Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clones

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Juliano Quarteroli
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Souza, Mario Ivo Tavares de, Gonçalves, Paulo de Souza, Aguiar, Adriano Tosoni da Eira, Gouvêa, Lígia Regina Lima, Pinotti, Raquel Nakazato
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7574
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate yield performance and economic aspects of three clones of rubber tree [Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell. Arg.], in different tapping systems. The trial was placed under randomized blocks design with split-plot in time. The main treatments were PR 255, RRIM 600 and GT 1 clones submitted to nine systems of tapping: ½S d/3 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/3 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/4 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/4 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/5 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/5 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/7 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/7 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y and ½S d/2 6d/7.11m/y (check). The variables were: girth increment, dry rubber productivity and brown bast. The economic viability of the tapping systems was also evaluated. Economical benefits in the ½S d/3.ET 2,5% 8/y system for PR 255 and RRIM 600 clones and in the ½S d/7.ET 2,5% 8/y system for GT 1 clone were observed, compared with the check. Highest and smaller incidence of brown bast were observed in the ½S d/3.ET 5,0% 8/y and ½S d/7.ET 5,0% 8/y systems, respectively.
id EMBRAPA-4_24f6aaaacfdb0b3d0790299a1d89807e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/7574
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clonesViabilidade econômica de diferentes sistemas de sangria em clones de seringueiraHevea brasiliensis; economy; natural rubber; stimulation; brown bastHevea brasiliensis; economia; borracha natural; estimulação; secamento do painelThe objective of this work was to evaluate yield performance and economic aspects of three clones of rubber tree [Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell. Arg.], in different tapping systems. The trial was placed under randomized blocks design with split-plot in time. The main treatments were PR 255, RRIM 600 and GT 1 clones submitted to nine systems of tapping: ½S d/3 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/3 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/4 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/4 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/5 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/5 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/7 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/7 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y and ½S d/2 6d/7.11m/y (check). The variables were: girth increment, dry rubber productivity and brown bast. The economic viability of the tapping systems was also evaluated. Economical benefits in the ½S d/3.ET 2,5% 8/y system for PR 255 and RRIM 600 clones and in the ½S d/7.ET 2,5% 8/y system for GT 1 clone were observed, compared with the check. Highest and smaller incidence of brown bast were observed in the ½S d/3.ET 5,0% 8/y and ½S d/7.ET 5,0% 8/y systems, respectively.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o desempenho produtivo e os aspectos econômicos de três clones de seringueira [Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell. Arg.], sob nove sistemas de sangria. O experimento foi instalado sob delineamento de blocos ao acaso com parcelas subdivididas no tempo. Os tratamentos principais foram os clones PR 255, RRIM 600 e GT 1, submetidos aos seguintes sistemas de sangria: ½S d/3 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/3 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/4 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/4 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/5 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/5 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/7 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/7 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y e ½S d/2 6d/7.11m/y (testemunha). As variáveis estudadas foram: perímetro do caule, produtividade de borracha seca e secamento do painel. Também foi avaliada a viabilidade econômica dos sistemas de sangria. Observaram-se maior produtividade e rentabilidade dos sistemas ½S d/3.ET 2,5% 8/y para os clones PR 255 e RRIM 600 e ½S d/7.ET 2,5% 8/y para o clone GT 1, comparados com a testemunha. A maior e a menor porcentagem de secamento do painel foram observadas nos sistemas ½S d/3 ET 5,0% 8/y e ½S d/7.ET 5,0% 8/y, respectivamente.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraSilva, Juliano QuarteroliSouza, Mario Ivo Tavares deGonçalves, Paulo de SouzaAguiar, Adriano Tosoni da EiraGouvêa, Lígia Regina LimaPinotti, Raquel Nakazato2007-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7574Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.42, n.3, mar. 2007; 349-356Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.42, n.3, mar. 2007; 349-3561678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7574/4493info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-05-28T18:36:47Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/7574Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-05-28T18:36:47Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clones
Viabilidade econômica de diferentes sistemas de sangria em clones de seringueira
title Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clones
spellingShingle Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clones
Silva, Juliano Quarteroli
Hevea brasiliensis; economy; natural rubber; stimulation; brown bast
Hevea brasiliensis; economia; borracha natural; estimulação; secamento do painel
title_short Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clones
title_full Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clones
title_fullStr Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clones
title_full_unstemmed Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clones
title_sort Economic viability of different tapping systems in rubber tree clones
author Silva, Juliano Quarteroli
author_facet Silva, Juliano Quarteroli
Souza, Mario Ivo Tavares de
Gonçalves, Paulo de Souza
Aguiar, Adriano Tosoni da Eira
Gouvêa, Lígia Regina Lima
Pinotti, Raquel Nakazato
author_role author
author2 Souza, Mario Ivo Tavares de
Gonçalves, Paulo de Souza
Aguiar, Adriano Tosoni da Eira
Gouvêa, Lígia Regina Lima
Pinotti, Raquel Nakazato
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Juliano Quarteroli
Souza, Mario Ivo Tavares de
Gonçalves, Paulo de Souza
Aguiar, Adriano Tosoni da Eira
Gouvêa, Lígia Regina Lima
Pinotti, Raquel Nakazato
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hevea brasiliensis; economy; natural rubber; stimulation; brown bast
Hevea brasiliensis; economia; borracha natural; estimulação; secamento do painel
topic Hevea brasiliensis; economy; natural rubber; stimulation; brown bast
Hevea brasiliensis; economia; borracha natural; estimulação; secamento do painel
description The objective of this work was to evaluate yield performance and economic aspects of three clones of rubber tree [Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell. Arg.], in different tapping systems. The trial was placed under randomized blocks design with split-plot in time. The main treatments were PR 255, RRIM 600 and GT 1 clones submitted to nine systems of tapping: ½S d/3 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/3 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/4 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/4 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/5 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/5 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/7 6d/7.11m/y.ET 2,5% Pa La 8/y; ½S d/7 6d/7.11m/y.ET 5,0% Pa La 8/y and ½S d/2 6d/7.11m/y (check). The variables were: girth increment, dry rubber productivity and brown bast. The economic viability of the tapping systems was also evaluated. Economical benefits in the ½S d/3.ET 2,5% 8/y system for PR 255 and RRIM 600 clones and in the ½S d/7.ET 2,5% 8/y system for GT 1 clone were observed, compared with the check. Highest and smaller incidence of brown bast were observed in the ½S d/3.ET 5,0% 8/y and ½S d/7.ET 5,0% 8/y systems, respectively.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-03-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7574
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7574
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7574/4493
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.42, n.3, mar. 2007; 349-356
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.42, n.3, mar. 2007; 349-356
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416662176759808

Registros relacionados