Cryopreservation boar semen spermatozoa concentration sperm viability cryoinjury cryocapacitation swine |
title_short |
Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability |
title_full |
Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability |
title_fullStr |
Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability |
title_sort |
Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability |
author |
Ravagnani,Gisele M. |
author_facet |
Ravagnani,Gisele M. Torres,Mariana A. Leal,Diego F. Martins,Simone M.M.K. Papa,Frederico O. Dell’Aqua Junior,José A. Alvarenga,Marco A. Andrade,André F.C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Torres,Mariana A. Leal,Diego F. Martins,Simone M.M.K. Papa,Frederico O. Dell’Aqua Junior,José A. Alvarenga,Marco A. Andrade,André F.C. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ravagnani,Gisele M. Torres,Mariana A. Leal,Diego F. Martins,Simone M.M.K. Papa,Frederico O. Dell’Aqua Junior,José A. Alvarenga,Marco A. Andrade,André F.C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cryopreservation boar semen spermatozoa concentration sperm viability cryoinjury cryocapacitation swine |
topic |
Cryopreservation boar semen spermatozoa concentration sperm viability cryoinjury cryocapacitation swine |
description |
ABSTRACT: To date, no studies have been performed evaluating the effect of boar spermatozoa concentration in 0.5mL freezing straws, leading us to examine this question. Each sperm-rich fraction of the ejaculate (n=25) was diluted at five different sperm concentrations (100, 200, 300, 600 and 800 x 106 spermatozoa/mL), packaged in 0.5mL straws, and subsequently frozen. After thawing, the sperm from all of treatment groups were analyzed to determine motility characteristics using a sperm class analyzer (SCA-CASA), and their plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, sperm membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were analyzed by flow cytometry. An increase in spermatozoa concentration above 300x106 spermatozoa/mL in a 0.5mL straw impaired (p<0.05) the total and progressive motility, curvilinear velocity, straight-line velocity, linearity and beat cross frequency. However, the plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were not influenced (p>0.05) by high spermatozoa concentrations at freezing. Therefore, to increase spermatozoa survival and total and progressive motility after thawing, boar spermatozoa should be frozen at concentrations up to 300x106 spermatozoa/mL. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000901726 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000901726 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5465 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.38 n.9 2018 reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
colegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br |
_version_ |
1754122238937792512 |