Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2013000200021 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to compare two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification. Tear samples were collected from 29 healthy dogs (58 eyes) using Schirmer tear test (STT) strip and microcapillary tubes. The samples were frozen at -80ºC and analyzed by the Bradford method. Results were analyzed by Student's t test. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with microcapillary tube were 4.45mg/mL ±0.35 and 4,52mg/mL ±0.29 for right and left eyes respectively. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with Schirmer Tear Test (STT) strip were and 54.5mg/mL ±0.63 and 54.15mg/mL ±0.65 to right and left eyes respectively. Statistically significant differences (p<0.001) were found between the methods. In the conditions in which this study was conducted, the average protein concentration obtained with the Bradford test from tear samples obtained by Schirmer Tear Test (STT) strip showed values higher than those obtained with microcapillary tube. It is important that concentration of tear protein pattern values should be analyzed according the method used to collect tear samples. |
id |
EMBRAPA-2_5a44cfa38440f350b23682c339868766 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-736X2013000200021 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford methodTear samplingproteinSchirmermicrocapillaryBradford methodThe aim of this study was to compare two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification. Tear samples were collected from 29 healthy dogs (58 eyes) using Schirmer tear test (STT) strip and microcapillary tubes. The samples were frozen at -80ºC and analyzed by the Bradford method. Results were analyzed by Student's t test. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with microcapillary tube were 4.45mg/mL ±0.35 and 4,52mg/mL ±0.29 for right and left eyes respectively. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with Schirmer Tear Test (STT) strip were and 54.5mg/mL ±0.63 and 54.15mg/mL ±0.65 to right and left eyes respectively. Statistically significant differences (p<0.001) were found between the methods. In the conditions in which this study was conducted, the average protein concentration obtained with the Bradford test from tear samples obtained by Schirmer Tear Test (STT) strip showed values higher than those obtained with microcapillary tube. It is important that concentration of tear protein pattern values should be analyzed according the method used to collect tear samples.Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA2013-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2013000200021Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.33 n.2 2013reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)instacron:EMBRAPA10.1590/S0100-736X2013000200021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFarias,ElianaYasunaga,Katia L.Peixoto,Romulo V.R.Fonseca,Micaella P.Fontes,WagnerGalera,Paula D.eng2013-04-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-736X2013000200021Revistahttp://www.pvb.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcolegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br0100-736X1678-5150opendoar:2013-04-11T00:00Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method |
title |
Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method Farias,Eliana Tear sampling protein Schirmer microcapillary Bradford method |
title_short |
Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method |
title_full |
Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method |
title_sort |
Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method |
author |
Farias,Eliana |
author_facet |
Farias,Eliana Yasunaga,Katia L. Peixoto,Romulo V.R. Fonseca,Micaella P. Fontes,Wagner Galera,Paula D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Yasunaga,Katia L. Peixoto,Romulo V.R. Fonseca,Micaella P. Fontes,Wagner Galera,Paula D. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Farias,Eliana Yasunaga,Katia L. Peixoto,Romulo V.R. Fonseca,Micaella P. Fontes,Wagner Galera,Paula D. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tear sampling protein Schirmer microcapillary Bradford method |
topic |
Tear sampling protein Schirmer microcapillary Bradford method |
description |
The aim of this study was to compare two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification. Tear samples were collected from 29 healthy dogs (58 eyes) using Schirmer tear test (STT) strip and microcapillary tubes. The samples were frozen at -80ºC and analyzed by the Bradford method. Results were analyzed by Student's t test. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with microcapillary tube were 4.45mg/mL ±0.35 and 4,52mg/mL ±0.29 for right and left eyes respectively. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with Schirmer Tear Test (STT) strip were and 54.5mg/mL ±0.63 and 54.15mg/mL ±0.65 to right and left eyes respectively. Statistically significant differences (p<0.001) were found between the methods. In the conditions in which this study was conducted, the average protein concentration obtained with the Bradford test from tear samples obtained by Schirmer Tear Test (STT) strip showed values higher than those obtained with microcapillary tube. It is important that concentration of tear protein pattern values should be analyzed according the method used to collect tear samples. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2013000200021 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2013000200021 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-736X2013000200021 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.33 n.2 2013 reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
colegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br |
_version_ |
1754122232840323072 |